News
‘My Wife Had This Baby’: JD Vance Trounced for ‘Misogynistic’ Views on Women and Family
Republican vice presidential nominee JD Vance’s views on women and family came into greater focus on Wednesday after unearthed audio from just four years ago revealed him agreeing with a right-wing podcast host’s claim that grandmothers helping to raise children is “the whole purpose of the postmenopausal female.”
While many reacted to that line, some critics looking deeper into the audio latched on to another portion of the interview, a story which the 39-year old U.S. Senator and venture capitalist hand-picked by Donald Trump shared to support the podcast host’s views.
“My wife had this baby seven weeks before she started the clerkship, still not sleeping any more than an hour and a half in a given interval, and her mom just took a sabbatical,” Vance said. “She’s a biology professor in California, just took a sabbatical for a year and came and lived with us and took care of our kid for a year.”
Former Republican and former GOP communications director Tara Setmayer, a resident scholar at Harvard’s Institute of Politics and the co-founder and CEO of the women-led bipartisan super PAC The Seneca Project, weighed in:
“Is it me or does JD Vance seem alarmingly detached emotionally from his wife and family?” Setmayer asked. “And what is with JD Vance’s obsession with diminishing a woman’s value based on her fertility? And now post-menopausal roles?”
READ MORE: ‘Underestimating Harris’: Former Bush Strategist Warns Polls Off as Enthusiasm ‘Skyrockets’
“It’s all very weird,” she concluded.
Dr. Jack Brown, a physician and nonverbal communication and emotional intelligence expert who analyzed both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton on CNN during a 2016 presidential debate, honed in on Vance’s “My wife had this baby” remark.
“Note Vance did not say ‘our baby’ or ‘our son/daughter’ – nor did he use his wife’s or his child’s name. Profoundly non-affectionate, distancing, & objectifying,” Dr. Brown wrote.
He added Vance’s “the whole purpose of the postmenopausal female” remark “is beyond-words Creepy AF–misogynist AF.”
Shannon Watts, the gun violence prevention activist and Moms Demand Action founder wrote: “So JD Vance believes young women exist to find husbands; women in their 20s, 30s and 40s exist to have children; and older women exist to help other women raise their children. No fucking thank you.”
Journalist, lawyer, columnist, and author Jill Filipovic, who has reported on human rights and women’s health issues from around the world, wrote extensively on the latest unearthed Vance remarks.
“What Are Females For?” she asks at Substack. “According to JD Vance, ‘females’ are for reproduction, childcare, and not much else.”
“Vance has opinions about many different kinds of women,” Filipovic writes. “Those who don’t have kids are ‘childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives and the choices that they’ve made and so they want to make the rest of the country miserable too’ and lack ‘a direct stake in the future of the country.’ Women who care about their work and plan their families are suckers: ‘If your worldview tells you that it’s bad for women to become mothers but liberating for them to work 90 hours a week in a cubicle at the New York Times or Goldman Sachs, you’ve been had,’ he tweeted after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.”
READ MORE: White Born Again Christian Evangelicals Could Sway Election to Harris Warns CBN’s Brody
“Step mothers (and step parents generally), he has suggested, are not real parents,” she continues. “We have not yet heard his views on the purpose of pre-pubescent girls, but he has said that he believes even raped and impregnated children should be forced to give birth, even though their circumstances are ‘inconvenient’ — and Ohio, the state he represents as a US senator, has done just that, notoriously refusing to allow a ten-year-old rape victim to end her pregnancy (she had to travel out of state, at which point Republicans targeted the doctor who helped her).”
Revisiting Vance’s story about his mother-in-law, the California biology professor taking a sabbatical to help with his newborn child, Filipovic observes: “The concept of a male caregiver doesn’t come into the picture at all.”
“What was Vance doing around the time of his son’s birth and earliest months? Running a useless nonprofit and then joining an investment banking firm. His wife was clerking on the Supreme Court, the kind of rare career-making opportunity few law school graduates are ever going to turn down,” she notes. “Was what Vance doing when his son was born all that important? No. But it was paid, and he’s a man. And in Vance’s view, care work is women’s work. The idea that he might take a year-long sabbatical to raise his own son doesn’t come up. His mother-in-law, on the other hand, is purposed to do just that.”
“Yes,” Filipovic concludes, Vance’s “way of speaking is extremely weird. But his views on women and work are much worse than weird: They’re dangerous.”
READ MORE: Florida in Play for Harris? Election Could Hinge on ‘Inactive’ Sunshine State Dem Voters
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
 |
President Donald Trump and his administration are under fire for what critics say is a lack of planning for his war against Iran. The fallout is already being felt in the economy, from rising gas prices to sinking financial markets, and a myriad of other potential crises.
“I’ve seen a lot of Presidents fall short of their promises but I’ve never seen any President just doing the opposite of everything promised on purpose,” charged U.S. Senator Brian Schatz (D-HI). “Prices, Epstein, wars. Just absolutely racing to betray his voters.”
One hour later, he followed up, writing: “Did they think this through?”
The Atlantic’s Karim Sadjadpour earlier this week reported, “I have spoken with current and former U.S. officials privy to the decision making” on Iran, “who describe a total lack of planning and contradictory aims among those worried about the war effort and those more concerned about the war’s domestic political implications.”
Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairman Ken Martin earlier in the week charged: “Trump and his incompetent administration had no plan to get Americans out of danger after their planned attack on Iran. Now, American citizens are stuck in an active war zone. This is a complete disaster.”
READ MORE: ‘Dreaming of Gilead?’ WaPo Hit for Op-Ed Mourning Lack of Evangelicals in ‘Halls of Power’
On Friday, the State Department said that 24,000 Americans had returned from the Middle East, but thousands more remain. The “vast majority” of those who returned “were able to make their way home on their own through commercial means,” the Associated Press reported.
The rapidly rising price of oil and gas, and access to them, appear to be among critics’ greatest concerns.
“Apparently no one in the White House thought starting a war in the Middle East might affect oil prices,” lamented U.S. Senator Ruben Gallego (D-AZ). “Now families are paying the price at the pump for pure amateur hour.”
Longtime journalist Jim Roberts delved even further.
“Listening to White House official Kevin Hassett this morning is making it crystal clear that the Trump administration had no plan for dealing with the disruption of energy supplies in the Mideast,” he wrote, adding: “And now the Pentagon is trying to figure out how to protect ships in the Strait of Hormuz.”
The Atlantic’s Derek Thompson warned, “By April, energy experts say, the Iran War could be a full blown energy crisis.”
Citing reporting from the Financial Times, macroeconomist Philip Pilkington wrote that the “Trump administration forgot to refill its Strategic Petroleum Reserve before launching Total War in the Middle East.”
Patrick De Haan, the widely cited head of Petroleum Analysis at Gas Buddy, referencing President Donald Trump’s remarks about the price of gas rising, warned: “it doesn’t appear the admin is yet aware there’s actually a problem, so that means there’s nothing yet to fix. I do hope this changes soon.”
READ MORE: ‘Flashing Red’: Jobs Report Sparks Expert Warnings of Recession — or Even Stagflation
Image via Reuters
Washington Post readers are pushing back against the paper and an op-ed that laments what its author sees as a shortage of evangelical Christians in the “halls of power.”
“Evangelicals are 23 percent of U.S. adults and one of the most loyal Republican voting blocs, with 81 percent backing Donald Trump in 2024,” writes author Aaron M. Renn. “Yet despite six of the nine Supreme Court justices being appointed by Republican presidents, there are no evangelicals on the Supreme Court.”
The Supreme Court “is just one of the many elite institutions in which evangelicals are absent or underrepresented,” he continues. Declaring that evangelicals “have excelled in politics,” he points to U.S. Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) and House Speaker Mike Johnson as examples.
Arguing that evangelicals “are also prominent in well-run and profitable businesses with relatively low cultural impact, such as food processing (Tyson Foods) and retail (Hobby Lobby),” he says that “they are all but absent from the leadership of prestigious universities, major foundations, Big Tech companies, leading financial firms and large media companies.”
READ MORE: ‘Flashing Red’: Jobs Report Sparks Expert Warnings of Recession — or Even Stagflation
“A stronger evangelical presence in elite institutions could strengthen them while addressing polarization and public mistrust,” he continues. “The lack of evangelicals in the halls of power contributes to anti-institutional public sentiment. It also deprives those institutions of an important pool of talent.”
Washington Post readers scorched the op-ed and the paper.
“The author remarked, more than once, of the lack of formal education among the vast numbers of evangelicals,” wrote one reader. “He then questions the lack of said evangelicals on corporate and college boards and in executive offices. Am I the only one seeing a connection here?”
“Is this not a request for a new DEI program to benefit evangelicals?” asked a reader.
“I am an evangelical Christian,” said a critic. “Please don’t hold up Mike Johnson or Josh Hawley as an example of what Christ calls us to be. Perhaps the reason for our absence in the halls of power is the fact that the majority chose to elect an amoral, corrupt narcissist to be president. We should be absent from that depth of depravity.”
READ MORE: Revealed: The Real Reason Kristi Noem Was Fired
One reader encouraged the author to “go see the musical Godspell and see just how far off the mark the American Evangelicals are.”
“Since when did adherence to fundamentalist religious beliefs become a litmus test for government or institutional leadership?” asked a reader. “Aren’t we currently bombing a country based on that system? This ‘newspaper’ is devolving into an internet forum.”
“So now MAGA wants DEI for Evangelicals,” said one reader. “This is fantastic stand-up comedy material.”
“In some cases, not all, the author is confusing evangelical with fundamentalist,” wrote one critic. “The author is also narrowing the meaning of evangelical by using a political frame, not a theological frame. Many evangelicals define themselves via strict adherence to Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount (or the Plain) … I wish the author had explored at least modestly the increasing breadth of what the designation ‘evangelical’ represents in Christianity, not on Capital Hill.”
“Do you expect to be trusted in fields of science when you deny evolution?” asked a reader.
“Evangelical Christianity is the antithesis of intellectual pursuit, science, and progress,” wrote a reader.
And one critic, appearing to refer to “The Handmaid’s Tale,” charged: “Dreaming of Gilead, are you?”
READ MORE: Trump’s Iran War Triggers Gas Price Shock — Especially in Red America
Image via Reuters
Economic experts are stunned by the latest jobs report that found the Trump economy lost 92,000 jobs in February despite expectations of an increase of 50,000. Unemployment rose to 4.4 percent. Some are sounding the alarm that a recession — or even stagflation — could be on the way.
The Washington Post called the results “a striking loss signaling a warning flag for the economy.”
Describing the report as “grim,” NBC News called the loss of 92,000 jobs “a number that will raise alarms about the state of the economy.”
Gregory Daco, chief economist at EY News called the report “simply ugly.”
“The labor market is flashing red,” warned Professor of Economics Arin Dube.
READ MORE: Revealed: The Real Reason Kristi Noem Was Fired
“The economic story just changed dramatically,” declared Professor of Economics and frequent cable news guest Justin Wolfers. “Recession questions are back on the menu.”
Pointing to a chart that reads, “Job growth has stalled and may even be going backwards,” Wolfers responded, “This is not good.”
Navy Federal Credit Union chief economist Heather Long called the results “dismal.”
“Let me put this another way,” she continued. “The US economy has LOST jobs since April 2025. Total job gains since from May 2025 to February 2026 are now -19,000. Companies are not hiring in the face of all of these headwinds and uncertainty. And even healthcare is starting to slow down.”
Veteran finance reporter Ron Insana concluded, “Mini-stagflation remains the operating description of the current economic environment.”
“This is the ‘Welcome Back, Kotter’ economy!” Insana quipped. “It’s 1975 and the ‘sweathogs’ are in vogue … weak jobs and rising inflation bringing back stagflation like its 1975!”
READ MORE: Trump’s Iran War Triggers Gas Price Shock — Especially in Red America
Image via Reuters
Revealed: The Real Reason Kristi Noem Was Fired
‘Flashing Red’: Jobs Report Sparks Expert Warnings of Recession — or Even Stagflation
‘Dreaming of Gilead?’ WaPo Hit for Op-Ed Mourning Lack of Evangelicals in ‘Halls of Power’
‘Pure Amateur Hour’: Trump Slammed for ‘Absolutely Racing to Betray His Voters’
‘Pure Amateur Hour’: Trump Slammed for ‘Absolutely Racing to Betray His Voters’
‘Dreaming of Gilead?’ WaPo Hit for Op-Ed Mourning Lack of Evangelicals in ‘Halls of Power’
‘Flashing Red’: Jobs Report Sparks Expert Warnings of Recession — or Even Stagflation
Revealed: The Real Reason Kristi Noem Was Fired
‘Bad to Worse’: Mockery Ensues as Trump Trades Noem for ‘Erratic’ Mullin
News3 days ago‘Dereliction of Duty’: Trump Officials Slammed Over Failure to ‘Keep Americans Safe’
News4 days agoFBI Agents Probing Iranian Threats Fired Over Mar-a-Lago Investigation Ties
News3 days agoRubio Scrambles to Contain Iran War Revolt
News3 days agoIntel Expert Calls Out Trump Defense Secretary for ‘Criminal Incompetence’
News23 hours agoRevealed: The Real Reason Kristi Noem Was Fired
News2 days agoWhy Trump Is ‘Losing Control’ in Iran: Scholar
News3 days agoNoem Pins Botched Pretti and Good ‘Domestic Terrorist’ Claims on Agents on the Ground
News3 days agoIn 24-Hour Flip Trump Administration Now Plotting New Offensive Against Law Firms
