Did Marriage Win In Today’s Supreme Court Arguments?
The arguments have been made and heard and the analysis is flooding in. So, does marriage win the day at the Supreme Court?
After a good two-and-a-half-hours of oral arguments at the Supreme Court in Obergefell vs. Hodges today, everyone is willing to weigh in on the fate of same-sex marriage.
Will marriage equality be the law of the land?
It depends on whom you’re asking.
The National Organization For Marriage, which has lost (to our knowledge) every court case and practically every legal proceeding it has fought over the past few years, arrogantly issued a press release: “NOM Encouraged by Supreme Court Arguments; Demands That Justices Uphold Marriage As One Man, One Woman.”Â
That was followed up by NOM’s president Brian Brown writing a blog post focused on the word “millennia.” That word was used, falsely, by a few of the justices, including Anthony Kennedy, as in, marriage has been one man one woman for millennia – which is false.
LOOK:Â Scalia Insists Pastors Will Be Forced To Marry Gay Couples If Supreme Court Rules For Equality
SCOTUSblog, the preeminent authority on all things related to the Supreme Court had a different take.
“No clear answers,” writes Amy Howe. “It could turn out to be a nailbiter.”
“Significantly, Justice Anthony Kennedy at times also seemed dubious of the states’ argument,” Howe observed. “Even if same-sex couples can’t have biological children together, he posited, they might still want the other benefits that come with marriage.”
And she suggests we might see “a compromise, in which the Court rules that there is no right to same-sex marriage but still gives the plaintiffs much of what they are seeking by requiring states to recognize same-sex marriages that happen somewhere else.”
But one of the top LGBT legal analysts, journalist and attorney Chris Geidner at Buzzfeed believes same-sex couples will win, probably 5-4, or possibly 6-3.
LOOK:Â Justice Alito’s Gay Marriage Questions: Could It Legalize Polygamy, Did Ancient Greeks Allow It?
The New York Times reports the justices “seemed deeply divided,” and notes that Justice Kennedy, likely the deciding vote, “seemed torn about what to do.”
The Wall Street Journal characterized the justices as “divided and cautious.”
CNN reported the justices “appeared divided” and “skeptical.”
Elsewhere, David Kurtz at Talking Points Memo writes the court is “closely divided,” and the Washington Post said the court “appears split.”
Bottom line: it’s going to be a long wait until the end of June.
Â
Related:
Listen Now: Supreme Court Same-Sex Marriage Oral Arguments – Part I
Listen Now: Supreme Court Same-Sex Marriage Oral Arguments – Part II
These Five Lawyers Hold The Fate Of Marriage In Their Hands
This Is It: The Supreme Court Today Will Hear Arguments To Make ‘Gay Marriage’ Marriage
Â
Â
Image by dale baich via Twitter
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.