Connect with us

NY ♡s Gay Marriage

Published

on

Why Four ‘M’s Equal Equal Marriage

 

New York Governor David Patterson is pushing Albany for a gay marriage bill. New York State already recognizes gay marriages from other jurisdictions, and the Governor has directed all state agencies to bestow benefits on those legally wed regardless of gender. While there may not be enough support to pass a same-sex marriage bill today (Patterson said, “We’ll put a bill out and let the people decide one way or the other,”) support is growing. Here’s why:

  • Money: New York, the Empire State, is the financial capital of the world. Times are tough. Reports vary, but gay marriage could net an additional $60 million a year for New York. The longer it takes New York to legalize same-sex marriage, the less money will come in. If New Jersey beats New York, there’s a huge financial loss to the state and its residents. New Yorkers can already go to Connecticut, Massachusetts, Vermont, or Canada, and depending on where they live, either can be a quick drive away.
  • Momentum: Say what you will, but attitudes are viral. The tsunami of gay marriage news over the past week (Iowa, Vermont, Washington, D.C.,) has made a lot of fence-sitters rethink their position. The fact that Vermont was able to override its popular governor’s veto gives us hope that other lawmakers will stand up to the diminishing numbers the Right has on its side. That’s why they had to spend $1.5 million on that atrocious ad.
  • Might: The Governor, both New York Senators, the New York City Mayor, long-term support in the State Assembly, and the fact that finally we have a Democratic majority in the State Senate are all on our side.
  • Majority: 74% of New Yorkers favor some form of legal recognition for same-sex couples. 41% favor legal gay marriage, 31% favor legal civil unions. While the numbers need to be stronger, studies show over time, attitudes have been dramatically improving.

Additionally, FYI:

“A recent study conducted by the Congressional Budget Office found that if all 50 states and the federal government extended the rights and obligations of marriage to same-sex couples, gay weddings would generate almost $1 billion in revenue each year. According to other estimates, same-sex marriages could tack on more than $16 billion annually to the $70 billion wedding industry.”

There's a reason 10,000 people subscribe to NCRM. You can get the news before it breaks just by subscribing, plus you can learn something new every day.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

Can Trump Take Greenland by Force Without Congress? Johnson Won’t Say, Walks Away

Published

on

The White House has said that all options are on the table — including military force — for President Donald Trump to decide how he wants to acquire Greenland. But when asked if the Commander in Chief would need congressional authorization to take Greenland by force, Speaker Mike Johnson declined to give a definitive answer but suggested it might not be required — before walking away.

Greenland, an autonomous territory of the Kingdom of Denmark, is not for sale. The vast majority of its citizens do not want to be taken over by the United States. As for national security concerns, the U.S. already has a significant military foothold in Greenland through longstanding defense agreements with Denmark, including the Pituffik base.

Some legal experts say Trump would need congressional approval to use the U.S. military to take Greenland by force.

READ MORE: Dr. Oz: Seniors Should Delay Retirement to Boost the Economy

U.S. Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA), an attorney and retired Air Force JAG colonel, on Wednesday told members of the U.S. Armed Forces that any Trump order to use military force against Greenland without congressional approval constitutes an illegal order.

“There is absolutely no legal justification whatsoever to use military force against a NATO ally, against Greenland,” he said. “If any military member, including the generals on down, to enlisted members, if any of them participate in the use of military force against Greenland without congressional authorization, they are following illegal orders. That’s simply a fact.”

But Speaker Johnson, a constitutional attorney, appeared to have a different — and less definitive — take.

Desjardins asked if Johnson could clarify if any U.S. military force in Greenland would have to be congressionally approved. Johnson replied, “Uh, no, I can’t, because, um, it depends on what that is.”

READ MORE: Johnson Set to Jet to UK as Shutdown Looms and Majority Shrinks

“Is that not a congressional power?” Desjardins asked.

“Congress has a responsibility to declare war,” Johnson continued. “I think there is no scenario where we would be at war with Greenland.”

“Under Article II,” Johnson added, “the president has broad authority as the commander in chief.”

After some more back-and-forth, Johnson walked away, saying, “Bye, guys.”

READ MORE: House GOP Math Gets Brutal After Republican’s ‘Sudden’ Death and Another Hospitalized

 

Image via Reuters

Continue Reading

News

Dr. Oz: Seniors Should Delay Retirement to Boost the Economy

Published

on

Dr. Mehmet Oz, the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, is urging America’s seniors to delay their retirement plans so they can help boost the U.S. gross domestic product, a measure of economic activity.

Oz was speaking at a Trump administration press conference addressing new dietary guidelines.

According to PBS, the new guidelines suggest “more whole foods and protein, fewer highly processed foods and less added sugar,” and note “that Americans should choose whole-food sources of saturated fat — such as meat, whole-fat dairy or avocados — while continuing to limit saturated fat consumption to no more than 10% of daily calories. The guidance says ‘other options can include butter or beef tallow,’ despite previous recommendations to avoid those fats.”

Oz told reporters, “If we’re able to get the average American, who today retires on average, at age 61, get them just to work one year longer because they feel so vital, so strong, so bullish about their future — because they’re feeding their bodies nutrients that are essential to their high functioning productivity — we will increase the overall GDP of our nation by trillions of dollars.”

READ MORE: Johnson Set to Jet to UK as Shutdown Looms and Majority Shrinks

“So we will reduce health care expenses at the same time we jazz up the U.S. economy with trillions of dollars created by the productivity of American workers,” he added.

Critics were quick to blast Oz’s suggestion of working longer.

Max Steele, senior director of communications at the anti-gun violence group Everytown, wrote: “GOP midterm message to seniors: ‘work one year longer’.”

A Democratic National Committee social media account alleged, “Dr. Oz hints at raising the retirement age.”

Other social media commentators chastised the administration over the high cost of health insurance, groceries, and shelter.

READ MORE: House GOP Math Gets Brutal After Republican’s ‘Sudden’ Death and Another Hospitalized

 

Image via Reuters

Continue Reading

News

Johnson Set to Jet to UK as Shutdown Looms and Majority Shrinks

Published

on

As Mike Johnson’s razor-thin majority shrunk even further this week, the Speaker of the House is announcing a trip to London to address the British Parliament — just days before the U.S. federal government is set to shut down unless spending bills are passed by the House and Senate and signed into law.

Currently, nine of the 12 annual appropriations bills still need to be enacted, unless they are combined into larger legislation packages, or a continuing resolution is passed.

“If they fail,” The Washington Post noted, it will “spark another government shutdown just two and a half months after the last one, the longest funding lapse in U.S. history.”

Speaker Johnson may have a difficult task ahead.

On Monday, Republican U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s resignation and retirement took effect. On Tuesday, a California Republican, U.S. Rep. Doug LaMalfa, unexpectedly died at age 65, and another GOP congressman, Jim Baird, was hospitalized after an auto accident. He is expected to recover but his return date has not been announced.

Johnson — at least temporarily — may have to pass legislation with a 218–213 majority. With Baird sidelined, the working margin could be effectively 217–213, meaning he can afford to lose at most one vote on a party-line measure. U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) has a history of voting against the Trump agenda, and already there are other signs of trouble.

READ MORE: ‘Stalin-Level Propaganda’: White House Ripped for ‘Alternative’ J6 History in New Report

On a procedural vote for a Commerce-Justice-Science spending bill on Wednesday, Republicans were already scrambling.

“With absences and the extremely tight margin, the rule [vote] is going to be close again today. Dems are not expected to help Johnson,” reported Punchbowl News’ Jake Sherman.

Punchbowl’s Ally Mutnick reported that U.S. Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) “just said he is leaning against voting for the rule.”

“There’s plenty of us that are upset about what’s in it,” Burchett said.

Undeterred, Speaker Johnson on Wednesday announced his trip to England.

“Speaker Johnson will travel to London to address the United Kingdom Parliament on Tuesday, January 20 in honor of America’s Semiquincentennial celebration,” a Johnson press release reads. “Speaker Johnson will be the first U.S. Speaker of the House to address Parliament.”

“As our nation commemorates the 250th anniversary of American Independence, I am honored and humbled by Speaker Hoyle’s invitation to address Parliament,” Speaker Johnson said.

READ MORE: GOP Pushes Vote on Showerheads as Millions Struggle With Rising Cost of Living

 

Image via Reuters

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.