COMMENTARY
‘Calling BS’: NY Times Slammed for Claiming a GOP Activist, Author, and Donor Is a ‘Hillary-Biden Voter’ for Youngkin

New York Times reporter Jeremy Peters is under fire after the “paper of record” ran a story Sunday he authored on the “increasingly close race for governor” of Virginia. Polls show former Democratic Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe is neck-and-neck with businessman Glenn Youngkin (photo, speaking at a Family Research Council event), a Trump-endorsed Republican who has done a good job of hiding his far right leanings and associations.
The election is Tuesday.
“Mr. Youngkin has framed the election as an opportunity for Virginians to send a message to the nation that Democrats are out of step with the majority of Americans on a number of issues, from how racial inequality is taught in schools to coronavirus-related mandates,” Peters writes.
That’s false, or at least grossly misleading: the majority of Americans strongly support mask mandates. And USA Today in September reported “60% of American parents want their kids to learn about the ongoing effects of slavery and racism as part of their K-12 education,” a fact Peters neglected to note.
But the real issue many are angered about are these two paragraphs:
“I’m a Hillary-Biden voter,” said Glenn Miller, a lawyer from McLean, as he walked into a Youngkin rally in southern Fairfax County on Saturday night that drew more than 1,000 people. He explained his tipping point: Working from home and hearing his teenage daughter’s teacher make a comment during a virtual lesson about white men as modern-day slaveholders.
“There are a lot of people like me who are annoyed,” he said, adding that he was able to vote for Mr. Youngkin because he did not associate him as a Trump Republican. “My problem with Trump was I thought he was embarrassing. I just don’t think Youngkin is going to embarrass me or the state.”
Peters pushed that angle on Twitter, calling Miller a “Hillary-Biden voter & dad” who is voting Republican because he can “stomach” Youngkin.
In fact, as many on social media noted, Glenn Miller is more than likely not a “Hillary-Biden voter,” but, as some on social media have revealed, a “GOP activist,” donor, and author.
Award-winning journalist and author Jonathan Katz notes that the “supposed Biden-turned-Youngkin voter [Jeremy Peters] quoted wrote an article about CRT and race-based admissions for Quillette two months before the 2020 election.”
Quillette is a right wing website that, as one writer at The Nation says, “normalizes the alt-right,” and is “repackaging discredited race science.”
And as Katz’s tweet shows, others are focusing in on that false “Hillary-Biden voter & dad” angle:
The supposed Biden-turned-Youngkin voter @jwpetersNYT quoted wrote an article about CRT and race-based admissions for Quillette two months before the 2020 election: https://t.co/qTHxKZb02W https://t.co/GrHh3NBcAD
— Jonathan M. Katz (@KatzOnEarth) November 1, 2021
“I’ve said it before, but Peters is either the most gullible reporter on the NYT staff or a Republican operative,” Katz adds.
It’s hard to see someone with this many donations to Republicans being a “Hillary-Biden voter.”
Looking at Mr. Miller’s recent donation history, I’d say he’s more of a … Republican (HT @joshtpm) pic.twitter.com/JMmDQCeqRU
— Jonathan M. Katz (@KatzOnEarth) November 1, 2021
Katz also reveals that Miller has authored articles for the Fairfax, Virginia GOP.
Sensitive to the mounting criticism, Peters early Monday tweeted: “If you’re a political independent who works for a nonprofit that helps vulnerable women, voted for Biden and say you think Trump is embarrassing, Twitter will still call you a rightwing nut who dupes gullible journalists. What a place.”
But Katz adds that “Miller is a highly paid, very much for profit real estate lawyer in addition to being a right-wing anti-‘CRT’ activist,” and criticizes the piece as “amateur.”
Peters’ additional claim was also debunked.
Attorney and upcoming author Luppe B. Luppen:
Peters’ defense either mistakes Katten for a nonprofit or misleadingly portrays a charity directorship as a main gig. The point he seems to be missing is the founder of an astroturfy anti-CRT group featured on GOP platforms in the run up to 2020 with a long GOP donation history… pic.twitter.com/Hhn9CqtRRg
— southpaw (@nycsouthpaw) November 1, 2021
Luppen notes this is not the first time for Peters:
This happens again and again in the pages of the New York Times beneath the byline of Jeremy Peters. https://t.co/L0GtwQVf4t
— southpaw (@nycsouthpaw) November 1, 2021
Here’s how some others are responding:
It’s difficult to see @nytimes lack of fact-checking as unintentional…👇 It’s looking more like a disturbing pattern. https://t.co/cGtlA3kpLl
— LizzieShore😷 (@lizzieshore) November 1, 2021
So this is another astro-turfed nonsense article. Noted.
— maraleia (@maraleia) November 1, 2021
To be a proper Onion headline, it would read:
“I’m a Swing Voter” says GOP Party Official Speaking to NYT Reporter.— Giant Apes on the Moon! (@GiantMoonApes) November 1, 2021
— elected means accountable (@willb2lux) November 1, 2021
Opinion | I was a lifelong self-described conservative. Then I was interviewed by Jeremy Peters. https://t.co/JG23FJRVAt
— New York Times Pitchbot (@DougJBalloon) November 1, 2021
Jeremy Peters, the NY Times writer assigned to cover the right who has once again quoted a conservative activist like they’re just a random person, is friends with Steve Bannon. In a documentary from a couple years ago you can see them chumming it up on a cab ride.
— Oliver Willis (@owillis) November 1, 2021
Peters could have avoided this simply by giving the dude an accurate label, like “never-Trump Republican.” Instead he tried to pass the guy off as a centrist liberal, which is inaccurate and misleading. People are rightly calling bullshit on that. https://t.co/5KzGWcho6w
— Christopher Ingraham (@_cingraham) November 1, 2021
Thread on Jeremy Peters work as a disinfo clean up man for the right https://t.co/Y8zZjGTjSX
— Oliver Willis (@owillis) November 1, 2021
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
![]() |