Trump Again Promotes Right Wing Tabloid While Attacking NY Times, but Now He’s Also Threatening the First Amendment
‘Change libel laws?’
“The time for small thinking is over. The time for trivial fights is behind us,” President Donald Trump told a joint session of Congress February 28.
That was then, this is now.Â
President Trump on Thursday morning repeated his Wednesday attack on The New York Times, while once again promoting a right wing tabloid, The New York Post, but this time he added another target: the First Amendment.
“The failing @nytimes has disgraced the media world. Gotten me wrong for two solid years,” Trump tweeted Thursday morning. “Change libel laws?”
The failing @nytimes has disgraced the media world. Gotten me wrong for two solid years. Change libel laws? https://t.co/QIqLgvYLLi
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 30, 2017
The First Amendment is very clear about protections for the media, as are hundreds of years of settled law and court cases.Â
Elected public servants who don’t like the coverage they receive have various options. They can request a retraction, they can write a letter to the editor, they can also ignore a story. They can also sue, if they feel that is their only recourse.
President Trump has done none of the above.
Taking one of the above steps is what responsible officials do. On the other hand, fascists decide to take on the media and try to change – or gut – the nation’s laws.
As one top reporter who closely covered the Trump campaign notes, this is not the first time Trump has threatened this.
“I’m going to open up our libel laws so when they write…horrible & false articles, we can sue them & win lots of money,” Trump told supporters in Texas.
Trump – 2/26/16: “I’m going to open up our libel laws so when they write…horrible & false articles, we can sue them & win lots of money.” pic.twitter.com/LLJw2fICPW
— Sopan Deb (@SopanDeb) February 24, 2017
And on Wednesday, in response to a portion of Trump’s attack, The New York Times responded:
.@realdonaldtrump False, we did not apologize. We stand by our coverage & thank our millions of subscribers for supporting our journalism.
— NYTCo Communications (@NYTimesComm) March 29, 2017
To comment on this article and other NCRM content, visit our Facebook page.
Image by DonkeyHotey via Flickr and a CC license
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.