Connect with us

GOP Congressman’s Bill Would Strip Federal Recognition From Same-Sex Marriages

Published

on

var addthis_config = {“data_track_addressbar”:true};

A Tea Party Republican U.S. Congressman has introduced a bill into the House that would prohibit the federal government from recognizing legal marriages of same-sex couples. Freshman Rep. Randy Weber of Texas says his State Marriage Defense Act “will simply require federal agencies to look to a person’s legal residence when determining marital status and application of federal law.”

Currently, the federal government uses the “place of celebration” standard when determining whether or not to recognize a same-sex couple’s marriage. In other words, if a same-sex couple marries in a state that recognizes same-sex marriage, the federal government currently recognizes that couple as legally married — regardless of their state of residence, the place where they legally live.

Congressman Weber says he drafted his State Marriage Defense Act because of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Windsor.

Amusingly, he also says he hasn’t even read last June’s Supreme Court DOMA decision on Windsor, as Jeremy Hooper at Good As You notes.

Weber posted to Facebook the above photo of himself talking with Family Research Council head Tony Perkins today.

Here’s the audio, thanks to Hooper:

https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/128736331&color=ff6600

Meanwhile, in a statement on his federal government website, Congressman Weber notes his State Marriage Defense Act “is supported by Family Research Council, National Organization for Marriage, Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, US Conference on Catholic Bishops, Concerned Women for America, and Heritage Action.”

Of course it is.

Given that it has received the endorsement of one certified anti-gay hate group – the Family Research Council — it’s actually surprising Weber didn’t get other anti-gay hate groups, like the American Family Association, the Public Advocate of the United States, Torah Jews for Decency, Mission: America, the Westboro Baptist Church, or Texas’ own anti-gay hate group, Tom Brown Ministries, to sign on.

“In recent months, we have witnessed the growing serious consequences of redefining marriage,” FRC head Tony Perkins said in a press release. “We’ve seen wedding florists, bakers, photographers who have been hauled into court, fined and even ordered to violate their religious beliefs by participating in same-sex weddings. And last month, a federal judge cited same-sex marriage in his decision striking down Utah’s law against polygamy. Another consequence has been the Obama administration’s chaotic actions through federal agencies that demonstrate total disregard for the 33 states that have not redefined marriage.”

Amusingly, Perkins’ statement does not offer one valid reason why same-sex marriage should not be recognized by the federal government.

Congressman Weber and his wife just celebrated their 37th wedding anniversary, which is recognized both by the federal government and by his home state of Texas — which does not recognize same-sex marriage. He posted this photo on his Facebook page:

// <![CDATA[
(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1”; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));
// ]]>

Congratulations, Congressman and Mrs. Weber, on celebrating 37 wonderful years together, never having to worry if you will lose your legal rights and benefits because a lawmaker doesn’t like your marriage.

Hat tip: Lone Star Q

There's a reason 10,000 people subscribe to NCRM. You can get the news before it breaks just by subscribing, plus you can learn something new every day.
Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

Another Georgia Republican Bails as Mike Johnson’s House Sees Even More Exits

Published

on

Another prominent House Republican from Georgia will retire, adding to the mass exodus Speaker Mike Johnson is seeing under his leadership.

U.S. Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) announced on Wednesday that he will not seek re-election. Loudermilk was first elected to Congress in 2014. He is the fourth Georgia Republican not seeking re-election, and joins (former) U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, U.S. Rep. Mike Collins (R-GA), and U.S. Rep. Buddy Carter (R-GA).

Loudermilk become the thirtieth House Republican to retire or seek a different office, according to the U.S. House Casualty List.

Last week, Cook Political Report’s Dave Wasserman reported: “Today, we only see 18 out of 435 races as toss-ups, but Republicans would need to win two-thirds of the toss-up column to hold their House majority.”

He suggested that Democrats are “modest favorites” to regain the House majority.

Speaker Mike Johnson’s margin over House Democrats is so thin that he directed Republican lawmakers to “take vitamins” in January.

According to Politico, “Republicans will expect to retain Loudermilk’s seat in suburban Atlanta in November, which he won by 34 points in 2024.”

Image via Reuters

Continue Reading

News

White House Shuts Down Melania Trump Event After Epstein Questions

Published

on

A rare White House event turned awkward and was ultimately shut down after First Lady Melania Trump faced pointed questions about using the White House to promote her documentary, “Melania,” and about convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s partner and accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell.

The first lady was meeting with the freed American-Israeli hostage Keith Siegel, and his wife, Aviva Siegel.

According to The Daily Beast, “things took an unfortunate turn when reporters took the opportunity to ask questions, setting their sights on the first lady’s box office debut and Epstein’s accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, who is now serving a 20-year prison sentence after being convicted for abusing young girls.”

Asked whether she felt it was appropriate to use the White House to promote her film, the first lady dismissed the question.

“It is not promotion,” she said. “We are here celebrating the release of the hostage; of Aviva and Keith. They were in Washington, D.C., and they said they would like to come over to thank me and to give hugs. There’s nothing to do with promotion.”

A reporter then waded into the Epstein controversy.

“There’s a call from Epstein survivors to have Ghislaine Maxwell moved to a high security prison. What do you want to happen,” they asked, which prompted her staff to try to end the press conference immediately.

“Thank you, press,” a staffer said, as the First Lady responded, “We are here celebrating the release and the life of those two incredible people, so let’s honor that.”

According to The Daily Beast, Melania Trump appears in the Epstein files, including in a “chummy” 2002 email to Maxwell, signed “Love, Melania.”

“Dear G! How are you?” it says. “Nice story about JE in NY mag. You look great in the picture.”

Image via Reuters

Continue Reading

News

‘Did You Lie?’: Bessent Backtracks Under Fire Over Prior Testimony

Published

on

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent faced a heated confrontation with a Democratic lawmaker and acknowledged that his earlier congressional testimony may have been mistaken.

His error, Bessent insisted — despite the view of many economists — was his claim that he had not said “tariffs are inflationary.”

“Earlier,” The New York Times reported, “he had denied having written to his hedge fund investors in 2024 that tariffs are inflationary. Presented with his exact words, however, he said that he was wrong to deny making those comments and that he had been wrong at the time about tariffs and inflation.”

U.S. Rep. Sean Casten (D-IL) read from a letter Bessent wrote in 2024 — before Trump won the White House.

“I want to read you a quote,” Casten began. “‘Trump will pursue a weak dollar policy rather than implementing tariffs. Tariffs are inflationary and would strengthen the dollar.’ Do you recognize that quote?”

READ MORE: ‘Serious Questions’: Noem’s DHS Facing GOP Senator’s Sweeping Investigation

“I believe you’re referring to a letter that I wrote, and tariffs could be inflationary,” Bessent replied.

“No, no,” Casten insisted. “It says ‘tariffs are inflationary.'”

Casten then asked, “Do you want to correct what you said to the ranking member when you specifically said that you did not say tariffs are inflationary?”

“You said tariffs are inflationary,” Casten continued, after having to repeat himself.

“Do you want to correct what you said to the ranking member? Or did you lie?” Casten then pressed.

“If I was mistaken, I want to correct it,” Bessent said. “And I was also mistaken when I said the tariffs could be inflationary, because — we’ve seen inflation drop to 2.1 percent.”

Many economists say that tariffs are inflationary because they function as a tax, in this case, largely on American firms and consumers.

According to HuffPost, Trump’s $181 billion tariff increase “ranks as the 13th biggest tax hike since before World War II.”

READ MORE: ‘End This Tragedy’: Conway Calls to Impeach and Remove ‘Fascist’ Trump

 

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.