Connect with us

News

‘Off-the-Charts Arrogance’: Joe Rogan Pummeled for Harris Campaign Comment

Published

on

Vice President Kamala Harris will deliver her “Closing Argument” speech Tuesday evening at the Ellipse—the same Washington, D.C. park where Donald Trump held his “Save America” rally telling supporters to march to the Capitol on January 6, 2021, ahead of the insurrection.

Before her 7:30 PM ET event, the Vice President will be giving five interviews, according to campaign spokesperson Ian Sams: “Battleground TV interviews in Detroit, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, and Pittsburgh + Spanish radio in Pennsylvania to reach Latinos, including Puerto Ricans.”

Not included in her interviews Tuesday is podcaster Joe Rogan, with whom the campaign has been in talks.

Overnight, Rogan explained on social media that those talks are ongoing, despite there being just one week until Election Day.

READ MORE: ‘Maybe’ It’s Racist: JD Vance Tries to Whitewash Trump Rally Attack on Puerto Rico

Just before that, Rogan had posted his three-hour interview with Donald Trump, which aired Friday, to Elon Musk’s social media site X. He then shared this statement:

“Also, for the record the Harris campaign has not passed on doing the podcast. They offered a date for Tuesday, but I would have had to travel to her and they only wanted to do an hour. I strongly feel the best way to do it is in the studio in Austin. My sincere wish is to just have a nice conversation and get to know her as a human being. I really hope we can make it happen.”

Some political experts say an interview with Rogan, the nation’s top podcaster whose largely male audience (he reportedly has 14 million followers on Spotify, and 18 million on YouTube), could help Harris, who is hoping to get more male voters to cast their ballot for her. But a former Harris campaign senior advisor offered this:

“Hot take—Rogan needs the Harris interview more than @KamalaHQ does. The exposure with a new audience who is deeply skeptical of him after years of out of context clips would be huge. He could pull in a lot of new people who have never listened to a full episode before, and even if he retained a fraction of that audience it would move him more into the mainstream.”

Some critics are blasting Rogan.

RELATED: ‘We Know How to Take the Trash Out’: Influential Latino Stars Blast Trump’s Racist Rally

“Is this a podcast host saying he’s unwilling to travel to interview the sitting vice president for an hour?” asked Zeteo News media columnist Justin Baragona.

“I think Joe Rogan is afraid to interview Kamala Harris because that would require a great deal of research and preparation that he is not equipped to do,” responded award-winning investigative journalist Lisa Guerrero.

“Come on @joerogan. It’s the last week of the campaign! She’s a little busier than you. Get on a (private) plane and do the interview, even if just for an hour. Americans want to hear it,” exclaimed professor of political science and former U.S. Ambassador to Russia, Michael McFaul.

“If I could have interviewed the a person who is potentially the future president, I would have canceled everything in my calendar. Unless you were burying a close friend or relative, you weren’t committed to the interview,” remarked professor of law Darren Hutchinson.

“Demanding a VP come to you in final week of campaign sort of says it all,” commented The Lincoln Project’s Stuart Stevens, a top Republican political strategist, appearing to suggest Rogan has a “feeling of self-importance and omnipotence.”

“So the sitting Vice President and likely the next President of the United States should fly over to see you? Respect for the office of VP as well as the fact that she has a competitive race to run, suggests you get your ass on a plane and talk to her wherever [she] is,” commented Alexander Vindman, the former Director for European Affairs for the U.S. National Security Council (NSC).

“Just off-the-charts arrogance,” remarked investigative journalist and founder of Popular Information Judd Legum.

READ MORE: ‘What’s He Confessing to?’: Trump’s Mike Johnson ‘Secret’ Draws Electoral College Concerns

 

There's a reason 10,000 people subscribe to NCRM. You can get the news before it breaks just by subscribing, plus you can learn something new every day.
Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

Trump Eying City Where He Claimed Immigrants Were ‘Eating the Dogs’: Report

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents may be poised to target the Ohio city where Trump, then a candidate in 2024, falsely insisted that Haitian immigrants were eating the pets of residents.

Local officials are bracing for a 30-day ICE surge, The New Republic reported.

“Springfield City School District Superintendent Bob Hill said that local officials had discussed the likelihood that federal immigration authorities could descend on the city sometime after Temporary Protected Status for Haitian immigrants expires on February 3,” TNR noted, citing a report from the Springfield News-Sun.

Superintendent Hill suggested there was no evidence that immigration enforcement would take place on school property.

Republican Ohio Governor Mike DeWine led a meeting last week in which he “discussed that a federal immigration enforcement initiative may begin sometime after the TPS deadline,” the News-Sun reported.

READ MORE: Trump Promised a ‘More Relaxed’ Minnesota Approach—Bondi Scorched for Doing the Opposite

Details are fluid, DeWine spokesperson Dan Tierney noted, and he “said there has not been ‘formal communication’ of actions by ICE or any immigration authority.”

“We are dealing with hypotheticals right now. It would be very imprudent to give people guidance on a fluid situation based upon hypotheticals,” Tierney said.

Pam Shay, director of federal programs at Springfield City Schools said that about 20 percent of the district’s 1,400 students do not have documents indicating citizenship.

The News-Sun also reported that immigrants granted Temporary Protected Status “will no longer have status unless they sought and received another form of protection, like asylum.”

In 2024, Trump infamously declared, “In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs.”

“The people that came in, they’re eating the cats, they’re eating, they’re eating the pets of the people that live there,” candidate Trump said at a presidential debate.

The claim had already been debunked, including by city officials, as ABC News reported at the time.

READ MORE: ‘Piling Lie Upon Lie’: CNN Fact-Checker Torches Trump’s Iowa Claims

 

Image via Reuters

 

 

Continue Reading

News

Trump Promised a ‘More Relaxed’ Minnesota Approach—Bondi Scorched for Doing the Opposite

Published

on

President Donald Trump said that Americans would see a de-escalation in Minnesota, and a “more relaxed” approach on the ground in Minneapolis after federal agents shot and killed two U.S. citizens in under three weeks. But Attorney General Pam Bondi’s messaging on Wednesday pointed in a different direction.

In a social media post Wednesday afternoon, the attorney general wrote:

“MINNESOTA ARRESTS — I am on the ground in Minneapolis today. Federal agents have arrested 16 Minnesota rioters for allegedly assaulting federal law enforcement — people who have been resisting and impeding our federal law enforcement agents.”

“We expect more arrests to come,” she added, appearing to suggest the arrests would target Americans who are protesting, rather than undocumented immigrants accused of crimes.

READ MORE: ‘Piling Lie Upon Lie’: CNN Fact-Checker Torches Trump’s Iowa Claims

“I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: NOTHING will stop President Trump and this Department of Justice from enforcing the law.”

Bondi then posted the names of the people who were arrested, and, in many cases, photos of them standing next to federal officers, who had their backs to the camera. It was unclear why they were identified as “rioters.”

Critics slammed the attorney general.

“They’re not arresting the people responsible for the murders of Renée Nicole Good or Alex Pretti,” wrote author and activist Lev Parnas. “No — they’re arresting Minnesota citizens and using them as props for a headline. Enough is enough. We need accountability. We need justice. And we are not backing down.”

“No deal on ICE,” political commentator Keith Olbermann wrote to U.S. Senator Brian Schatz (D-HI). “Bondi is boasting that they’re rounding up protestors there now.”

READ MORE: Silence Is Deafening From Second Amendment ‘Don’t Tread on Me’ Crowd: Columnist

“It will be interesting to see if these actually hold up in court — DOJ track record under Bondi has not been good,” noted The Independent’s Andrew Feinberg.

CNN’s Aaron Blake appeared to concur, writing, “the Trump admin has repeatedly accused people of assaulting law enforcement — but then either not actually brought charges or seen the cases crumble.”

“There ain’t no walk back,” declared The Bulwark’s Bill Kristol, appearing to invoke the president’s call for de-escalation.”They’re still all in on mass deportation and mass intimidation.”

“Could we see some video of the ‘assaults’ you allege?” asked U.S. Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-NY). “Nobody believes you or your partisan DOJ — which is focused on protestors not ICE murderers.”

READ MORE: ‘All Tools Necessary’: GOP Hardliners Press Trump on Insurrection Act

 

Image via Reuters

Continue Reading

News

‘Piling Lie Upon Lie’: CNN Fact-Checker Torches Trump’s Iowa Claims

Published

on

Kicking off what is expected to be a weekly campaign-style tour of the nation to promote his agenda ahead of the November midterms, President Donald Trump engaged in what CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale described as an “alternative reality” of “piling lie upon lie” for his Iowa audience.

“You know, inflation we’ve solved; it’s done,” Trump told Fox News during the trip to Iowa. “We have it good where prices are coming way down. They were just saying, in Iowa the fuel is $1.95. Did you hear that? Somebody said $1.85. But it was $3.50, $4.50 just a year ago, a year and a half ago. You look at eggs, you look at groceries, it’s all down. Everything’s come down. Do you notice they don’t mention affordability anymore?”

According to Dale, it’s “true” that egg prices have fallen significantly, but the “rest of his narrative was thoroughly inaccurate.”

He continued his fact check: “Inflation is not over; prices continue to rise. Overall prices have gone up, not down. Overall grocery prices have gone up, not down. Iowa’s average gas price is much higher than $1.95. And Democrats have certainly not stopped mentioning affordability; in fact, it remains a key focus of their public remarks.”

READ MORE: Silence Is Deafening From Second Amendment ‘Don’t Tread on Me’ Crowd: Columnist

Dale apparently wasn’t the only one fact-checking gas prices.

“In an unusual moment,” he writes, “Trump was fact-checked on this subject by an attendee at his Iowa speech on Tuesday. When he spoke of gas in Iowa being $1.95 or $1.85 per gallon, someone in the crowd shouted, ‘No, $2.63,’ according to CNN’s Steve Contorno, who was on scene.”

According to Dale, “Overall consumer prices have increased during this presidential term; in December 2025, seasonally adjusted overall prices were 2.2% higher than they were in January 2025, and, again, 2.7% higher than they were in December 2024.”

He also noted that “It’s not true that ‘you look at groceries, it’s all down.’ In fact, the 0.7% increase in the Consumer Price Index for groceries between November 2025 and December 2025 was the biggest month-to-month jump reported in more than three years.”

And he added, “Iowa gas prices are generally much higher than Trump said.”

READ MORE: ‘All Tools Necessary’: GOP Hardliners Press Trump on Insurrection Act

 

Image via Reuters 

 

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.