Connect with us

Trump, Desperately Trying to Change National Conversation, Threatens to ‘Send in the Feds!’ to Chicago

Published

on

What President Trump Just Threatened Is Grossly Unconstitutional

 

Literally since he raised his right hand and swore to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” Donald Trump has been in violation of it, working toward delegitimizing it – and his presidency. Conflicts of interest and the Emoluments Clause aside, The Commander in Chief and leader of the supposed free world Tuesday night went of an ugly Twitter spree that included an attack on the journalists at CNN, a promise to “build the wall!” and a threat of imposing martial law on a great American city.

“If Chicago doesn’t fix the horrible ‘carnage’ going on,” Trump tweeted, echoing the stunning word he spoke during his inaugural address, “228 shootings in 2017 with 42 killings (up 24% from 2016), I will send in the Feds!”

Let’s repeat that last portion: “I will send in the Feds!”

Now, like most statements Trump makes, it leaves a tremendous amount of room for interpretation, but on social media immediately after the President posted his tweet, many people were using the term “martial law.”

Screen_Shot_2017-01-24_at_9.56.28_PM.jpg

Screen_Shot_2017-01-24_at_9.57.14_PM.jpg

Screen_Shot_2017-01-24_at_9.57.40_PM.jpg

Of course, the president could be suggesting that he will send the Department of Justice out to help, but since just 11 days ago now-former Attorney General Loretta Lynch held a press conference in Chicago discussing the results of her investigation into the Chicago Police Department, it’s doubtful that’s what President Trump was suggesting.

Of course, it’s likely this story might have had something to do with President Trump’s unconstitutional threat:

No, it’s seems pretty clear. President Donald Trump just threatened a major American city he would take it over militarily if they can’t somehow, miraculously, rein in their gun violence crisis.

And yes, what President Trump is threatening is grossly unconstitutional.

Will Republican leadership in Congress have anything to say?

Trump and his administration since 12 noon January 20 have been embroiled in crisis after crisis, all of his own making. 

Is this how he’s going to solve his problems?

UPDATE:

This, exactly:

 

Donald Trump foments violence and hate, is a serial liar, a racist, a misogynist, a supporter of white nationalism, a fascistic bully, an authoritarian thug, a sexual assault and adultery braggart, a hypocrite, a defrauder, and is a danger to civil rights, freedom of the press, and peace around the world.

You can respond directly to Donald Trump by sending your comments to him on Twitter: @realDonaldTrump or @POTUS.
(Why are we including this information?)

To comment on this article and other NCRM content, visit our Facebook page. To contact NCRM directly you can email us.

There's a reason 10,000 people subscribe to NCRM. You can get the news before it breaks just by subscribing, plus you can learn something new every day.
Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

‘I’m All About the Gospel’ Trump Says After Refusing to Meet With Pope Leo

Published

on

Amid an escalating feud with President Donald Trump lashing out at the first American pope, Pope Leo XIV, and the pope promoting a pro-peace, anti-war message the president opposes, Trump is refusing to meet with the Vicar of Christ.

“I don’t think it’s necessary,” Trump declared on Thursday afternoon, despite new poll numbers that show his support among Catholics slipping after his attacks on the pontiff.

Earlier on Thursday, Pope Leo had posted to social media a message some thought was meant for the president.

“Woe to those who manipulate religion and the very name of God for their own military, economic, and political gain, dragging that which is sacred into darkness and filth,” he wrote.

Asked specifically about it, Trump did not answer directly, instead telling reporters that it’s “very important that the Pope understands, very, very important…Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.”

Trump also told reporters, “I’m all about the Gospel. I’m all about it as much as anybody can be!”

READ MORE: Conservative Christian Broadcaster Slams Franklin Graham’s ‘Embarrassing’ Defense of Trump

 

Image via Reuters

Continue Reading

News

Conservative Christian Broadcaster Slams Franklin Graham’s ‘Embarrassing’ Defense of Trump

Published

on

Conservative Christian evangelist Franklin Graham is rushing to President Donald Trump’s aid, defending an image the president posted that appeared to depict him as Jesus Christ, “bathed in divine light and clad in religious robes,” as The New York Times described, and one of the president with Jesus Christ. One conservative Christian broadcaster isn’t buying Graham’s defense.

“I do not believe President Trump would knowingly depict himself as Jesus Christ—that would certainly be inappropriate,” Graham wrote on social media on Thursday. “I’m thankful the President has made it very clear that this was not at all what he thought the AI-generated image was representing—he thought it was a doctor helping someone, and when he learned of the concerns, he immediately removed the post.”

“I think this is a lot to do about nothing,” Graham continued, noting that there were no halos, crosses, or angels in the illustration. “There is so much ill-intended speculation. I think his enemies are always foaming at the mouth at any possible opportunity to make him look bad.”

He went on to defend an image Trump also posted that appeared to show him being embraced by Christ.

READ MORE: Trump Axes Catholic Charities Funding for Migrant Kids Amid Pope Feud: Report

“I like the fact that this is a picture of Jesus whispering in his ear, or at least His hand on his shoulder, guiding him,” Graham declared. “We all need that—we all need to be listening to Jesus…Remember, President Trump didn’t draw this, he didn’t create it, he reposted it on his social media because he thought it was nice—I would have to agree.”

Graham called Trump the “most pro-Christian, pro-life president in my lifetime,” and suggested the Pope should “thank the President for his efforts to protect religious liberty for Catholics and people of all faiths.”

Erick Erickson, a conservative evangelical talk radio host and political commentator once described as the “most powerful conservative in America,” blasted Graham’s remarks.

“This is embarrassing,” he wrote in response to Graham’s post.

He was not alone in his condemnation.

“So laughable it’s sad. Sycophancy comes to the Graham name. Deeply unserious,” declared Professor Matthew Boedy, who focuses on the rhetoric of religion.

Republican former U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump ally, also blasted Graham.

“Franklin Graham making excuses for Trump posting himself as Jesus is one of the worst things I’ve seen,” she wrote. “Trump posted his blasphemous picture with Satan added above him, the original picture had a soldier. If you search ‘pictures of Jesus’ most of them show Jesus in white with a red robe over his shoulders. Franklin Graham of all people, who is frequently at the WH and with Trump, should be leading Trump to be a Christian, NOT telling other Christians that Trump did nothing wrong when he committed blasphemy.”

READ MORE: Why Trump Might Want to Try to ‘Usher’ Alito Into Retirement: CNN Analysis

 

Image via Reuters 

 

 

 

Continue Reading

News

Why Trump Might Want to Try to ‘Usher’ Alito Into Retirement: CNN Analysis

Published

on

Rumors have been swirling that Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito might announce he is retiring at the end of this term, and while some wonder if the rumors are part of a “pressure campaign,” there are valid reasons why an Alito retirement — or one by Justice Clarence Thomas — would be beneficial to President Donald Trump.

According to CNN analysis, even though Alito, 76, and Thomas, 77, are staunch conservatives, they are near the average retirement age for Supreme Court justices. There are signs Democrats might take control of the Senate after the November midterm elections. Even if Republicans keep control, the GOP’s margin might shrink, making a confirmation battle difficult for any Trump nominee.

CNN notes that “even if Senate Democrats come up short in November, there could be a big difference between Trump nominating a justice with 53 Republican votes this year and trying to do so with 50 or 51 in the second half of his term.”

“But the president may have other reasons, apart from the confirmability factor, to try and usher things in this direction,” CNN notes.

For instance, a confirmation fight could be an election issue that Republicans could use to drive a “significantly less enthusiastic” GOP base to the polls.

READ MORE: Trump Axes Catholic Charities Funding for Migrant Kids Amid Pope Feud: Report

“There is some thought,” CNN notes, “that Democrats’ attempts to defeat Trump’s nomination of Brett Kavanaugh in the runup to the 2018 election helped the GOP win some vulnerable red-state Senate races in what was otherwise a tough election for the party.”

There are other reasons.

“Given Trump’s recent disenchantment with two of his appointees who ruled against him on the tariffs case — Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch — he would likely prefer to have some cushion to choose someone he might view as more loyal,” CNN notes.

But Trump’s legacy might be the more motivating factor for the almost 80-year-old president.

“Trump in his comments to Fox Business spoke about appointing someone who could serve for 40 years,” CNN reports. “If he replaced even one of Alito or Thomas with someone in their 40s, for example, the average age of the conservative justices would be less than 60. If he replaced both with justices in their 40s, that average age would drop into the mid-50s.”

With four or five appointments over two terms to the nation’s highest court, Trump could be among the few presidents in modern history to so fully shape the Supreme Court in their image.

“In theory, it’s two or three, they tell me,” Trump said of the number of possible nominations he might still be able to make.

“If you just read statistics, it could be two, could be three, could be one. I don’t know,” Trump told Fox Business, adding: “I’m prepared to do it.”

READ MORE: ‘Woe to Those Who Manipulate Religion’: Is the Pope Targeting Trump?

 

Image via Shutterstock

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.