Connect with us

Watch: Maddow Skewers Tea Party Congressman For Jaw-Dropping SOTU Comments

Published

on

var addthis_config = {“data_track_addressbar”:true};After the SOTU, Rachel Maddow interviewed GOP Congressman Tim Huelskamp, and challenged what she called his “spectacularly disingenuous” comments.

At his State of the Union address, President Barack Obama last night delivered a solid speech and a surprisingly upbeat and positive olive branch to Republicans. Of course, the GOP had their marching orders, talking points, and pre-conceived notions, so whether or not they actually listened and heard the President’s speech will forever remain a mystery.

Take Tea Party Republican U.S. Congressman Tim Huelskamp of Kansas.

During and after the State of the Union, Huelskamp’s Twitter stream read like a diatribe from a Bellevue patient.

But it was this tweet that really stuck in the craw of many, including MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow:

Maddow challenged Rep. Huelskamp on-air over his strange and arrogant comments.

“I have to ask you if that was tongue in cheek — do you really believe that was ‘politicizing’ the military,” she asked.

Hueskamp responded that the GOP “actually invited our own veteran,” and claimed that the President “ran against the military” and “highlights them when it helps politically.”

Never mind that President Obama spent hours with the troops during his vacation in Hawaii over Christmas, and made most of that visit off-limits to the press — so it wasn’t “political.”

Maddow would not let the Tea Party member from Kansas get away with that.

“How did he run against the military?”

“It’s pretty clear — he wanted to bring the troops home, he wants to close Gitmo, he wants to do all kinds of things…”

“Is bringing the troops home your definition of being against the military?”

That’s when Huelskamp lost it.

“You know they’re hiding the truth on Benghazi,” Rep. Huelskamp said. “We’re looking for them to come forward, let those folks testify who were on the ground.”

“It’s also the responsibility of Hillary Clinton,” he added. “Just a few months ago she said what difference does it make? Two days ago she says it was the biggest regret in her life.”

As the interview progressed, Huelskamp accused Maddow of “being a cheerleader” instead of a journalist.

“Did you just call me a cheerleader?” she asked, shocked.

“I don’t know, maybe you have that history,” Huelskamp quipped. “If it was Bush, you would be jumping and screaming.”

“You’re amazing,” Maddow responded, clearly shocked and irritated.

Huelskamp, increasingly angered and tongue-tied, went on to claim, ridiculously, that, Obama in the speech had “said, ‘I don’t like the American people, who they elect. That’s what the president was saying. He said, ‘I don’t like Congress, I don’t like the American people who sent these people up here.'”

Watch the entire interview.

And scroll through the tweets of viewers from during and immediately after the interview, which we published below.

http://player.theplatform.com/p/2E2eJC/EmbeddedOffSite?guid=n_msnbc_sotu_tim_140128

//storify.com/davidbadash/maddow-skewers-tea-party-congressman-over-sotu-com/embed

[View the story “Maddow Skewers Tea Party Congressman For Jaw-Dropping SOTU Comments” on Storify]

There's a reason 10,000 people subscribe to NCRM. You can get the news before it breaks just by subscribing, plus you can learn something new every day.
Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

FBI Witnesses in Georgia Case Didn’t Understand ‘How Elections Work’ Says Expert

Published

2 days ago

on

March 27, 2026

By

An election expert told a federal judge that the witnesses the FBI relied on during its investigation that led to the seizure of ballots from the 2020 election in Fulton County, Georgia, misunderstood elections.

Former U.S. Election Assistance Commission official Ryan Macias, “testified that the list of irregularities the FBI identified didn’t represent a crime and that the witnesses the government based their investigation on appeared misinformed,” NBC News reported.

The witnesses the FBI cited “use contradictory terminology and it represents a misunderstanding of how elections work,” Macias said.

Macias also told a judge that the evidence the Bureau used to justify the controversial seizure of the ballots “doesn’t make sense.”

READ MORE: ‘Wrong Answer’: Conservative CPAC Audience Cheers Impeachment

Fulton County officials submitted a sworn declaration from Macias, who had advised the county during the 2020 election, the Associated Press reported. He said the Justice Department’s affidavit contains “a multitude of false or misleading statements and omissions” and offered explanations for the alleged “deficiencies.”

Fulton County is suing to force the return of its election materials. Its attorney, Abbe Lowell “criticized the government’s witnesses and information, which were laid out in a since-unsealed sworn affidavit that is ‘full of inaccuracies,'” NBC reported.

Lowell also argued that the government’s witness list couldn’t be trusted because it included “someone who was sanctioned twice by the courts for lying about elections.”

The person Lowell referred to, NBC reported, was Kurt Olsen, “a Republican who tried to overturn the 2020 election results. Olsen was appointed by President Donald Trump to investigate the 2020 election from within his administration.”

Lowell also told the judge that there was no crime because there was no proof of intentional wrongdoing.

“The only element that turns normal election irregularities into crime is intent,” he said.

READ MORE: Rubio Vows to ‘Destroy’ Parts of Iran’s Military Trump Bragged Were Already Decimated

 

Image via Reuters 

Continue Reading

News

Rubio Vows to ‘Destroy’ Parts of Iran’s Military Trump Bragged Were Already Decimated

Published

2 days ago

on

March 27, 2026

By

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio appeared to contradict the commander-in-chief on Friday, speaking on the administration’s war efforts in Iran.

“We’re going to destroy their navy, we are going to destroy their air force, and we are going to significantly destroy their missile launchers so they can never hide behind these things to get a nuclear weapon,” Secretary Rubio said, according to CNN. He also insisted the U.S. military is “ahead of schedule” on these goals.

But according to President Donald Trump, those goals were already completed.

“We’re having, by the way, a tremendous success, as you know, in Iran,” Trump told reporters on Tuesday. “We had one in Venezuela, and now we’re having one in Iran.”

“They have no Navy left. They have no Air Force left. They have no anti aircraft equipment left, no radar left, no leaders left. The leaders are all gone,” he said.

“Nobody knows who to talk to,” Trump continued, despite having also insisted that he is in productive negotiations with Iran. “But we’re actually talking to the right people and they want to make a deal so badly. You have no idea how badly they want to make a deal.”

Iran has publicly denied it is negotiating with the United States.

CNN also reported that Rubio said “that the US can achieve its objectives in the Iran war ‘without any ground troops,’ as more than 1000 extra service members have been ordered to deploy to the region.”

READ MORE: ‘Wrong Answer’: Conservative CPAC Audience Cheers Impeachment

 

Image via Reuters 

 

 

Continue Reading

News

‘Wrong Answer’: Conservative CPAC Audience Cheers Impeachment

Published

2 days ago

on

March 27, 2026

By

The chairman of the influential Conservative Political Action Conference was stunned on Friday when his audience delivered an unexpectedly awkward response.

“How many of you would like to see impeachment hearings?” Matt Schlapp asked.

The audience cheered, applauded, and cried, “yeah!”

Schlapp quickly cut them off.

“No. That was the wrong answer,” he retorted, appearing somewhat embarrassed.

“How many of you would like to see impeachment hearings?” Schlapp was forced to ask again.

“No,” he quickly directed.

Things did not appear to be going as planned.

“Can someone bring some coffee out?” Schlapp asked.

“We’ve got to keep this House majority!” he then declared, apparently cognizant that impeachment of the president could be possible were Republicans to lose control.

READ MORE: The GOP’s Secret Weapon? A ‘Known Unknown’ That Could Swing the Midterms: Columnist

 

Image via Reuters 

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.