Connect with us

UPDATED! USA Today’s Piece On Hollywood, Gay Characters, Includes “Transgendered”

Published

on

UPDATE: August 25, 2010 7:00 PM:

I just received an email from GLAAD, which reads, in part,

“USA Today has updated the article to reflect accurate terminology. I believe it was your letter that did the trick.”

Excellent! I’ll call that a win!

Thank you, GLAAD, and thanks, USA Today for acting so quickly.

###

Early this morning I read a piece in USA Today, “Hollywood now opening arms to gay characters, families.” Overall, it was balanced and supportive. But I had a few issues with it, so I sent an email off to USA Today’s Standards Editor, Brent Jones. I thought you might like to read it too.

Sadly, unless you want to blow your stack, I’d encourage you to not read readers’ comments. Yes, homophobic to the max!

Dear Mr. Jones,

It was nice to read Maria Puente’s piece, “Hollywood now opening arms to gay characters, families.” Given all the negative emotion surrounding LGBT relationships recently, an overall balanced yet positive piece was refreshing.

I did want to make one important point, however. As a writer who blogs on LGBT issues and civil rights, those who self-identify as “transgender” abhor the term “transgendered.” Just as we use the words “homosexual” or “heterosexual,” not “homosexualed,” or “heterosexualed,” someone is (or is not) “transgender.”

You may wish to review the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association Stylebook, or the GLAAD Media Reference Guide,

Given that the word “transgendered” appears several times in the piece as quotations, it might be a good idea for Ms. Puente to revisit her notes.

Perhaps one day you’ll run a piece detailing the hypocrisy and hate that are the foundation of groups like the American Family Association and Focus on the Family? Allowing them to be the representatives of the anti-gay movement in her piece shows how hateful their positions truly are.

But, again, overall, I want to thank you for running a balanced piece.

Sincerely,

David Badash

There's a reason 10,000 people subscribe to NCRM. You can get the news before it breaks just by subscribing, plus you can learn something new every day.
Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

Another Georgia Republican Bails as Mike Johnson’s House Sees Even More Exits

Published

on

Another prominent House Republican from Georgia will retire, adding to the mass exodus Speaker Mike Johnson is seeing under his leadership.

U.S. Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) announced on Wednesday that he will not seek re-election. Loudermilk was first elected to Congress in 2014. He is the fourth Georgia Republican not seeking re-election, and joins (former) U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, U.S. Rep. Mike Collins (R-GA), and U.S. Rep. Buddy Carter (R-GA).

Loudermilk become the thirtieth House Republican to retire or seek a different office, according to the U.S. House Casualty List.

Last week, Cook Political Report’s Dave Wasserman reported: “Today, we only see 18 out of 435 races as toss-ups, but Republicans would need to win two-thirds of the toss-up column to hold their House majority.”

He suggested that Democrats are “modest favorites” to regain the House majority.

Speaker Mike Johnson’s margin over House Democrats is so thin that he directed Republican lawmakers to “take vitamins” in January.

According to Politico, “Republicans will expect to retain Loudermilk’s seat in suburban Atlanta in November, which he won by 34 points in 2024.”

Image via Reuters

Continue Reading

News

White House Shuts Down Melania Trump Event After Epstein Questions

Published

on

A rare White House event turned awkward and was ultimately shut down after First Lady Melania Trump faced pointed questions about using the White House to promote her documentary, “Melania,” and about convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s partner and accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell.

The first lady was meeting with the freed American-Israeli hostage Keith Siegel, and his wife, Aviva Siegel.

According to The Daily Beast, “things took an unfortunate turn when reporters took the opportunity to ask questions, setting their sights on the first lady’s box office debut and Epstein’s accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, who is now serving a 20-year prison sentence after being convicted for abusing young girls.”

Asked whether she felt it was appropriate to use the White House to promote her film, the first lady dismissed the question.

“It is not promotion,” she said. “We are here celebrating the release of the hostage; of Aviva and Keith. They were in Washington, D.C., and they said they would like to come over to thank me and to give hugs. There’s nothing to do with promotion.”

A reporter then waded into the Epstein controversy.

“There’s a call from Epstein survivors to have Ghislaine Maxwell moved to a high security prison. What do you want to happen,” they asked, which prompted her staff to try to end the press conference immediately.

“Thank you, press,” a staffer said, as the First Lady responded, “We are here celebrating the release and the life of those two incredible people, so let’s honor that.”

According to The Daily Beast, Melania Trump appears in the Epstein files, including in a “chummy” 2002 email to Maxwell, signed “Love, Melania.”

“Dear G! How are you?” it says. “Nice story about JE in NY mag. You look great in the picture.”

Image via Reuters

Continue Reading

News

‘Did You Lie?’: Bessent Backtracks Under Fire Over Prior Testimony

Published

on

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent faced a heated confrontation with a Democratic lawmaker and acknowledged that his earlier congressional testimony may have been mistaken.

His error, Bessent insisted — despite the view of many economists — was his claim that he had not said “tariffs are inflationary.”

“Earlier,” The New York Times reported, “he had denied having written to his hedge fund investors in 2024 that tariffs are inflationary. Presented with his exact words, however, he said that he was wrong to deny making those comments and that he had been wrong at the time about tariffs and inflation.”

U.S. Rep. Sean Casten (D-IL) read from a letter Bessent wrote in 2024 — before Trump won the White House.

“I want to read you a quote,” Casten began. “‘Trump will pursue a weak dollar policy rather than implementing tariffs. Tariffs are inflationary and would strengthen the dollar.’ Do you recognize that quote?”

READ MORE: ‘Serious Questions’: Noem’s DHS Facing GOP Senator’s Sweeping Investigation

“I believe you’re referring to a letter that I wrote, and tariffs could be inflationary,” Bessent replied.

“No, no,” Casten insisted. “It says ‘tariffs are inflationary.'”

Casten then asked, “Do you want to correct what you said to the ranking member when you specifically said that you did not say tariffs are inflationary?”

“You said tariffs are inflationary,” Casten continued, after having to repeat himself.

“Do you want to correct what you said to the ranking member? Or did you lie?” Casten then pressed.

“If I was mistaken, I want to correct it,” Bessent said. “And I was also mistaken when I said the tariffs could be inflationary, because — we’ve seen inflation drop to 2.1 percent.”

Many economists say that tariffs are inflationary because they function as a tax, in this case, largely on American firms and consumers.

According to HuffPost, Trump’s $181 billion tariff increase “ranks as the 13th biggest tax hike since before World War II.”

READ MORE: ‘End This Tragedy’: Conway Calls to Impeach and Remove ‘Fascist’ Trump

 

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.