Sarah Palin’s Breast Pump Problem
Yesterday, I wrote, “From breast pumps to Big Bird, and from food stamps to family planning, the GOP is waging a war on America’s women and children. I wasn’t kidding when, in 1548 words I explained the GOP’s war on women and children — including breast pumps.
Read: “The GOP’s War On Women And Children“
Sarah Palin joined the GOP war against breast pumps yesterday. Speaking to a Long Island, NY business group, Palin echoed Michele Bachmann’s erroneous comments, and said, “No wonder Michelle Obama’s telling everybody, ‘you’d better breastfeed your baby.’ Yeah, you’d better, because the price of milk is so high right now!” (Evidently, the price of milk is now Obama’s fault, too.) Bachmann had said earlier this week, “To think that government has to go out and buy my breast pump for my babies. I mean, you want to talk about the nanny state?â€
But Sarah Pavlus at Media Matters reports that Governor Sarah Palin had a different view just a few short years ago. As Alaska’s governor, Sarah Palin “declared October 2007 ‘Breastfeeding Awareness Month’ and issued a proclamation that said, ‘government and community organizations have a vested interest in protecting and promoting breastfeeding as a means of preventing infant malnutrition, morbidity, and mortality.'”
The New York Times notes, “Ms. Bachmann was wrong that Mrs. Obama wants the government to pay for breast pumps; the I.R.S. would simply allow people to deduct breast-feeding expenses if they itemize, or use the pre-tax dollars in their medical savings accounts to pay for pumps.
“And the federal government is now one of the biggest buyers of baby formula, through its nutritional programs for women and infant children. So giving a tax break for breast-feeding might actually help reduce government spending, as Ms. Bachmann advocates.”
This is yet another example of Sarah Palin the politician putting politics before the health of children. Michelle Obama is merely trying to help educate America about our embarrassing obesity problem. In an earlier reaction to the First Lady, Sarah Palin stuffed her children with S’mores, saying, “This is in honor of Michelle Obama who said the other day we should not have dessert.” But even her fellow Republicans balked.
“Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, a Fox News celebrity like Palin and a potential Republican presidential candidate who lost 100 pounds of excess body fat,” according to a report in the Alaska Dispatch,” joined Republicans saying Palin should have controlled her urge to lash out at all things Obama.”
But like most things in politics, this isn’t about breast pumps, or s’mores, or even the role of government, or taxes. This is about civil rights, and the subjugation of women.
Read: “The End Of A Sarah Palin Presidency“
Bob Burnett at The Huffington Post, one week ago — before breast pump madness week began — wrote, “In the final analysis, contemporary Republican ideology has three interlocked components: promoting a permanent state of war; favoring the interests of the rich over those of the poor; and relegating women to be second-class citizens whose rights are subordinate to those of men.”
What’s especially offensive is that it’s women who are doing it to other women. What’s even more offensive is that they’re doing it merely to appear to be in opposition to something and someone. Sarah Palin clearly knows that “government and community organizations have a vested interest in protecting and promoting breastfeeding as a means of preventing infant malnutrition, morbidity, and mortality.” The fact that Palin is willing to pit the health of children and the freedom of women against minor political gain is appalling.
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
 |
President Donald Trump continues to tease out a possible 2028 run, despite the constitutional prohibition on a third term. On Friday, the 79-year old unveiled a new “slogan,” and his new name for Trump Republican voters.
Trump has acknowledged the constitutional block on a third term, recently telling reporters that Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, a constitutional attorney, told him a third term is not allowed — a fact he appeared to accept.
But Trump on Friday afternoon posted an AI meme of a silver-haired, older-looking Donald Trump, holding a campaign sign that reads — not “Make America Great Again” — but, “Trump 2028, Yes!”
READ MORE: ‘For Sale’: Trump Torched Over Report He’d OK Russia Controlling Parts of Ukraine
The post, on his Truth Social website, also says, “Trumplicans!”
“There is a new word for a TRUMP REPUBLICAN, which is almost everyone,” he recently wrote. “It is, TEPUBLICAN??? Or, TPUBLICAN???”
Apparently, “Trumplicans” won out.
Health care activist Melanie D’Arrigo remarked on Wednesday that “Trump is workshopping names for his cult, while Americans struggle to afford the rising costs of groceries, healthcare and housing.”
Reporting on Trump’s musings, TIME on Thursday noted that his new MAGA moniker comes “amid high-profile divisions within the MAGA base.”
Were Trump to run for a third term, he would be 82 on Election Day in 2028.
READ MORE: Trump Order to Keep ‘Jalopy’ Coal Plant Open Costs Taxpayers Over $100 Million
Image via Reuters
President Donald Trump is under fire over a report that claims he is proposing that the U.S. recognize Russian control of parts of Ukraine, including Crimea, which Russia has unlawfully annexed, as a means to end the war.
“The Telegraph understands that Donald Trump has sent his peace envoy Steve Witkoff and son-in-law Jared Kushner to make the direct offer to Vladimir Putin in Moscow,” the news outlet reported. “The plan to recognize territory, which breaks US diplomatic convention, is likely to go ahead despite concerns among Ukraine’s European allies.”
Russian President Vladimir Putin “on Thursday said Washington’s legal recognition of Crimea and the Donetsk and Luhansk regions as Russian territory would be one of the key issues in negotiations over the US president’s peace plan,” according to The Telegraph.
READ MORE: Trump Order to Keep ‘Jalopy’ Coal Plant Open Costs Taxpayers Over $100 Million
Critics are blasting President Trump.
Shaun Pinner, a former British soldier who served as a contracted Marine fighting in Ukraine’s armed forces, responded to the report:
“I’ve lived through the cost of losing ground. I’ve seen the bodies, the destroyed homes, and I’ve been tortured by Russia like so many others. Land is never ‘just land.’ It’s people. Families. Lives shattered.”
“So yes, watching Trump casually bargain away territory that isn’t even his to give feels like a deep betrayal,” he added. “It’s a lesson I wish none of us had to learn the hard way, and one far too many are being forced to relive again because one of our so-called allies is now suggesting we reward genocide.”
READ MORE: ‘Total Authoritarian Population Control’: Experts Sound Alarm on Trump’s Immigrant Attack
Michael McFaul, former U.S. Ambassador to Russia, remarked, “Trump would be rewarding imperial conquest, thereby encouraging other autocrats to do so, resulting in a very unstable world.”
Russian chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov, co-founder of the Renew Democracy Initiative, issued a warning:
“If the US recognizes territory taken by force, just replace ‘leader of the free world’ with ‘for sale’. Xi can come up with more cash than Putin for Trump and his pals to do the same for Taiwan.”
Marko Mihkelson, Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Estonian Parliament, remarked, “If this is true, then we have a major problem, Houston.”
READ MORE: Republicans Scuttled Trump Health Care Fix Because They Felt ‘Left Out’: Report
Image via Reuters
A Trump administration order to keep an aging and unneeded Michigan coal-fired power plant open and online reportedly is costing taxpayers about $615,000 per day, or $113 million to date. Closing the plant would save taxpayers about $640 million by 2040.
“The Trump administration in May ordered utility giant Consumers Energy to keep the 63-year-old JH Campbell coal plant in western Michigan, about 100 miles north-east of Chicago, online just as it was being retired,” according to The Guardian.
“The costs of unnecessarily running this jalopy coal plant just continue to mount,” Michael Lenoff, an attorney with Earthjustice, which is suing over the order, told The Guardian.
READ MORE: ‘Total Authoritarian Population Control’: Experts Sound Alarm on Trump’s Immigrant Attack
President Donald Trump signed a national energy emergency order on his first day in office this year, rolling back regulations.
In court documents, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel said that the administration’s latest order is “arbitrary and illegal.”
Consumers Energy, the operator of the plant, did not ask the Trump administration for the order to keep the coal plant running, and the Trump administration did not consult local regulators, a spokesperson for the Michigan public service commission (MPSC), told the Guardian in May.
“The unnecessary recent order … will increase the cost of power for homes and businesses in Michigan and across the midwest,” the chair of the MPSC, Dan Scripps, said in a statement at the time.
Reporting on what it called Trump’s “pro-fossil fuel agenda,” The Guardian in January quoted the president:
“We have something that no other manufacturing nation will ever have, the largest amount of oil and gas of any country on Earth, and we are going to use it – let me use it,” Trump said in his inaugural address. “We will be a rich nation again, and it is that liquid gold under our feet that will help to do it.”
READ MORE: Republicans Scuttled Trump Health Care Fix Because They Felt ‘Left Out’: Report
Image via Reuters
‘Total Authoritarian Population Control’: Experts Sound Alarm on Trump’s Immigrant Attack
Trump Order to Keep ‘Jalopy’ Coal Plant Open Costs Taxpayers Over $100 Million
‘For Sale’: Trump Torched Over Report He’d OK Russia Controlling Parts of Ukraine
Trump Teases 2028 ‘Campaign’ With New Slogan
Trump Teases 2028 ‘Campaign’ With New Slogan
‘For Sale’: Trump Torched Over Report He’d OK Russia Controlling Parts of Ukraine
Trump Order to Keep ‘Jalopy’ Coal Plant Open Costs Taxpayers Over $100 Million
‘Total Authoritarian Population Control’: Experts Sound Alarm on Trump’s Immigrant Attack
Trump Vows Not to Invite South Africa to G20 in 2026, Citing Conspiracy Theory
News3 days ago‘Theater of the Absurd’: Trump’s Attacks Cast Doubt on Bipartisan Funding Deals
News2 days agoMother of Karoline Leavitt’s Nephew Raises $17K After ICE Arrest
News3 days agoTrump: Nearly All of Biden’s Pardons — Including the Turkeys — Are ‘Invalid’
BAD PRESIDENT2 days agoTrump Vows Not to Invite South Africa to G20 in 2026, Citing Conspiracy Theory
News3 days agoTrump to Slip Away on Six-Day Florida Vacation as Americans Struggle With Soaring Costs
News3 days agoLayoffs Surge and Consumer Confidence Tumbles Under Trump as Holidays Approach
News2 days agoMTG Slams Argument She Should Serve Out Her Term: ‘Do I Have To Stay Until I’m Assassinated’
CRIME2 days agoTrump Sanctions Upheld Over ‘Frivolous’ Lawsuits Against Hillary Clinton, James Comey
