Breaking: Federal Judge Rules Against Same-Sex Couple In Puerto Rico, Dismisses Case
A federal judge for Puerto Rico has ruled that the government has the right to decide who can marry, declaring that Windsor is irrelevant.
United States District Judge Juan Perez-Gimenez has dismissed a case challenging Puerto Rico’s 1999 ban on same-sex marriage, ruling that the government has the authority to decide who can marry — and who cannot. The suit, filed in March, was brought by Ada Mercedes Conde Vidal and Ivonne Alvarez Perez, the first couple from the island to legally marry in Massachusetts.
The Washington Post tonight reports Judge Perez-Gimenez, who was appointed by President Jimmy Carter, “concluded the outcome was controlled by the Supreme Court’s summary rejection of same-sex marriage claims in Baker v. Nelson in 1972, a view that has been rejected by every other federal court since United States v. Windsor on the grounds that doctrinal changes have eroded Baker.”
While purporting not to decide the merits, the judge made plain his merits conclusions about constitutional arguments for same-sex marriage in a concluding section:
Recent affirmances of same-gender marriage seem to suffer from a peculiar inability to recall the principles embodied in existing marriage law. Traditional marriage is “exclusively [an] opposite-sex institution . . . inextricably linked to procreation and biological kinship,â€Â Windsor, 133 S. Ct. at 2718 (Alito, J., dissenting). Traditional marriage is the fundamental unit of the political order. And ultimately the very survival of the political order depends upon the procreative potential embodied in traditional marriage. Those are the well-tested, well-proven principles on which we have relied for centuries. The question now is whether judicial“wisdomâ€Â may contrive methods by which those solid principles can be circumvented or even discarded.Â
The judge’s strongly-worded ruling sets in motion an appeal to the 1st Circuit.Â
We’re asking for a swift ruling to end the discriminatory marriage ban in #PuertoRico: http://t.co/ssBtW05irb #LGBT pic.twitter.com/iZZfZWBRkS
— Lambda Legal (@LambdaLegal) September 15, 2014
The Supreme Court has refused to review any appellate court rulings since there have been no differences of opinion at the appellate court level. The 1st Circuit is believed to be composed of more liberal jurists.
Some responses via Twitter:
Carter-named judge rules Puerto Rico may “legitimately regulate marriage” to ban gay nuptials: http://t.co/WtS2MLfULp pic.twitter.com/AlcpVZWf65
— Chris Johnson (@chrisjohnson82) October 21, 2014
Out-of-step #PuertoRico #marriage dismissal ignores nearly 50 rulings holding that the denial of freedom to marry unconstitutional.
— freedomtomarry (@freedomtomarry) October 21, 2014
#PuertoRico #MarriageEquality: “are laws barring polygamy, or, say the marriage of fathers and daughters, now of doubtful validity?” P20
— Scott Wooledge (@Clarknt67) October 21, 2014
RT @EQCF: #PuertoRico federal judge upholds marriage ban http://t.co/PtxeYnDX1d // Appeal will be to the 1st Circuit.
— Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) October 21, 2014
Gay marriage: @LambdaLegal seeks summary judgment in Puerto Rico. Note: all other 1st Cir jurisdictions allow SSMs. http://t.co/BvbJpQD4lp
— Kenneth Jost (@jostonjustice) October 16, 2014
Puerto Rico Federal Judge: Only Supreme Court Can Allow Same-Sex Marriage – http://t.co/KMOUEh2EvO
— Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) October 22, 2014
PR ban on gay marriage upheld http://t.co/ING539PFba We’ll win in appeal. Equality is inevitable and unstoppable. PR will be for everyone.
— Pedro Julio Serrano (@PedroJulio) October 22, 2014
Â

Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
![]() |