• Source: Facebook
  • Anti-Gay Constitutional Amendment Introduced in Missouri Senate

    New "Religious Freedom" legislation introduced in the Missouri Senate on Wednesday could bring an anti-LGBT constitutional amendment before Missouri voters this November.

    SJR 39, introduced by State Sen. Bob Onder (R-St. Charles), would ask voters to prohibit the state from imposing a penalty on a religious organization or individual who acts in accordance with a sincere religious belief concerning same-sex marriage, which includes the refusal to perform a same-sex marriage ceremony or allow a same-sex wedding ceremony to be performed on the religious organization's property. 

    The bill further says the state shall not impose a penalty on an individual who declines either to be a participant in a marriage or wedding ceremony or to provide goods or services of expressional or artistic creation for such a marriage or ceremony or an ensuing celebration thereof, because of a sincere religious belief concerning marriage between two persons of the same sex.

    "We agree that freedom of religion is an important, deeply-held value, which is why it is protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution as well as in current religious exemptions of the Missouri Human Rights Act," said Steph Perkins, Executive Director of PROMO, Missouri's statewide LGBT advocacy organization. 

    "I hope we can also agree that customers of businesses that are open to the public should be treated with dignity and respect, including those who are gay or transgender," said Perkins. 

    SJR 39, which would amend article I of the Constitution of the state of Missouri, grows the number of anti-LGBT bills in the General Assembly to eight. 

    Last year, PROMO helped to defeat a record nine anti-LGBT bills while continuing to grow support for the perennial Missouri Non-discrimination Act or MONA. The legislation has been introduced in both chambers of the General Assembly since 1998 and would add LGBT protections to Missouri's Human Rights Statute regarding housing, employment and public accommodation.

     

    Image via Facebook

     

    Colin Murphy is the editor of Boom Magazine. This article was originally published at Boom and is republished here with permission.

    Get weekly news & updates
    Subscribe
    Support our work DONATE



    Register to VOTE

    Showing 7 comments

    Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.

    • commented 2016-02-22 13:47:47 -0500
      Start working at home with Google! It’s by-far the best job I’ve had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this – 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $100 per hour. I work through this link

      Clik This Link inYour Browser……
      ➨➨➨➨➨➨➨➨ www.NetWage30.com

    • commented 2016-02-22 13:46:50 -0500
      Start working at home with Google! It’s by-far the best job I’ve had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this – 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $100 per hour. I work through this link

      Clik This Link inYour Browser……
      ➨➨➨➨➨➨➨➨ www.NetWage30.com

    • commented 2016-02-21 23:51:56 -0500
      My religion includes sacrificing my enemies to my gods on an altar by ripping their still-beating hearts out and forcing them to see it before they die. Is this covered? The viability of our crops is kinda dependent upon this.

    • commented 2016-02-21 20:13:40 -0500
      Look at those veneers! No doubt hiding his fangs.

    • commented 2016-02-21 20:00:45 -0500
      Start working at home with Google! It’s by-far the best job I’ve had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this – 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $100 per hour. I work through this link

      Clik This Link inYour Browser……

      ====>>>>>> w­w­w.­ne­tj­oi­n­1­0­­.­­c­­o­m

    • commented 2016-02-21 18:57:46 -0500
      The freedom of religion protected under the 1st Amendment was never intended to supercede the civil rights of others. Nor was it intended to exempt the believer from adherence to our laws.
      Further theit legislation would deprive a recognized minority of the full protection of the law

    • commented 2016-02-21 16:57:36 -0500
      If a person does not believe in the most fundamental Human Right and American Value – EQUALITY – then that person is anti-human rights and un-American.

      “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal…”

    Your rights, your movement.
    Join today:
    Your rights, your movement.
    Join today: