Why Matt Lauer’s ‘Commander in Chief’ Interviews Were an Unmitigated Disaster
Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Were Interviewed by Matt Lauer. It Didn’t Go Well. For Democracy.
Wednesday night NBC’s Matt Lauer held “Commander in Chief” pre-debate interviews in the USS Intrepid, with Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, the first almost-debate of the 2016 general election. It didn’t go well.Â
Why NBC News chief Andrew Lack decided Matt Lauer would be the perfect moderator is anyone’s guess. Rachel Maddow, whose MSNBC show is the new network’s crown jewel, and who literally wrote the book on the evening’s topic, was literally on deck to mop up at 9 PM after Lauer nearly sunk the ship.
In a nutshell, Lauer put the screws to Clinton, almost berating her over her emails, which have nothing to do with the event’s topic, while he effectively pour Trump a beer and sat back watching football. The systemic sexism was mind-boggling.Â
Almost immediately, journalists (yours truly included) took to social media with jaws hanging open, shocked at the journalistic malpractice NBC News (remember NBC’s CNBC GOP debate that was also an unmitigated disaster?) has foisted upon the American democracy.
New York Magazine’s Jonathan Chait penned a widely-circulated article titled, “Matt Lauer’s Pathetic Interview of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Is the Scariest Thing I’ve Seen in This Campaign.”
It begins, “I had not taken seriously the possibility that Donald Trump could win the presidency until I saw Matt Lauer host an hour-long interview with the two major party candidates. Lauer’s performance was not merely a failure, it was horrifying and shocking.”
Chait sums up the consequences, noting that, as it turns out, the average voter, especially those who are still undecided, “subsist on a news diet supplied by the likes of Matt Lauer. And the reality transmitted to them from Lauer matches the reality of the polls, which is a world in which Clinton and Trump are equivalently flawed.”
In other words, Lauer has perpetrated the myth that either candidate is equally acceptable.
Basically universal condemnation from journalists for Lauer letting Trump get away with Iraq War comments: pic.twitter.com/S0O2BvepDr
— andrew kaczynski (@BuzzFeedAndrew) September 8, 2016
Veteran journalist and Huffington Post editor-at-large Michelangelo Signorile offered this insight hours after the event:
Lauer out of his league.Pressed for time, he bullied a woman to answer quick (after obsessing on emails) then was bullied himself by a man.
— Mike Signorile (@MSignorile) September 8, 2016
The New York Times (which has little right to criticize others after its extremely offensive anti-Clinton slanted coverage,) reports,” Mr. Lauer found himself besieged on Wednesday evening by critics of all political stripes, who accused the anchor of unfairness, sloppiness and even sexism in his handling of the event.”
Thursday morning, Signorile followed up, rightly telling the Times that what happened Wednesday was their fault in part, after their anti-Clinton coverage:
Make no mistake @nytimes , Matt Lauer is a product of your breathless headlines & one-sided reporting of late. https://t.co/l6mwCQEaKD
— Mike Signorile (@MSignorile) September 8, 2016
Raw Story rightly points to CNN senior media and politics reporter Dylan Byers’ analysis, saying Byers “crushed” Lauer:
Critics blast Matt Lauer’s ‘Commander-in-Chief Forum’ performance: https://t.co/pYTgIVg4AL @brianstelter @DylanByers https://t.co/uXqdgSDmCg
— New Day (@NewDay) September 8, 2016
“Political interviews, forums, town halls, debates, these are really big, significant deals,” Dylan Byers said on CNN (video below). “They’re especially big, significant deals given all that’s at stake in the 2016 election. You don’t send Matt Lauer to do a political reporter’s job. Look, in a debate, it might be fair to argue that you can let the two candidates fact-check each other. But when it comes to these one-on-one interviews, these forums, you have to step up and play that role. That onus is on you, and Matt Lauer didn’t do that. He certainly didn’t do that with Donald Trump. He didn’t do it on the Iraq War. He didn’t do it on a number of other issues and frankly, this criticism that he went a lot harder on Hillary Clinton than Donald Trump, I think, is well founded.”
Rob Reiner also weighed in:
Watching DT spew his lies and never answer any questions, and Matt Lauer never holding him accountable for anything was sickening.
— Rob Reiner (@robreiner) September 8, 2016
Others:
Matt Lauer has a long history of sexist interviews, which he added to last night… https://t.co/Mhv4f1ghwf
— Mitchell Robinson (@mrobmsu) September 8, 2016
Lauer to HRC: “What is pi to the 6,000th digit?”
Lauer to DT: “What are your feelings on pumpkin pie?”#NBCNewsForum
— Craig Rozniecki (@CraigRozniecki) September 8, 2016
When the big lies go unchallenged, the little ones don’t even get noticed anymore https://t.co/rcXzotLD7L via @HuffPostPol #LaueringTheBar
— Richard Hine (@richardhine) September 8, 2016
After Lauer’s performance last night, I think my Wednesday article is more relevant now than yesterday. https://t.co/z6Mefwhgm2
— Brian Beutler (@brianbeutler) September 8, 2016
Last night was about the biggest moderator disaster in modern Presidential politics. Lauer and NBC will have to address.
— Tom Watson (@tomwatson) September 8, 2016
I still can’t believe Matt Lauer was chosen to play an important role in the operation of our democracy. https://t.co/gSSyt4T0ke
— Binyamin Appelbaum (@BCAppelbaum) September 8, 2016
Matt Lauer gets paid $20 million a year.
At that price seems like he should come with basic factual info
— Judd Legum (@JuddLegum) September 8, 2016
Â
Â

Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
![]() |