In its day, William F. Buckley, Jr.’s National Review was highly admired and influential — regardless of your personal political stance. That was in the early second-half of the twentieth century. Today, the National Review is home to pseudo-intellectuals, bigots, and, now, we learn, rabid right wing racists.
The National Review’s John Derbyshire this week wrote “The Talk: Nonblack Version,” although frankly I have no idea why he felt it was needed. “The Talk: Nonblack Version”Â is a 24-point list of some of the most vile and 1950’s-like racist passages you could ever read outside of a white nationalist publication.
Apparently, Derbyshire wanted to make sure his kids — and you — are warned about (shhh… whisperÂ –) black people.
And so, let’s meet the National Review’s John Derbyshire. A 66-year old British American, Derbyshire is the National Review’s resident racist. Derbyshire also writes at Taki’s Magazine, where he chose to publish “The Talk: Nonblack Version.”
“Often described as ‘libertarian,’ TakiMag.com is in reality an extreme right, openly racist website, with aÂ list of contributorsÂ that reads like a whoâ€™s who of white nationalists, white supremacists, and upper-class pseudo-intellectual bigots, including Pat Buchanan, Steve Sailer, Peter Brimelow, Richard Spencer, Jared Taylor, and of course, Robert Stacy McCain,” writes Little Green Footballs founder Charles Johnson, adding:
TakiMag.com is often cited at the Internetâ€™s most vile sites such as Stormfront, because they put a thin veneer of academic pretension over the racist sludge. Neo-Nazis think it makes them look smarter, because TakiMag doesnâ€™t toss around the N-word with abandon (although Derbyshire does complain in this article that as a white man, heâ€™s not allowed to say it).
In the wake of the Trayvon Martinâ€™s shooting, many black parents have discussed the advice they give to their male children about not getting themselves shot in a misunderstanding with a white authority figure. Derbyshireâ€™s talk, on the other hand, is about how to avoid being harmed by a black person.
Derbyshire also recommends befriending some â€œintelligent and well-socialized blacksâ€ (IWSBs, for short) so that you can deflect charges of racism by noting that some of your best friends are black. Alas, he adds â€œthe demand is greater than the supply, so IWSBs are something of a luxury good, like antique furniture or corporate jets: boasted of by upper-class whites and wealthy organizations, coveted by the less prosperous.â€
Elspeth Reeve atÂ The Atlantic Wire goes one step further, exploring “Why John Derbyshire Hasn’t Been Fired (Yet)“:
Gawker’sÂ Maureen O’ConnorÂ asks, “How can John Derbyshire even have a career?”Â The reason is because John Derbyshire is very valuable.
Or at least up to now he has been. On Friday,Â fellowÂ National ReviewÂ contributorÂ Josh Barro, writing forÂ Forbes, is shocked that Derbyshire hasn’t been fired yet.Â In the last hour or so, more of hisÂ National ReviewÂ colleagues, have been criticizing the piece. Responding toÂ The Atlantic‘s Matt O’Brien’s question on Twitter, “Does @NRO want to be associated with someone who publishes racist trash like this?” senior editor Ramesh PonnuruÂ responded, “I know I don’t.” And Jonah Goldberg, the editor of National Review Online,Â tweeted, “For the record, I find my colleague John Derbyshire’s piece fundamentally indefensible and offensive. I wish he hadn’t written it.”
But that has not been the case with Derbyshire’s body of work up to now. And we have a theory why: The truth about intellectual magazines is that not all of their readers are as enlightened and forward-thinking and clear-eyed as the people who produce them imagine themselves to be. So the trick to pull off is how to give what those less enlightened readers’ want — and thereby secure their money either through subscriptions orÂ contributionsÂ — while still maintaining an air ofÂ respectability. Think of how your PBS station always trots out the stars of the 1970s concerts and River Dance whenever pledge drive comes around. That’s where Derbyshire comes in.
There’s a lot more good stuff in Reeve’s article — go take a look.
Oh, and by the way — you know who else writes at the National Review? Maggie Gallagher.
That said, now on to our show.Â Here are a few excerpts fromÂ “The Talk: Nonblack Version“:
(7)Â Of most importance to your personal safety are theÂ veryÂ different means for antisocial behavior, which you will see reflected in, for instance,Â school disciplinary measures,Â political corruption, andÂ criminal convictions.
(9)Â A small cohort of blacksâ€”in my experience, around five percentâ€”isÂ ferociously hostileÂ to whites and will go to great lengths to inconvenience or harm us. A much larger cohort of blacksâ€”around halfâ€”will go along passively if the five percent take leadership in some event. They will do this out of racial solidarity, the natural willingness of most human beings to be led, and a vague feeling that whites have it coming.
(10a)Â Avoid concentrations of blacks not all known to you personally.
(10b)Â Stay outÂ of heavily black neighborhoods.
(10c)Â If planning a trip to a beach or amusement park at some date, find out whether it is likely to be swamped with blacks on that date (neglect of that one got meÂ the closest I have ever gottenÂ to death by gunshot).
(10d)Â Do not attendÂ events likely to draw a lot of blacks.
(10e)Â If you are at some public event at whichÂ the number of blacks suddenly swells, leave as quickly as possible.
(10f)Â Do not settle in a district orÂ municipalityÂ run by black politicians.
(10g)Â Before voting for a black politician, scrutinizeÂ his/her characterÂ much more carefully than you would a white.
(10h)Â Do not act theÂ Good SamaritanÂ to blacks in apparent distress, e.g., on the highway.
(10i)Â If accosted by a strange black in the street, smile and say something polite butÂ keep moving.
(11)Â The mean intelligence of blacks isÂ much lowerÂ than for whites. TheÂ least intelligent ten percentÂ of whites have IQs below 81;Â forty percentÂ of blacks have IQs that low. Only one black in six is more intelligent than the average white;Â five whites out of sixÂ are more intelligent than the average black. These differences showÂ in every testÂ of general cognitive ability that anyone, of any race or nationality, has yet been able to devise. They are reflected in countlessÂ everyday situations. â€œLife is an IQ test.â€
(12)Â There is a magnifying effect here, too, caused by affirmative action. In a pure meritocracy there would be very low proportions of blacks in cognitively demanding jobs. Because of affirmative action, the proportions are higher. In government work, they areÂ very high. Thus, in those encounters with strangers that involve cognitive engagement,Â ceteris paribusÂ the black stranger will be less intelligent than the white. In such encounters, thereforeâ€”for example, at a government officeâ€”you will, on average, be dealt with more competently by a white than by a black. If that hostility-based magnifying effect (paragraph 8) is also in play, you will be dealt with more politely, too. â€œThe DMV ladyâ€œ is a statistical truth, not a myth.
And, Derbyshire’s final paragraph. Be sure to click on the link. Because, you know, all blacks…
You donâ€™t have to follow my version of the talk point for point; but if you are white or Asian and have kids, you owe it to them to give themÂ someÂ version of the talk. It will save them a lot of time and trouble spent figuring things out for themselves.Â It may save their lives.
Of course, the National Review can’t fire Derbyshire — that would be bowing to the left. And besides, anti-racism is just being “PC.”
UPDATE: 10:05 PM — National Review Editor Rich Lowry writes at NRO:
Needless to say, no one at National Review shares Derbâ€™s appalling view of what parents supposedly should tell their kids about blacks in this instantly notorious piece here.
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
Confirmed US Coronavirus-Related Deaths Surge – Double in Just Two Days
The number of confirmed coronavirus-related deaths in the United States has doubled in just two days, The Washington Post reported Saturday evening. The number of people who have died from COVID-19 now stands at 2000.
It was just over one month ago when President Donald Trump told the American people there were just 15 cases and “within days” the number would drop to “close to zero.”
Trump on that day said: “that’s a pretty good job we’ve done.”
“It took about a month from the first confirmed death for the United States to record 1,000,” the Post adds. “That toll has risen rapidly as officials have been warning the worst is yet to come.”
Trump’s Chilling Re-Election Calculus Is to Focus on Economy Instead of Lives Says Former Administration Official: Report
Two top Washington Post journalists are out with a stunning story Saturday morning, an inside look at President Donald Trump’s “risky push to reopen the country amid the coronavirus crisis.”
Robert Costa and Philip Rucker took a deep dive into this week’s developments, writing that “in private discussions, the president has been driven much more by economic concerns, according to people involved in internal debates or briefed on them. Trump has long viewed the stock market as a barometer for his own reelection hopes, and he has been distraught at the meltdown in recent weeks. He has been inundated with calls from business leaders, wealthy supporters and conservative allies urging him to get Americans back to work and stave off further calamity, even if doing so carries health risks.”
Then, this chilling insight from a former Trump official:
“There’s a fatalism that no matter what he does, he’s going to get blamed by half of the country,” said a former senior administration official with knowledge of Trump’s thinking. “If there is something he has some measure of control over, which is the economy, why not potentially try to take action? Yes, there will be a death toll, and he’ll get blamed one way or another, but in all likelihood, whether he gets reelected or not will depend on where the economy is and where people’s perceptions of the economy are six months from now. That’s where he is primarily focused.”
Read the entire story here.
Image: Official White House Photo by Tia Dufour via Flickr
Hours After Announcing He Invoked the Defense Production Act for Ventilators Trump Backtracks – for the Second Time Today
President Donald Trump once again is bowing to corporate America and vacillating on using the full force of the law to save American lives.
Two hours after the White House issued a statement announcing President Trump had invoked the Defense Production Act, directing General Motors to produce ventilators (quantity, timeline, and cost not announced), Trump is again backtracking – for the second time in as many hours.
After the White House press statement, Trump sat at the Resolute Desk, telling reporters in the Oval Office, “I’ve enacted the Act, we’ve used it three of four times.” That’s false. He had never officially used the law.
“We did activate it with respect to General Motors,” he continued, announcing he has ordered the car company to produce ventilators. He added, “maybe we won’t need the full activation we’ll find out.”
That’s not how the law works.
And now, at his daily coronavirus press conference, Trump again backtracked.
“This invocation of the DPA should demonstrate clearly to all that we will not hesitate to use the full authority of the federal government to combat this crisis. We thought we had a deal for example with General Motors and I guess they thought otherwise. They didn’t agree, and now they do, they do agree, and I think we might be able to pull it,” he said, referring to his direction under the DPA to GM to make ventilators.
Proving he has no intention of actually using the law, Trump scolded the $137 billion multinational corporation: “We let them know how we felt, and they can’t be doin’ that.”
It is unclear if Trump will actually use the law, as intended, to mandate GM produce the life-saving equipment. There appears to be no contract, no order, no number of ventilators to be produced, nor at what cost. There also appears to be no specifications, and no timeline as to how many are to be delivered when.
Minutes later, talking about ventilators being made, Trump says, “Hopefully General Motors will join the fray.”
He did not explain why he said “hopefully.”
Later, Trump explains that he doesn’t want to “get ripped off on price,” then says: “So General Motors, we’ll see what happens.”
- AMERICA'S FASCIST PRESIDENT2 days ago
Read the Letter Trump’s Campaign Sent to TV Stations Threatening the FCC Could Pull Their Licenses Over Anti-Trump Ad
- AYKM?2 days ago
Fox News Host Blasted After Saying ‘People Are Dying, and I Realize That’ — but ‘Women…Can’t Get Their Nails Done’
- News3 days ago
The National Security Council Gave Trump a 69-Page Pandemic Plan Three Years Ago — He Ignored It
- PEOPLE WILL DIE2 days ago
‘He Is Going to Override the Governors’: Outrage Over Trump Letter on ‘Increasing or Relaxing Social Distancing’
- PLAYING GAMES WITH AMERICAN LIVES1 day ago
Trump Whiplashes From Saying We Don’t Need 40,000 Ventilators to Calling Them ‘Much Needed’ – Now He’s Threatening GM
- THUG PRESIDENT1 day ago
Michigan Governor Says Medical Vendors ‘Being Told Not to Send Stuff’ to Her State — After Trump Bashed Her
- RELIGIOUS EXTREMISM2 days ago
Trump’s Cabinet Bible Study Leader Teamed Up With A Prayer Warrior to Pray Against ‘Evil Pork’ in Coronavirus Bill
- NOPE NOPE NOPE2 days ago
Canadians and Americans Mock US and Trump as President Weighs Stationing Troops at Border Over Coronavirus Crisis