Connect with us

‘Small Government’ GOP Vice Chair: I Would Sterilize Poor Women On Medicaid

Published

on

A former state senator now the Vice Chair of the Arizona GOP says if he were in charge of Medicaid he would make sterilization mandatory for poor, unemployed women, and subject their homes to government inspections.

“You put me in charge of Medicaid, the first thing I’d do is get Norplant, birth-control implants, or tubal ligations,” Russell Pearce told listeners on his talk show this week on station KKNT, The Patriot “Intelligent Talk” radio.

“Then we’ll test recipients for drugs and alcohol, and if you want to [reproduce] or use drugs or alcohol, then get a job.”

Pearce, who is now the the Vice Chair of the Arizona GOP, and takes an $85,000 per year government salary for a job that was reconstituted just for him, but claims to be a champion of small government. His latest government job? Convincing elderly Arizona residents to sign up for government assistance.

But Pearce is fervently against government assistance, at least he says so on his conservative talk radio show.

“No cash for Ding Dongs and Ho Hos, you’d only get money for 15-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and powdered milk – all the powdered milk you can haul away,” Pearce, discussing food stamps, said this week. “If you want a steak or frozen pizza, then you’d have to get a job.”

The life-long fifth-generation Arizonan and Tea Party supporter made history for being the chief sponsor of Arizona’s infamous anti-immigrant legislation, SB1070. Parts of that law were struck down in federal court. Pearce later made history by becoming the first Arizona state legislator to be successfully removed from office in a recall election.

Pearce had a few other ideas to share with his radio audience.

People on government assistance programs, again, were he in charge, would be told they have to maintain their property “in a clean, good state of repair, and your home will be subjected to an inspection at any time, possessions will be inventoried.”

“If you want a plasma TV or an X-Box 360, then get a job,” Pearce added, not mentioning that Medicaid recipients are often employed, but live at, near, or below the poverty line.

Listen:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpHKqT8jyuQ#t=118

 

Hat tip: Phoenix New Times and The Raw Story
Image by katerkate via Flickr

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

‘Appalling’: Trump Admin Slammed as Air Force Blocks Early Retirement for Trans Troops

Published

on

Following the Trump administration’s ban on transgender service members, the U.S. Air Force is now denying early retirement benefits to transgender troops with 15 to 18 years of service.

“This is just betrayal of a direct commitment made to these service members,” Shannon Minter of the National Center for LGBTQ Rights told Reuters, calling it “devastating.”

According to Minter, the denial of early retirement benefits could cost transgender service members hundreds of thousands of dollars over their lifetimes.

Reuters calls the benefits denial “the latest escalation by President Donald Trump’s administration as it seeks to bar transgender individuals from joining the U.S. military and remove all who are currently serving. The Pentagon says transgender individuals are medically unfit, something civil rights activists say is untrue and constitutes illegal discrimination.”

READ MORE: Governor Wants Maps to Reflect State’s ‘Christian Conservative Majority’ Says GOP Lawmaker

Critics blasted the Trump administration.

“Absolutely appalling bigotry,” wrote Jessica Riedl, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute. “This is how the administration treats people who have defended our country in the military for nearly two decades? I hope the courts block this, as it cannot possibly be legal.”

“Disgusting way to treat Americans who have stepped up to serve,” wrote Fred Wellman, a graduate of West Point and an Army veteran of 22 years who served four combat tours.

“A draft dodger who never served a day in his life is denying benefits to those who served honorably for 18 years,” commented the nonpartisan Veterans for Responsible Leadership. “Just like when black soldiers were denied benefits after WWII. The cruelty towards marginalized communities that serve is as American as apple pie. We must do better.”

“It was never about the bathrooms or the sports,” remarked U.S. Senator Brian Schatz (D-HI). “It was always just to demonize and punish. These Americans have devoted their careers to keeping us safe, and they are getting screwed by their government.”

“The Trump administration has gone from removing a targeted group from government service to stealing what they earned,” commented Dylan Williams, vice president for government affairs at the Center for International Policy. “It’s textbook fascism and a further step on the path of state repression, dispossession and violence that humanity has seen the horrific consequences of before.”

“The Trump admin is telling anyone who will listen that its treatment of transgender service members is motivated by animus,” wrote civil right attorney Matthew Segal. “The question is whether federal courts, including SCOTUS, will listen.”

READ MORE: Trump Melts Down Over Elizabeth Warren’s Accusations

 

Image via Reuters

Continue Reading

News

‘Pressure Campaign’: Trump Steps Up Racial Oversight of College Admissions

Published

on

President Donald Trump will sign a memorandum ordering colleges and universities to submit information on their admissions to ensure they are complying with a 2023 U.S. Supreme Court order banning affirmative action and gutting race-conscious admissions. The order would expand the current admissions data the government collects.

“Admissions data has increasingly become a focus of the Trump administration as part of its effort to change the ideological balance of the higher education system, which the president views as hostile to conservatives,” The New York Times reported.

Several Ivy League schools have agreed to hand over to the Trump administration certain admissions data, including “standardized test scores and grade point averages of all applicants, as well as information about their race, a measure that could profoundly alter the competitive college admissions process,” according to the Times.

READ MORE: Governor Wants Maps to Reflect State’s ‘Christian Conservative Majority’ Says GOP Lawmaker

The 2023 6-3 Supreme Court ruling banned public and private colleges and universities from considering race as a factor in its admissions decisions. Schools had said they needed to do so to protect the constitutional guarantee of equal protection, as Justice Sonia Sotomayor said in her dissenting opinion.

Bloomberg News called Thursday’s order “a new and expansive front” in the Trump administration’s “pressure campaign against colleges.”

Angel Perez, CEO of the National Association for College Admission Counseling, Bloomberg added, “said the data transparency mandate could drive institutions away from the kinds of holistic admissions practices that have helped them increase diversity on campuses.”

“The bottom line,” Perez said, “is that colleges that don’t admit enough White students will be punished.”

READ MORE: Trump Revives Constitutionally Conflicting Census Overhaul Plan

 

Image via Reuters

Continue Reading

News

‘Patently Unlawful’: FBI Ripped for Backing Cornyn’s Bid to Hunt Down Texas Dems

Published

on

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has agreed to a request from U.S. Senator John Cornyn to locate the Texas Democratic state lawmakers who exited the state in an effort to deny Republicans a quorum—part of a broader attempt to block Governor Greg Abbott and President Donald Trump’s push to redraw congressional maps and boost GOP-held House seats, the Texas Republican announced Thursday.

“We cannot allow these rogue legislators to avoid their constitutional responsibilities,” Senator Cornyn said in a statement that referred to the Texas Democrats as “supposed lawmakers.”

Axios reported that “Texas issued civil warrants for the Democratic lawmakers, but local law enforcement can’t make arrests outside the state.”

The Texas Democrats are in Illinois, according to that state’s Democratic governor, JB Pritzker.

READ MORE: Governor Wants Maps to Reflect State’s ‘Christian Conservative Majority’ Says GOP Lawmaker

Legal and political experts are blasting the move.

“There’s literally no federal law applicable to this situation. None,” Governor Pritzker told podcaster Jessica Yellin on Wednesday, according to Axios.

“The key question here is on what grounds would the FBI be doing this,” wrote MSNBC Justice and Intelligence correspondent Ken Dilanian. “What is the crime they are investigating? The FBI can’t just use its vast surveillance powers to locate random citizens. In fact, that’s what conservatives have long been so concerned about re FISA authorities.”

“This is a patently unlawful, unconstitutional abuse of federal power,” constitutional law professor and political scientist Anthony Michael Kreis said on Thursday.

READ MORE: Trump Revives Constitutionally Conflicting Census Overhaul Plan

“We are in a deeply dangerous, illiberal place in America when the federal government will deploy law enforcement to force state legislators to act on legislation that’s contrary to their conscience and an attempt to undermine free elections,” Kreis added.

The Atlantic’s Dr. Norman Ornstein, a political scientist, addressed Senator Cornyn: “John, I understand your need to tilt crazy right to counter your lunatic primary challenger. But calling on the FBI to act illegally and wrongly to go after Texas Democrats is beneath you, and simply shameful. You used to believe in the law and the Constitution.”

Asking what “criminal interest” the FBI could have in this, U.S. Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-NY) called it “yet another disgusting partisan abuse of power by the FBI,” and said that “any agent asked to assist should refuse to do so.”

Watch video of Governor Pritzker below or at this link.

READ MORE: ‘Wildly Irresponsible’: Tuberville Torched for Blame Game After Fort Stewart Shooting

 

Image via Shutterstock

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.