Connect with us

Right Wing Pundit: Rainbow Crosswalks Are ‘Discriminatory’

Published

on

A far-right wing pundit just cannot accept that the Confederate flag is a symbol of hate, racism, and oppression, but rainbow crosswalks are not.

Take a good, close look at that photo up top. It’s a rainbow crosswalk in Vancouver. And it’s the epitome of modern-day discrimination.

At least that’s what Breitbart editor-at-large Ben Shapiro, author of Bullies: How the Left’s Culture of Fear and Intimidation Silences Americans, says, after being set off by the popular movement to remove the Confederate flag from government buildings, state flags, and license plates.

This brilliant claim that rainbow sidewalks and a government building flying a gay pride flag are “discriminatory” comes from the man who said in 2013 that if you think Jason Collins coming out as gay is a big deal then you hate America because you think America is a homophobic country. 

EARLIER: Conservatives Demanding ‘Fascist, Anti-Christian’ Gay Pride Flag Be Taken Down

This brilliant claim also comes from the man who, upon learning last year that Stephen Colbert was taking over Letterman’s spot at CBS, claimed the now-former “Colbert Report” host acting like – portraying – a conservative was, in essence, racist.

After making his ludicrous claim that rainbow crosswalks are discriminatory, Shapiro unleashed a Twitter rant, :

Of course, the movement to remove the Confederate flag from state houses, flags, license plates, and in response, from the shelves of the nation’s retailers has happened exactly the way conservatives preach: through the elected officials of the people and through the free market. The President didn’t sign an executive order, nor did South Carolina’s governor. Nor were there advocacy groups demanding Walmart, Amazon, eBay, Sears, and Etsy remove Confederate flag products from their assortments. 

And of course, this behavior from the right is the madness that is the essence of today’s conservatives.

 

Related:

Breitbart: Liberals Bully Conservatives To Death, Because, Dan Savage

Top Politicians, Journalists, And Ben Shapiro React To Obama’s Trayvon Martin Remarks

Guess How Many People On Twitter Have Seriously Compared Obama To Hitler Since Yesterday?

 

Image by Anita Hart via Flickr and a CC license

There's a reason 10,000 people subscribe to NCRM. You can get the news before it breaks just by subscribing, plus you can learn something new every day.
Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

IT'S NOT A GAME

Trump Holds Housing Bill Hostage, Mike Johnson Says He’ll Sign It Anyway

Published

on

President Donald Trump suddenly announced he was holding hostage a housing bill that passed with overwhelming bipartisan support until the SAVE America Act is passed. But Speaker of the House Mike Johnson said Trump will sign it anyway.

Trump was set to sign the “21st Century ROAD to Housing Act,” which passed the Senate Monday 85-5 and the House Tuesday 393-13, on Wednesday afternoon. But those plans were thrown into chaos when he posted to Truth Social that he was cancelling the signing.

“Today’s Housing News Conference and Signing is hereby cancelled until such time as we pass the desperately needed SAVE AMERICA ACT, which I consider to be a National Emergency. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” Trump wrote. Shortly before on Wednesday morning, he had called for the end to the filibuster in order to pass the act.

READ MORE: ‘A Joke’: Trump’s Possible National Housing Emergency Sparks Fierce Backlash

The SAVE America Act—or Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act—would require Americans to provide proof of citizenship when registering to vote and show photo ID when voting in federal elections. Trump claims the bill is necessary to prevent widespread election fraud, despite there being no evidence of voter fraud on a large scale. Though passed in the House, with Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-TX), joining Republicans, the bill has languished in the Senate. Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) said he will not bring the bill to a vote, because he knows it will not pass.

Speaking to reporters Wednesday, Johnson dismissed Trump’s bluster, and said that he would “understand it’s a good product” when he goes through the housing bill, and will ultimately sign it.

“When interest rates are high and costs are high, it makes the barrier to entry so high that young families can’t get into houses anymore. That’s not a Republican or Democrat problem, it’s an American problem, so, Americans are fixing it. And so, we’re going to reduce regulation so builders can build. We’re going to limit institutional investing in the housing market. We’re going to bring the American dream back within the grasp of hardworking American families,” Johnson said in a clip surfaced by journalist Aaron Rupar. “The president, when we go through the details of the bill, he’s going to understand that it’s a good product and certainly something that fulfills his promises to bring down the cost,”

The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act aims to increase the housing supply and drive down home prices. One of the main ways it does so is to limit institutional investors from purchasing homes, according to CBS News. It will also help local governments convert empty buildings zoned for commercial use into housing, and removes some regulations in building new houses.

Image via Reuters

Continue Reading

News

Trump Calls to End Filibuster to Pass ‘Everything Republicans Have Ever Dreamed Of’

Published

on

President Donald Trump called for the end of the filibuster so the GOP can pass “everything” it “ever dreamed of.”

In a Wednesday morning post to his social media platform Truth Social, Trump stumped for the SAVE America Act over a housing bill drafted by Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Tim Scott (R-SC). That bill, the “21st Century ROAD to Housing Act,” passed the Senate Monday in a vote of 85-5 and heads to the House, where it is expected to pass.

READ MORE: Internet Rises Up to Slam Mitch McConnell for Claiming Filibuster ‘Has No Racial History at All’

“The Elizabeth ‘Pocahontas’ Warren centric housing bill, which is of minor importance compared to lower interest rates, and even FISA, pales in comparison to passing THE SAVE AMERICA ACT. That is what Americans, both Dumocrats, Republicans, and everyone else, care about. Get the bad Republicans to approve it or, better yet, Terminate the Filibuster and approve it, AND EVERYTHING ELSE REPUBLICANS HAVE EVER DREAMED OF. The Dumocrats will do it in hour one, 100%. Republicans will feel very stupid if they don’t do it first. I’ll be watching with tears in my eyes!!!” Trump wrote.

The SAVE America Act—or Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act—would require Americans to provide proof of citizenship when registering to vote and show photo ID when voting in federal elections. Trump claims the bill is necessary to prevent widespread election fraud, despite there being no evidence of voter fraud on a large scale. Though passed in the House, with Henry Cuellar (D-TX), joining Republicans, the bill has languished in the Senate.

The Republicans have a Senate majority, with 53 versus 45 Democrats (and two independent senators who caucus with the Dems), but the bill is unlikely to pass. An earlier attempt to pass it as an amendment to the DHS appropriations bill failed with four Republicans (Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Susan Collins of Maine and Thom Tillis of North Carolina) voting against it.

While if a vote were held, it is likely based on previous attempts that a simple majority could be reached, the bill would be filibustered. A filibuster is a way to require a bill be passed with a supermajority—60 votes, a threshold the SAVE America Act probably can’t reach. Even if all Republicans voted for it, which is itself unlikely, it would require seven Democrats to cross the aisle to vote for it.

Though Trump has repeatedly called to end the filibuster, Democrats have as well. In 2022, many donors pulled their funding from conservative-leaning Democratic Senators Joe Manchin (WV) and Kyrsten Sinema (AZ). At the time, Democrats called for the end of the filibuster to pass federal abortion rights after the fall of Roe v. Wade, but their attempts were stymied by Manchin and Sinema.

Image via Reuters

Continue Reading

News

Three of The Four Republicans Who Voted to Release The Epstein Files Won’t Be in the House in 2027

Published

on

In 2025, four House Republicans broke ranks to vote in favor of releasing the files relating to disgraced financier and sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein. Three of them will not be returning in 2027.

While running for a second term, many of President Donald Trump’s surrogates on the campaign trail said that if elected, he would release the complete files on Epstein. Even though Trump himself was more cool on the idea—he’d called the files a “Democrat hoax that never ends“—his supporters were so outspoken about it that it became a de facto plank of his platform.

Throughout 2025, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) delayed the vote as long as he could. Representatives organized a discharge petition to force the vote, and Johnson even delayed swearing in Rep. Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ) for two months, as she promised to be the final signature needed. But in November, the House finally voted. All Democrats voted to release the Epstein files, but four Republicans—just enough to get it to pass—crossed party lines to vote in favor.

READ MORE: Marjorie Taylor Greene Says She’s ‘Done Supporting’ The GOP: ‘Party Betrays Its Voters’

Those congresspeople, Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, Nancy Mace of South Carolina, Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Lauren Boebert of Colorado, had previously been staunch allies of Trump, and among the most conservative members of the House. However, after their vote, Trump and the MAGA movement turned on them.

Greene was the first to leave. She announced she’d be resigning a week after the Epstein vote, saying she didn’t want to put her family and constituents through “a hurtful and hateful primary against me by the president that we all fought for.” She resigned on January 5, the five-year anniversary of her first swearing in.

Massie was the next to fall. His primary was May 19, and he came in second to the Trump-backed Ed Gallrein, a former Navy SEAL. The election was hard-fought, with the candidates and their supporters spending the most money on advertising in a House race ever, according to NBC News. Massie lost by nearly 10 percentage points and a little more than 10,000 votes. After his loss, Trump said, “He was a bad guy. He deserves to lose.”

Though a Trump loyalist like Massie, Mace also positioned herself as the face of anti-LGBTQ activism. She railed against Rep. Sarah McBride (D-DE), the first openly trans member of Congress. Mace introduced a bill barring trans women from using the women’s restrooms, telling reporters the legislation was directed at McBride specifically. Mace ended up coming in fifth in her primary on June 9, earning just 12.1% of the vote. The top two vote-getters faced off June 23 in a primary, with the state Attorney General Alan Wilson triumphing over the Trump-backed Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette.

Massie and Mace are lame ducks—and the question remains, will Boebert join them? Boebert’s primary is June 30—and given that her district is the reddest in Colorado, it is nearly a foregone conclusion that the primary winner will ultimately land in Washington. That said, despite Trump calling for someone to run against her, he did so too late for anyone to file, and Boebert is running for her party’s nomination unopposed. So barring an unprecedented upset—she’s currently polling at 80% over her Democratic rival Eileen Laubacher—Boebert will be the last one standing.

Image via Shutterstock

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 AlterNet Media.