Gay Marriage: “Yes!” Says New Jersey Assembly Committee
Today, the New Jersey Assembly’s Judiciary Committee voted yes on a marriage equality bill, which moves the legislation forward into the full Assembly. The vote was 5-2. The “Marriage Equality and Religious Exemption Act” has nine sponsors and an additional four co-sponsors. Legislators patiently and in a rather well organized fashion (one legislator called it “classy,”) listened for almost seven hours to hundreds of citizens both in favor and against the bill, although the majority certainly seemed to favor passage of the same-sex marriage equality bill.
New Jersey Governor Chris Christie has promised to veto the bill should it reach his desk. Christie previously suggested that African-American civil rights should have been put to a statewide vote, and later was forced to apologize after many across the nation expressed outrage.
The comments from New Jersey citizens were varied and often cited religious liberty — some expressing how a ban on same-sex marriage enhances their liberty, others indicating how it discriminates and infringes on their liberty.
For a sampling of some comments from today’s hearing, read “New Jersey Gay Marriage: Legislature Hearing Today – Here’s A Sample.”
Among those lawmakers opposed to the bill, one Republican after spending seven hours listening to hundreds of people explain their position on marriage equality, claimed he had not heard anything at all that convinced him that society would benefit from marriage equality.
Another Republican lawmaker, Holly Schepisi, whose first day on the job was today, said she only received three emails in favor of the bill, and over 50 opposed too it, an indication that pro-equality individuals need to work harder in New Jersey — which is not to say Garden State Equality has not. Garden State Equality for years, and recently, has worked tirelessly on same-sex marriage and does a great job. We, as individuals, need to do our part as well.
Schepisi voted no, claiming she thought there might be a way to creatively redefine all marriages, an ignorant comment, albeit probably an honest attempt at reaching compromise.
Compromise is not an option. Compromise is “separate but equal,” which is never equal.
Special thanks to Zack Ford at Think Progess!
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.