Connect with us

WATCH: One Of These Nine Anti-Gay Religious Extremists Is About To Become A US Congressman

Published

on

At ‘Faith & Family Forum’ Candidates Touting Anti-LGBT Bonafides Campaign To Replace Texas Rep. Randy Neugebauer

Whenever a bunch of GOP congressional candidates gather for a “Faith & Family Forum” in Texas, you know you’re in store for some pretty good entertainment. (See video above.)

And the nine candidates to replace right-wing Texas Rep. Randy Neugebauer in House District 19 certainly didn’t disappoint on Tuesday night in Lubbock — or, as it’s sometimes dis-affectionately referred to, “Lubbuttocks.” 

Neugebauer, who’s suggested repeatedly that same-sex marriage will destroy America, also famously called Michigan Democrat Bart Stupak a “baby killer” on the House floor in 2010. The year before, Neugebauer co-sponsored an anti-Obama “birther bill,” which would’ve required presidential candidates to provide copies of their birth certificates.

We know what you’re thinking — what a shame to see Neugebauer go! Never fear, though: Lubbock County Republican Party Chairman Carl Tepper, who co-moderated Tuesday’s forum, assured everyone that the good people of District 19 will be sending someone to Congress to fight for “Christian morals,” which he says are under “full frontal” attack, and he’s not talking about porn. 

In what might be the least newsworthy sentence of 2016, The Lubbock Avalanche-Journal reports that “all nine candidates agreed the courts should not be deciding same-sex marriage and would fight against it, would not allow transgender people to use restrooms according to their identity, believe in protecting religious freedom and are against abortions and would vote to halt funds to Planned Parenthood.”

Needless to say, with such a wholesome crop of candidates, West Texas Republicans are faced with an agonizing decision. And in order to ensure their nominee can fill Neugebauer’s anti-baby-killing shoes, they’re going to have to dig deep into the nuances of these candidates’ extremist positions. 

For example, retired U.S. Air Force Col. Michael Bob Starr assured the audience he’s anti-abortion, even in cases of rape or incest. 

“I would entertain an exemption for the immediate life of a mother as long as we’re having a conversation about one life versus another life,” he added. “That’s something that should be resolved by that couple in close consultation and relying on their God,” he added, apparently assuming that the dying mother would be in a condition to do so.

However, Platinum Bank President and CEO Greg Garrett went a step further, saying there should never be an instance of abortion, according to the AvalancheJournal. 

“The reason that I’m the only one that has no exceptions is I’m concerned that doctors will have an excuse to give a woman a reason to have an abortion,” Garrett said.

In other words, Garrett is so pro-life that he’s actually pro-death. He’s also apparently rabidly anti-LGBT. 

“No one should dictate what we should do as a private business,” Garrett said in the must-watch mashup of the candidate’s remarks on gay rights (above) from KLCW-TV. “We must get back to the free enterprise system, and we must take the problem of discriminating against businesses’ religious beliefs out of what we consider doing.”

Jodey Arrington, the former vice chancellor of Texas Tech University, said the Supreme Court was “supremely wrong to redefine marriage.” (See what he did there?) And retired surgeon Donald May complained about “discrimination against Christians by a small, vocal minority using the strong arm of a liberal government.”

Of course, words are one thing, but actions are another. And some District 19 candidates, like farmer Jason Corley, have a strategic plan for thwarting those lawless Supreme Court justices who voted in favor of same-sex marriage. 

“Republicans in Congress voted to OK these guys to let them in there,” said farmer Jason Corley. “When I go to Congress, here’s what I’m going to do: I’m going to jump up and down, stamp my foot, beat on the table and say, ‘No, we’re not going to allow this.'”

Good luck with that, Jason, but when it comes to detailed policy proposals, we’re pretty sure veterinarian Jon Key has you beat.

“We’ve got a bunch of nuts up there in Washington, and it’s time for somebody to go up there and crack those nuts,” Key said.

 

Image: Screenshot via KLCW-TV

There's a reason 10,000 people subscribe to NCRM. You can get the news before it breaks just by subscribing, plus you can learn something new every day.
Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

‘Looking to Throw in the Towel?’: Trump Mocked as Administration Again Switches Priorities

Published

on

President Donald Trump is drawing mockery after telling a CBS News reporter that his war in Iran is “very complete, pretty much,” as the administration’s military priorities continue to shift rapidly.

In the early hours of the war, Trump had strongly suggested it was about regime change, only to have his defense secretary days later specifically state it was not.

On Monday, apparently around the time he had a telephone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump said Iran has “no navy, no communications, they’ve got no Air Force.”

Secretary of State Marco Rubio made similar remarks earlier on Monday.

“The goals of this mission are clear, and it’s important to continue to remind the American people of why it is that the greatest military in history of the world has engaged in this operation,” he told reporters. “It is to destroy the ability of this regime to launch missiles, both by destroying their missiles and their launchers. Destroy the factories that make these missiles, and destroy their Navy.”

Days earlier, Trump had called for Iran’s “unconditional surrender.”

Professor of Strategic Studies Phillips P. O’Brien responded to Rubio’s remarks, saying: “If this is actually the new set of strategic goals, the Trump administration is admitting that they have strategically failed and this has been a disaster.”

Specifically referencing Trump’s remarks to CBS News, Professor O’Brien added, “So is this Trump looking to throw in the towel?”

Foreign policy analyst Jimmy Rushton observed, “No mention of removing the regime. No mention of destroying the Iranian nuclear programme. No mention of destroying Iran’s ability to project power via proxy forces. The administration’s war aims are constantly changing.”

Similarly, political scientist Ian Bremmer noted, “declaring victory and ending war with iran much easier with these goals. not mentioned: -regime change -uranium enrichment/stockpiling -attack drones.”

 

Image via Reuters 

Continue Reading

News

Trump Once Again Directly Contradicts Pentagon Chief on Key Element of Iran War

Published

on

President Donald Trump told CBS News on Monday that his war in Iran could be almost over — just after the Pentagon tweeted, “We have Only Just Begun to Fight.”

“In a phone interview, President Trump told me the war could be over soon,” reported CBS’s Weijia Jiang on Monday afternoon, less than one hour after the social media post. “I think the war is very complete, pretty much. They have no navy, no communications, they’ve got no Air Force.”

Trump added that the U.S. is “very far” ahead of his initial 4-5 week estimated time frame,” Jiang added.

The Commander-in-Chief’s prediction also came just days after Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth told CBS News’ “60 Minutes” that this is “just the beginning” of the war in Iran, as The Washington Post’s John Hudson reported.

Earlier on Monday, the Pentagon posted another Iran tweet: “This is just the beginning—we will not be deterred until the mission is over.”

READ MORE: ‘Blatant Racism’: House Republican’s Remarks Spark Backlash

One week ago, after President Trump specifically alluded to the war in Iran being about regime change, Secretary Hegseth declared it was not.

“Trump repeatedly emphasized regime change was a goal — and possibly even the goal,” CNN reported.

“America is backing you with overwhelming strength and devastating force,” Trump said to the Iranian opposition in the early hours of the war. “Now is the time to seize control of your destiny and to unleash the prosperous and glorious future that is close within your reach. This is the moment for action. Do not let it pass.”

“When we are finished, take over your government,” Trump added. “It will be yours to take.”

Barely days later, Hegseth told reporters, “This is not a so-called regime change war.”

READ MORE: ‘Good Luck in the Midterms’: Anti-Trump Conservatives Smell Weakness in the President

 

Image via Reuters 

 

 

 

Continue Reading

News

‘Tell Me It’s Satire’: WaPo Roasted for Op-Ed Linking Lattes to Destruction of Society

Published

on

Some Washington Post readers are mocking the paper and its op-ed that suggests a link between Starbucks’ lattes, and loneliness and the destruction of society.

The op-ed’s author, professor of politics Jakub Grygiel, writes that the “atomization of society begins with your morning coffee.”

He immediately points out that 46 percent of Americans have had a specialty coffee drink in the past day, and “54 percent of U.S. adults feel isolated and half of them feel bereft of companionship ‘often or some of the time,’ according to the American Psychological Association.”

Grygiel then says that ordering a latte your way is wasting everyone else’s time, which, he surmises, makes you feel lonely.

“As specialty coffee consumption has surged (84 percent since 2011), so has the loneliness epidemic. Just a correlation? Consider what your coffee order reveals,” he suggests.

READ MORE: ‘Blatant Racism’: House Republican’s Remarks Spark Backlash

“The salted caramel mocha latte, the iced brown sugar soy milk shaken espresso, the white chocolate macadamia cream cold brew are the triumph of hyper-individualization over communal norms,” he writes. “When you order a dirty spiced chai with oat milk, you are not only wasting the time of other customers in line but also are signaling that your personal appetites demand an elaborate, customized response. You are asserting your primacy, unique in the complexity of your desires, and stand apart from your nation’s simple rituals. No wonder you’re alone.”

Grygiel makes no mention of the fact that a significant portion of Starbucks’ business model is based on customized coffee drinks.

Some readers slammed Grygiel, with several questioning whether his work was satire.

“This is satire, people. This has to be satire. I know it’s satire. Please tell me it’s satire,” wrote one reader.

Others tried to bring the conversation back to politics, which is the author’s stock in trade.

“The atomization of society begins with you taking about coffee and not the Trump administrations efforts to destabilize our democracy,” chastised another.

READ MORE: ‘Good Luck in the Midterms’: Anti-Trump Conservatives Smell Weakness in the President

“I think the largest problem with American society is all the fascists, but that is just my opinion,” suggested a reader.

“I don’t know,” said another reader. “I think the American obsession with assault rifles and the fact that the number of guns in private hands in America far exceeds the population may be a bigger threat to our society. But that’s just me. I can’t remember the last time a salted caramel mocha latte killed someone.”

Others blasted the paper.

“Here’s some more compelling evidence that we’re confronting the end of days: WaPo is running this fluff piece while Trump is hard at work starting WWIII,” warned a reader.

And while some declared they “agree with every word,” others lamented the “absolute swill coming out of the WaPo opinion section these days.”

“This might be the thing that finally prompts me to cancel my WaPo subscription,” wrote an apparent subscriber.

READ MORE: White House Confirms Trump’s Shift That Pushes SAVE Act Further Right

Image via Shutterstock

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.