President Donald Trump Monday morning signed a bill into law ensuring first responders to the 9/11 attacks and their families will have greatly-needed – and, thanks to GOP lawmakers who delayed the process – long awaited financial support. But his remarks to 9/11 first responders invited to witness the signing of the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund in the White House’s Rose Garden has some outraged.
“I was down there [at Ground Zero] also, but I’m not considering myself a first responder, but I was down there. I spent a lot of time down there with you,” Trump claimed. His claim is false.
Trump claims without evidence to an audience that includes 9/11 first responders: "I was down there [at Ground Zero] also, but I'm not considering myself a first responder, but I was down there. I spent a lot of time down there with you."
Via CBS pic.twitter.com/SbPuKbDwxt
— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) July 29, 2019
It’s not the first time Trump has told this lie.
“Everyone who helped clear the rubble — and I was there, and I watched, and I helped a little bit — but I want to tell you: Those people were amazing,” he said, as Mediaite reminded Monday. “Clearing the rubble. Trying to find additional lives. You didn’t know what was going to come down on all of us — and they handled it.”
Trump, as many on social media were quick to point out, called in to New Jersey radio station WWOR on the afternoon of the 9/11 terror attacks to claim – falsely – that he now owned the tallest building in downtown Manhattan. It was a lie.
Some responses to Trump’s lies:
Trump keeps exploiting 9/11 https://t.co/Ot3NsqLdcs
— Andrew Kimmel (@andrewkimmel) July 29, 2019
— Dean Lopata 🤨 (@DLoIndustries) July 29, 2019
@realDonaldTrump So, you were helping the 1st responders on 9/11? That is so like you–a brave man, going in there bone spurs and all. You are now beyond delusional and dementia–you are flat out a lying sack of shit who needs to be locked up for the rest of your pathetic life!
— Joel W. Arnold (@JungleJA) July 29, 2019
— Lindsay Moon (@MoonMoonlj) July 29, 2019
Trump was not "down there" during 9/11 with first responders, and the only role he played was bragging on TV that he now had the biggest building in NY once the towers fell. Oh and lying about how American Muslims reacted to 9/11. https://t.co/5ZMyudJG4l
— Joy Reid (@JoyAnnReid) July 29, 2019
He is not mentally fit. What is the point of him lying about this? His narcissism is too malignant for him to continue. Can the Republicans AT LEAST say lying about being at 9/11 is too much? This isn't Trump "fighting back against the libs" – This is sick dishonesty. https://t.co/Po1YOlN6zZ
— Smart With Money (@swmplanning) July 29, 2019
Trump: I don't consider myself a 9/11 first responder. But I was kinda a 9/11 first responder. pic.twitter.com/NXh0KgumYA
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) July 29, 2019
it’s nice to see we’re finally recognizing the real victim of 9/11 https://t.co/klctZ1k5l5
— kilgore trout’s mom (@KT_So_It_Goes) July 29, 2019
there's a lot of awful trump phrases for a lot of reasons. but trying to claim he's akin to a 9/11 first responder has been one of the worst. pic.twitter.com/wTT4MHMldN
— John Whitehouse (@existentialfish) July 29, 2019
"I spent a lot of time down there with you," he says to 9/11 first responders.
Can you imagine what would happen if a Democratic president lied so blatantly about taking part in the grueling work at Ground Zero? https://t.co/HDqg7wwo7p
— Dan Zak (@MrDanZak) July 29, 2019
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
Far Right Rep. Falsely Claims ‘Democratic Machine’ Paid Insurrectionists – After Urging Them to Threaten Lawmakers
U.S. Rep. Madison Cawthorn claims “the Democratic machine” paid the Capitol insurrections who attempted a coup on January 6 to overt urn the election, after having told Trump supporters to “lightly threaten” lawmakers. The North Carolina freshman Republican made his false claim in the middle of the insurrection, when he took the time to call in to the radio show of a top Trump ally, Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk.
“I believe that this was agitators strategically placed inside of this group — you can call them antifa, you can call them people paid by the Democratic machine — but to make the Trump campaign, the Trump movement, look bad,” said Congressman Cawthorn, a far right grenade thrower who has already aligned himself with the QAnon crop of incoming House Republicans. “And to make this look like it was a violent outrage, when really the battle was being fought by people like myself and other great patriots who are standing up against the establishment and standing up against this tyranny that we see in our country.”
Barely weeks before the insurrection Cawthorn told supporters they could “lightly threaten” lawmakers.
His remarks went unnoticed until Sunday, when The Asheville Watchdog first reported them.
“Only hours earlier,” the Watchdog reported, “speaking at the Jan. 6 ‘March to Save America’ protest in Washington, D.C., Cawthorn shouted, ‘Wow, this crowd has some fight in it!’ He called the protesters ‘lions,’ and repeatedly called his Congressional colleagues ‘cowards’ who were hiding in their offices.”
“It’s on,” he told his followers on Twitter.
Here’s a portion of Cawthorn’s speech that day:
Here’s Cawthorn talking to TPUSA’s Charlie Kirk (segment begins 4:09:16):
MAGA Outraged After GOP Official Serves Up Easily Debunked Lie About Why SCOTUS Rejected Texas Voter ‘Fraud’ Lawsuit
“This man is a liar”
A video that shows a Texas Republican elector and State Republican Executive Committee official spinning a blatantly false tale is going viral on social media, with outraged conservatives insisting it is proof the U.S. Supreme Court, and especially Chief Justice John Roberts, are compromised. Some are even calling for the Chief Justice to be arrested.
GOP presidential elector Matt Patrick of Dallas, who cast his vote for President Donald Trump on Monday at the Texas State House, also took to the floor and delivered an easily-debunked fake news story about why, he says, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously rejected Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s frivolous lawsuit – joined by 17 other state attorneys general and 126 Republican members of Congress.
Had it been successful that lawsuit would have voided the votes of voters in four battleground states that Joe Biden won.
Remember, all nine justices said they would have voted against the case had they taken it, but they refused to hear in for lack of standing.
Before you listen to Matt Patrick’s speech, know that conservative attorney Ed Whelan – who clerked for Justice Antonin Scalia, is the President of the right wing Ethics and Public Policy Center think tank, was deputy assistant attorney general under President George W. Bush, and is a National Review contributor – totally debunked Patrick’s claims as “an absurd fantasy.”
Patrick’s entire story focuses on a supposed meeting the nine justices had in a “closed room” with no computers or phones at the Supreme Court to debate whether or not to take the Texas case.
As several experts have noted, the Supreme Court justices have not met in person in months, due to the coronavirus pandemic.
Patrick refers to a report he claims to have read “online,” describing it as something that “was written by someone who was a current staffer for one of the current Supreme Court justices,” he says in the C-SPAN video also posted to Twitter by producer Howard Mortman:
TEXAS ELECTORAL COLLEGE:
“The Justices went into a closed room…When Texas case was brought up he said he heard screaming through the walls as Justice Roberts and the other liberal Justices were insisting…afraid of what would happen if they did right thing…Moral cowardice” pic.twitter.com/JhnPN59wkP
— Howard Mortman (@HowardMortman) December 14, 2020
“I’ll just describe for you the report that I read, and you can make of it what you will,” Patrick tells the Texas group of electors. “He said that the justices, as they always do, went into a closed room to discuss cases they’re taking or do debate. There’s no phones, no computers, no nothing. No one else is in the room except for the nine justices. It’s typically very civil. They usually don’t hear any sound, they just debate what they are doing. But when the Texas case was brought up, he said he heard screaming through the walls, as Justice Roberts and the other liberal justices were insisting that this case not be taken up.”
“And the reason – the words that were heard through the wall when Justice Thomas and Justice Alito were citing Bush vs. Gore, from John Roberts were, ‘I don’t give a ____ about that case, I don’t want to hear about it. At that time, we didn’t have riots.'”
“So what he was saying was that he was afraid of what would happen if they did the right thing. And I’m sorry, but that is moral cowardice. And we in the SREC [State Republican Executive Committee], I am an SREC member, we put those words in there very specifically because the charge of the Supreme Court is to ultimately be our final arbitrator, our final line of defense for right and wrong, and they did not do their duty. So I think we should leave these words in because I want to send a strong message to them.
(It’s unclear what “words” he’s referring to, but immaterial to his false story.)
Here’s Whelan weighing in:
This is an absurd fantasy. For starters, the Justices haven’t been having in-person conferences. https://t.co/G7Pl6ORkNf
— Ed Whelan (@EdWhelanEPPC) December 17, 2020
And here’s Andrew Feinberg, Managing Editor of Breakfast Media:
I’m not quite sure what is happening here but this man is a liar. The nine SCOTUS justices haven’t met in-person in months. pic.twitter.com/FCLiMNwfBZ
— Andrew Feinberg (@AndrewFeinberg) December 17, 2020
Well-known political scientist Norman Ornstein:
Of course they did not meet in person. This is not just delusional. It is flat out lies.
— Norman Ornstein (@NormOrnstein) December 17, 2020
Here’s a conservative going ballistic, rather than checking Patrick’s absurd story. This is Dan Gainor, who works for a right wing media “watchdog” yet can’t fact check this speech:
— Dan Gainor, BA, MA, MBA (@dangainor) December 17, 2020
Of course the story is now showing up in right wing media, again, because they can’t bother to fact-check:
— ⭐ Choice News Network ⭐ (@Choice_News_Net) December 17, 2020
Right wing conservative commentator:
It’s now being reported that Chief Justice John Roberts didn’t want to take the Texas Supreme Court case because he was scared there would be mass riots.
We all know that means they would rule in @realDonaldTrump‘s favor!
— Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸 (@EvanAKilgore) December 17, 2020
Trump Attorney Complains Trump-Appointed Judge Who Ruled Against Trump Campaign Part of ‘Activist Judicial Machinery’
Jenna Ellis, President Donald Trump’s personal attorney and the Senior Legal Adviser to the Trump campaign is once again being mocked, this time for her near-immediate response to a unanimous 3-0 ruling against the campaign in a Pennsylvania election case.
Ellis says she and Trump personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, have decided that the three judges, who were all appointed by Republican presidents – including the one who wrote the opinion who was appointed by Trump himself – are all part of the “activist judicial machinery” in Pennsylvania.
She is also vowing to take the case – which the judges say has “no merit,” to the Supreme Court.
Ellis was quickly mocked.
If you supposedly have evidence of massive fraud, why did Giuliani tell the court “This is not a fraud case?” pic.twitter.com/YtkieyIDfi
— Helen Kennedy (@HelenKennedy) November 27, 2020
Epic failure but you go for it
The world is watching your circus
And the voters are laughing
Your move, sweetie https://t.co/rpUMkvASCg
— Kathleen Alice ☘️ (@kathleenalice4) November 27, 2020
“The activist judicial machinery” = three Republican-appointed judges in a *unanimous* opinion written by a *Trump appointee* that literally concludes that “the Campaign cannot win this lawsuit.”
— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) November 27, 2020
Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis are the Milli Vanilli of lawyer duos. Tons of attention, but all lip service. https://t.co/hOPpuZCpc7
— JeremyNewberger (@jeremynewberger) November 27, 2020
The grift will continue until morale improves. https://t.co/AbPPYZ0aYo
— Gary Legum (@GaryLegum) November 27, 2020
Down 58-0 and on our own 2 yard line with 42 seconds left in the game is exactly where we wanted to be all along https://t.co/GZat033yHt
— David Frum (@davidfrum) November 27, 2020
The "activist judicial machinery" meaning a 3-0 decision by three Republican appointees, the scathing opinion authored by a Trump appointee.
Does Trump pick "Deep State" judges or do they get corrupted after taking the bench? 🤔 https://t.co/a7bMsJlMY0
— David Burbach (@dburbach) November 27, 2020
This. Is. HILARIOUS. On just so many levels: hilarious.
If you read the opinion (which I IMPLORE you to read), the REPUBLICAN & TRUMP-APPOINTED judge(s) destroy the claims presented. Even the plaintiff himself (@RudyGiuliani) said, "This isn't fraud."
— Ken Schneck (@DrKenSchneck) November 27, 2020
That's an interesting way to spell "we once again failed to produce any evidence and the court justifiably told us to kick rocks." https://t.co/gHCqrVW49w
— L.A.Witt, etc. (@GallagherWitt) November 27, 2020
- FRAUD2 days ago
Busted: GOP’s Madison Cawthorn Paralympic Story Is a Lie – According to Athletes
- 'SENATORS SHOULD BE COMPETENT'3 days ago
AOC Smacks Down Ted Cruz After He Says Paris Climate Agreement Is About the ‘Citizens of Paris’
- News3 days ago
Dems Blast McConnell for Threatening to Filibuster Power Sharing Agreement – So GOP Can Block All Democratic Votes
- NOT HOW THIS WORKS3 days ago
‘How Can You Have Unity if You’re Taking Away Everything We Like?’: Fox News Blasts Biden for Scrapping Trump Policies
- CULTISTS2 days ago
QAnon Congresswoman Announces ‘I’ve Just Filed Articles of Impeachment’ on Joe Biden – Over Debunked Conspiracy Theory
- 'RESPECT AND DIGNITY'2 days ago
Biden’s LGBTQ Executive Order Is Just the Start – Here Are the Other Pro-Equality Actions the Administration Is Taking
- News3 days ago
Revealed: Real Reason Trump Didn’t Fire FBI Director Chris Wray – Total Self-Interest Says NYT’s Haberman
- News2 days ago
Federalist Society Co-Founder and 150 Legal Scholars Say Trump Can Be Still Convicted in Senate Trial: Report