Connect with us

News

Mace Defends ‘Racist’ and ‘Sexist’ Attack on Kamala Harris: ‘Taking on the Radical Left’

Published

on

U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC), under fire for refusing to correctly pronounce Vice President Kamala Harris’s first name, claiming she was being labeled “racist,” and complaining about how CNN panelists Thursday night were attacking her because she is a woman, defended what are being called her “racist” and “sexist” remarks by saying she was “taking on the Radical Left.”


“I will never bend a knee to the Radical Left coming after me,” Rep. Mace also said Friday afternoon, continuing to defend her remarks more than 12 hours later as clips and criticism of her CNN appearance went viral. Mace made at least 15 posts on the social media platform X attempting to defend her comments.

READ MORE: Harris’s New Plan to Lower Housing Costs Hailed by Experts: ‘As Monumental’ as ObamaCare

The South Carolina Congresswoman, known for directing her staff to book her on cable news shows between one and three times a day and up to six times a week on local television stations, Thursday on CNN repeatedly insisted on mispronouncing the name of the Vice President and Democratic presidential nominee. When called out on it by several CNN panelists, Mace replied, “I will say Kamala’s name any way that I want to.”

When Professor of African American Studies Michael Eric Dyson called her out for intentionally mispronouncing “Kamala,” Mace replied, “I just did and I’ll do it again.”

“This Congresswoman is a wonderful human being,” Dr. Dyson said, “but when you disrespect Kamala Harris by saying you will call her whatever you want, I know you don’t intend it to be that way, that’s the history and legacy of white disregard for the humanity of Black people.”

“So now you’re calling me racist,” Rep. Mace responded. “That is BS. That is complete BS.”

READ MORE: ‘Make Them Pay’: JD Vance Says ‘Destroy’ Those Who Oppose Values That Make America Great

“You don’t have to intend racism to accomplish it,” Dyson continued, before the panel discussion spiraled out of hand, with Mace refusing to listen to other participants.

Mace went on to claim the Vice President disrespects women, and “doesn’t know what a woman is,” before Dyson shot back: “White women don’t have the ability to tell Black women who paid the price of blood to make this country what it is to tell them they’re not real women.”

But Mace also refused to criticize Donald Trump when CNN host Abby Phillip asked if the ex-president should stop saying Vice President Harris is “not actually Black.”

“Well, I mean, I, I, I didn’t hear him say it, I didn’t hear what he said about her race, I’m not gonna weigh in on her race,” Mace insisted. “The fact that you talk to women this way is ridiculous.”

Critics are blasting Congresswoman Mace.

“Being unable to pronounce names isn’t taking on the radical left. And coffee won’t help your apparently low levels of education,” The Nation’s justice correspondent Elie Mystal wrote, responding to Mace’s “Much needed caffeine” post.

“Having your name mispronounced isn’t anything new to minorities,” observed MSNBC legal correspondent Katie Phang. “For a lot of us, we’ve spent our entire lives having to correct folks. I like to give them the benefit of the doubt that it’s unintentional or a mistake. BUT when Republicans like Nancy Mace repeatedly & intentionally mispronounce @KamalaHarris’ name, it’s a nasty macro-aggression and it deserves to be called out. Especially when Mace has the gall to bleat that she’ll ‘say her name any way she wants to.'”

“The refusal to call a Black women Mrs, Miss, or Ma’am in 1964 was racist. The refusal of a Congresswoman to call the VP by her name in 2024 is not only racist, but sexist,” wrote civil rights attorney and Harvard Kennedy Professor Cornell William Brooks, the former president and CEO of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). “It is sexist for a woman to either choose or be forced to imitate the racism of Misogynist in Chief Trump.”

Watch the videos above or at this link.

READ MORE: ‘My Wife Had This Baby’: JD Vance Trounced for ‘Misogynistic’ Views on Women and Family

 

 

 

There's a reason 10,000 people subscribe to NCRM. You can get the news before it breaks just by subscribing, plus you can learn something new every day.
Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

Helicopter Circles as Gloved Officers Test Grass Over Apparent ′86 47′ Mall Message

Published

on

Emergency workers swarmed the National Mall in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday to investigate massive numbers etched into the grass that appeared to spell out an “86 47” message.

U.S. Park Police, the Washington, D.C. Fire Department, and the National Guard responded to the appearance of the numbers, which could only be read from a distant height, such as the top of the Washington Monument, according to The Washington Post. A large “8” can distinctly be seen from an Earth Cam atop the structure.

“The numerals 8, 6 and 7 were visible, but the 4 wasn’t clearly etched into the grass,” the Post reported. “It remains unclear how the markings were made. The term ’86’ is restaurant industry slang that generally refers to the unavailability of an item or a customer’s removal. Trump allies have argued it can also mean to kill someone.”

Trump is the 47th president.

In its indictment of former FBI Director James Comey, the Trump Justice Department suggested that the term “86 47” could be interpreted as intent to harm President Trump.

On the ground, the numbers only appeared as brownish patches in the grass.

“Multiple emergency vehicles could be seen encircling the grass around 1 p.m. A team of officers stood over brown patches in the grass, wearing gloves, and appeared to be testing the grass with materials from a yellow case,” the Post reported. “Pedestrians were not permitted to walk on the grass, and a Park Service helicopter circled overhead.”

A White House spokesperson in an email to the Post said, “Anyone who engages in or endorses political violence or assassination culture must be condemned in the harshest terms possible.”

They added: “They should also immediately seek psychiatric help to treat their severe and debilitating case of Trump Derangement Syndrome that has warped their brains and made them sick in the head.

CBS News reported that an Interior Department spokesperson called it “deranged vandalism” that “will not be tolerated.”

“Any threat against the President is taken very seriously by the Department, and our U.S. Park Police will investigate this incident and hold those responsible accountable,” they added.

 

Image via Reuters 

 

Continue Reading

News

CNN Fact-Checker: Trump Using ‘Time-Tested Conspiracist Tactic’

Published

on

CNN fact checker Daniel Dale is scorching President Donald Trump for employing a “time-tested conspiracist tactic,” namely, altering his conspiracy theory when the facts disprove it.

Dale reminds readers that when then-President Barack Obama in 2011 had to publish his long-form birth certificate, which proved decisively that he was, in fact, born in the U.S., Trump didn’t cease and desist — instead, he changed tactics and suggested that the birth certificate itself was fake.

“It’s a time-tested conspiracist tactic,” Dale writes. “And he’s now using it again when trying to explain why Steve Hilton succeeded in the California primary elections Trump had baselessly declared were a fraud and were being rigged against Hilton.”

“If you’re pushing the baseless conspiracy theory that the results of last week’s California primary elections were rigged against Republicans like gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton, it would seem highly inconvenient that Hilton has succeeded in qualifying for the November runoffs,” Dale argues. “But if you’re a seasoned conspiracy theorist, as President Donald Trump is, you don’t just stop telling a fantastical tale when it is contradicted by new facts. Rather, you simply adjust the conspiracy theory so that the new facts now fit within it.”

Trump is now alleging that “he had jawboned the riggers into submission,” says Dale, “but only in Hilton’s case, not the case of unsuccessful Republican Los Angeles mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt.”

For his part, Hilton hasn’t alleged any fraud, and, in fact, “he has said he has ‘seen nothing’ to justify any legal intervention.”

But Trump warned that California authorities had “approved” of Hilton advancing to the top tier for November.

“And then I hit them hard on that (Pratt’s defeat), but I started talking about Steve Hilton, who’s a fantastic guy,” Trump said, as Dale noted. “And I saw them say it was going to be two weeks before they knew, and I started hitting them. ‘It’s going to happen to Steve Hilton, too.’ It’s – ‘Watch, you gotta watch’ – and they approved Steve Hilton very quickly. They didn’t want, there was too much heat on them. The only reason he got approved – he had all the votes he needed, probably to be first place – but the only reason they approved Steve Hilton, it was going to be two weeks, they said, and then they approved him that night. Because the heat was on them, because they’re cheatin’ dogs.”

Dale calls Trump’s allegations “complete hogwash” and a “new round of foolishness.”

 

Image via Reuters 

 

Continue Reading

News

Party of Fiscal Responsibility? Bloomberg Scorches ‘Bitter Disappointment’ of GOP Congress

Published

on

The Republican-led Congress has been a “bitter disappointment,” the Bloomberg Editorial Board argues. It points to the body’s “lackluster effort,” its “ham-handed” cuts to medical coverage, and how it dropped much of its agenda “in favor of writing big checks.”

“After two years in charge of a unified federal government, what has the Republican Party accomplished? If current polling is any indication, not enough,” the Editorial Board writes. It points to the Senate’s $70 billion budget reconciliation bill — which passed the House of Representatives — “that will mostly add to a glut of immigration funding.”

This GOP Congress has “fattened the budgets of immigration authorities while doing little to fix the broken incentives that lure unauthorized migrants in the first place (let alone to rationalize the legal immigration system).”

The Board accuses Congress of pledging to fight inflation, while standing “aside as the president has imposed a costly global tariff regime. After coming into office promising ‘massive reform’ to the health-care system, they’ve mostly cut coverage in ham-handed ways.”

Saying Congress “has done nothing to rein in long-term liabilities,” the Board calls the trajectory of the federal government’s debt “unsustainable.”

“More egregiously, the party that flatters itself as fiscally responsible hasn’t lifted a finger to rein in budget deficits,” it writes. “Last year’s tax cuts alone increased projected deficits by $4.7 trillion over the next decade. For all the turmoil engendered by the Department of Government Efficiency, the country’s spending problem has worsened decisively.”

The Board warns that the midterms are just months away, and Congress shouldn’t “congratulate themselves prematurely” — but it could take several steps.

Among them, it could “commit to respecting the Federal Reserve’s independence under new Chairman Kevin Warsh,” and promote permitting reform “to slash red tape, reduce costs, and accelerate energy and infrastructure projects.”

Congress could work on expanding housing supply and medical transparency, or “remind the president that his tariffs are harming workers and inflating consumer prices.”

And in an apparent rebuke, Bloomberg writes, “With federal spending threatening to slow income growth and drive up interest rates — or indeed prompt a fiscal crisis — they could take the minimum step of empaneling a commission to ponder the problem.”

 

Image via Reuters

 

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 AlterNet Media.