Connect with us

Spilled Milk: Crossing The Big Black Line

Published

on

This post is the second in a series of Spilled Milk columns by Emmy Award-winning writer and producer William Lucas Walker that chronicle his journey through parenthood. Spilled Milk, which originates in The Huffington Post, appears on these pages every Saturday.

 

I’m six. My mom and I are in the front seat of her very smart 1962 Chevrolet station wagon when she turns to me and asks:

“Have you thought about what you might like to be when you grow up?”

Well, I have been thinking about it. Last night she asked my big brother Jimmy. He said astronaut. How dumb-dumb-stupid, thought six-year-old me. The costume is ugly and everybody knows there’s no bathrooms in space.

“Yes, ma’am. I’ve thought about it.”

“Really? What would you like to be? A doctor, like Daddy?”

“No, ma’am.”

“Maybe you could be a lawyer like Perry Mason on TV.”

“He’s fat and has weird eyes.”

“Then what about a cowboy? Or an astronaut, like Jimmy?

“I want to be an interior decorator.”

She lost control of the car and nearly smashed into a telephone pole. I wasn’t sure what exactly I’d said, but one thing I knew: I’d crossed a line.

It would keep happening throughout my childhood. I found it impossible to keep my little Crayola self colored inside the rigid lines of gender-role conformity. I always seemed to be wanting the wrong things, like Easy Bake Ovens and Prom Night Barbies. I learned early to pick my battles. There were four boys and no sisters in my family, so I knew Barbie was a pale pink pipe dream. But a light bulb that baked a cake? That was science, right?

Under the tree that year I found a sheriff’s costume, toy pistols and a baseball glove.

I grew up in the Bible Belt, where odds are, sooner or later, you end up getting born again. It happened for me at roughly 8:15 on a Friday night. I felt as though God had spoken to me personally, revealing that He had indeed come to earth in human form. And her name was Barbra Streisand. Watching her sing “I’m The Greatest Star” in the network premiere of Funny Girl, it was clear she was channeling the divine. Her voice seemed to seep into my every corpuscle, altering my chemical makeup. It was intense.

And so it continued as puberty bloomed. From Funny Girl to Sun-In’d hair to the Speedo shot of Mark Spitz ripped from my dad’s Sports Illustrated and stuffed inside my Boy Scout manual, I was, unbeknownst to me, a standard-issue homo-in-training.

This fact hit home with a thud a few years later when I moved to the city. New York has a benevolent way of siphoning boys like me from our far-flung hometowns and depositing us into one of the few places we might actually stand a chance. You would think I’d find comfort in that. I didn’t. I was mortified to find myself floating in a sea of me’s, and awakened quite rudely to the fact that I wasn’t the unique wonder I imagined myself to be. What I was, it turned out, was a Big Gay Cliché.

Almost. As I watched from the sidelines, one by one the other me’s emerged from their closets, dancing and jubilant. I was envious of the abandon and release they seemed to find, twirling under the great disco ball of ’70s freedom.

But something held me back. I found it difficult to make the same leap. Watching my freshly liberated brethren turn their backs on the past and eagerly morph into their new bodies and haircuts, I struggled with a stubborn dream I could not seem to let go.

I’d always liked the idea of getting married and becoming a father. My own dad — a real-life Atticus Finch, straight out of To Kill A Mockingbird — set a daily example of the best a man can be for his children, inspiring his sons to want the same for ourselves. But admitting I was gay meant saying goodbye to any such notion of family. Coming out meant crossing a line from which there was no coming back.

So I stalled for years, clinging to the ludicrous hope that out there somewhere was a woman who might change me. But by that time, Barbra Streisand was heavy into Don Johnson.

It was Fernando who brought the change.

Beautiful. Bi-polar. HIV-positive. Addicted. Addictive. His red flags should have sent me running; instead, I gathered them into a bouquet. We met in 1994 on a Los Angeles sidewalk one clear night just before Christmas. I was 38. And love, finally, bottomless and vast, swallowed me whole.

I was terrified of HIV, but adored this shy man in whose veins it swam. An artist, Fernando was always encouraging me to find my Big Work. I had no idea what he was talking about. But love has a way of enhancing vision, and his made it possible to see things ahead for me that I could not.

He had seen other things as well, horrors I could not imagine. Three years prior, he’d nursed a man he loved through an ugly illness to a hideous death. Having caught a glimpse of his own future, he spent each day remaining to him painting like a madman. Larger-than-life canvases of spectacular, dazzling women peopled his living room. Women in boats overflowing with flowers. Women lugging impossible burdens uphill. Women searching the sky for the secrets of flight. Peasants, queens, sisters, the idealized heroines of his native Mexico. They had populated his fevered brain for years, and he was determined to free them before time ran out. One by one, through his gifted hands they rushed in pastels and paint, surrogates taking their places in a world about to be done with him.

There was no way we could have known the drug cocktail that would have saved him was just beyond the horizon. I hoped we’d have five years together. We had 1995.

Suicide devastates, leaving its survivors jagged, in shards. Never again can you be as you were. In the wake of his death, slowly and over time, my life began to clarify. Unnecessaries burned away. I saw rising before me the outlines of a dream I’d long since thought impossible. I set about becoming a father.

Surprisingly, the most vocal opponent of my bringing new life into the world was the woman who’d brought me into it herself.

“Have you lost your mind? You can’t have a child. You gave up that right when you chose to become a homosexual. And you’re too old. You live alone. And what about the child? What if you have a son who turns out to be a homosexual. Or worse… a lesbian!”

I paused, trying to unravel that last one, but she wasn’t finished.

“I’m not finished: A. Child. Needs. A. Mother.”

There it was. The line. I was crossing the biggest, blackest, most sacred one of all. Motherhood.

It occurred to me in that moment that every screwed-up person I know has a mother, but I held my tongue.

Kelly was not expected, never part of the plan. I was not looking the day we met. At church of all places. When he asked me when we might go out to dinner, I told him it would have to be Monday or Tuesday. Why Monday or Tuesday, he asked, as any sane person might. “Because I have an egg donor flying to town on Wednesday, we’re making embryos on Thursday and implanting them in my surrogate’s uterus on Friday.” I held my breath so as not to choke on the cloud of dust any other man would have kicked up fleeing in the opposite direction. But other men aren’t Kelly. Who could have predicted that this amazing, smart, decent, deeply funny and very handsome man would plop into my complicated sphere at that precise moment in time, becoming the surprise love of my life and the anchor of my family?

My journey became our journey. A year-and-a-half later, after two surrogates, three egg donors, several reproductive endocrinologists, and a depleted life savings, our stunning, beloved Elizabeth was born. I was 44.

My mother came around eventually. Okay, quicker than that. The moment we told her we’d named the baby after her. She actually screamed.

“I have a namesake? You don’t MEAN it!!!”

We’ve since added a son to the mix — a dimpled tyro named James, after my dad. From that day till this, my wonderful, evolving mother and these grandchildren she once thought impossible have enjoyed a giddy love affair which shows no signs of lifting.

I found my Big Work, and 11 years later, we’re thriving. Marriage and family. My gut had been right — I was born for it.

Last year, when Elizabeth turned 10, I was recounting special moments from our life together, as I tend to do on her birthday. Suddenly, one surfaced I hadn’t thought about in years. A random, rainy afternoon when, at 2-and-a-half, after a long silence, out of the clear blue and apropos of nothing, she looked up at me, smiled and uttered two words I had no idea she’d added to her tiny vocabulary.

“Barbra. Streisand.”

A few weeks later, I wrote my only poem.

Elizabeth

We met
through the lens
of a microscope

I was much taller
you floated below
eight cells
huddled together
trying to become sixteen

No eyes yet formed
to peer back at me
Just eight cells
floating there
inscrutable

A pinpoint promise
of the life I dared to dream
daring back

Your eyes are fully formed now
They are mine
my father’s
his

They peer back now
beneath downtilt lids
familiar as the nearest mirror

Today you sing for me
beneath a torrent of impossible curls
press your face to mine
and collapse into giggles
and twirl
and twirl
and twirl
awash with possibility

A thousands days
since that morning
we first met
through the lens
of a microscope

Eight cells times billions now
you peer up at me
trying to buckle your seatbelt

“Daddy help you?”

Daddy help you.
There is no line.

* * * * *

William Lucas Walker is an Emmy Award-winning writer and producer whose television credits include Frasier, Will & Grace and Roseanne. He co-created the critically-acclaimed Showtime comedy The Chris Isaak Show. Bill and his husband Kelly are the parents of Elizabeth and James, born in 2001 and 2005. The children were gratified by the legal marriage of their parents in 2008, an event that rescued them from a life of ruinous bastardry.

Spilled Milk chronicles Bill’s misadventures in Daddyland. The first recurring humor column by a gay parent to appear in a mainstream American publication, Spilled Milk has regularly landed on the front page of The Huffington Post.

Follow William Lucas Walker on Twitter: @WmLucasWalker, @SpilledMilkWLW or Facebook: “Spilled Milk” by William Lucas Walker.       

There's a reason 10,000 people subscribe to NCRM. You can get the news before it breaks just by subscribing, plus you can learn something new every day.
Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

‘100% Exonerated’: In Wild Rant Trump Ties Bondi’s Epstein Hearing to Russia Probe

Published

on

In a Truth Social rant President Donald Trump on Thursday praised Attorney General Pam Bondi’s widely-criticized and combative performance at Wednesday’s congressional hearing on the Epstein files and declared that it totally exonerated him of any charges surrounding Russia.

“AG Pam Bondi,” the president began, “under intense fire from the Trump Deranged Radical Left Lunatics, was fantastic at yesterday’s Hearing on the never ending saga of Jeffrey Epstein, where the one thing that has been proven conclusively, much to their chagrin, was that President Donald J. Trump has been 100% exonerated of their ridiculous Russia, Russia, Russia type charges.”

It was not immediately apparent why he conflated the Epstein files with allegations of Russian interference, but he went on to declare that, instead, it is “the SLIMEBALL Democrats” who “have been proven GUILTY!”

READ MORE: ‘Politically Toxic’: Voters Say Biden Was Better Than Trump

The president also attacked “’Republican’ Loser, Sanctimonious RINO Congressman, Thomas Massie,” who has been leading the charge on the GOP side to release the Epstein files.

Trump claimed the Republican lawmaker “made a total fool of himself yesterday, fighting aimlessly against a hopeless agenda of Hate and Stupidity, as most clearly stated by his crashing Job Approval Numbers in the Great Commonwealth of Kentucky, where a Military Hero Opponent, Ed Gallrein, is crushing him in the Polls.”

Trump has vowed to “lead the charge” to primary Massie.

Despite campaigning on releasing the Epstein files, Trump claimed, “Nobody cared about Epstein when he was alive, they only cared about him when they thought he could create Political Harm to a very popular President who has brought our Country back from the brink of extinction, and very quickly, at that!”

Trump did not explain how the Epstein files might create political harm for him.

“In fact,” he concluded, “this attempt by the Democrats to take away attention from tremendous Republican SUCCESS is backfiring badly. Maybe they should focus on their quest to Open our Borders to the World’s Greatest Criminals, have Transgender for Everybody or, get Men, no matter their size or strength, to play in Women’s Sports. Thank you for your attention to this matter! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP”

READ MORE: NYC Officials to Defy Trump Admin Over Pride Flag Removal From Stonewall National Monument

 

Image via Reuters 

Continue Reading

News

Trump Working Systematically to Unravel Democracy and ‘Destroy Institutions’: Columnists

Published

on

Several New York Times opinion columnists gathered to share their thoughts on President Donald Trump, warning of what they see as his efforts to unravel America’s democratic order and institutions.

E.J. Dionne warned of what he called “regime change” inside the U.S. by President Trump.

Dionne said that “we have to face up to” Americans “overlooking” how much Trump is “actually trying to fundamentally change and destroy, really, the traditional American system.”

He cited the shootings of Minnesota’s Renee Good and Alex Pretti, as an example: “There have been police killings, and there have been mishaps, but the country has never seen an entity like ICE operate completely outside the law in this way.”

Dionne cited a plethora of other examples, including the “corrupt” pardons Trump has granted, in addition to the “extraordinary” pardons he gave to those involved in the events surrounding January 6. He also cited the Justice Department as “really being destroyed and used for investigations of political enemies,” including Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, Minnesota Democratic Governor Tim Walz, and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey. And he pointed to “tariffs, by fiat, on our allies,” and Trump’s “weirdness over Greenland.”

READ MORE: ‘Politically Toxic’: Voters Say Biden Was Better Than Trump

Further defining “regime change,” Dionne pointed to what Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought “has written about radical constitutionalism,” which Dionne called “a real desire to fundamentally alter the regime.”

Trump, Dionne added, is “throwing away all of the constituencies, the swing constituencies, who came to him in the last election.”

“I think he has become more and more aggressive at it and we need to face that this is not just some guy doing one random thing after another,” he warned. “This is somebody who is setting about — in a systematic way — to destroy institutions.”

David Brooks shared his thoughts on what he called Trump’s “four unravelings.”

“First, the unraveling of the Western alliance, the post-Cold War alliance,” he said. “Second, the unraveling that E.J. just described, our democratic order.”

“Third, the unraveling of our domestic security, the sense that we live in a relatively free — at least free of state violence, and we can no longer be sure of that,” he warned. “And then the fourth — and to me, the most important and the primary one — is the unraveling of Trump’s mind, if you want to put it that way.”

Brooks warned of “mental degradation.”

READ MORE: ‘Not Making Any Comments’: GOP Rep Stays Silent as Johnson Tries to Stop Early Exit

“If you look through history at the minds of people who are driven by a lust for power and who have tyrannical tendencies, the arc of history bends toward degradation,” he said. “There’s just not many cases where somebody was becoming more and more power hungry, more and more tyrannical, and they said, ‘Oh, I better put on the brakes here and become more moderate.’ That just doesn’t happen. You get this process of mental deterioration that’s, in part, caused by the way the lust for power makes you drunk on power and is insatiable.”

He noted that those who are “driven by the lust for power” create environments that become “more sycophantic.”

Robert Siegel asked Brooks and Dionne if they believe America will have elections in November.

“At the very least, that’s not clear,” Dionne replied, “and I think it’s something that people began to worry about even more over the last several weeks when the F.B.I. raided the Board of Elections down in Georgia, in Fulton County.”

He pointed to the presence of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and said, “I think a lot of people saw this as an attempt to affect the election. Then Trump himself spoke of nationalizing the rules of the election — he then said in 15 places, which sounded like Democratic states. The beginning of that statement he made was: Republicans should take over the elections.”

Brooks had a different opinion.

“I have every confidence that we’ll have an election,” he said, noting that he thinks that Trump has “internalized that we are a democracy and that he needs to step down in 2028.”

He pointed to historical references, then said, “I just have tremendous faith in the power of the people manning our institutions, in the military, in the election officials on the state level and Republicans on the state level. So I think we’ll hold.”

READ MORE: NYC Officials to Defy Trump Admin Over Pride Flag Removal From Stonewall National Monument

 

Image via Reuters 

Continue Reading

News

‘Politically Toxic’: Voters Say Biden Was Better Than Trump

Published

on

A year into Donald Trump’s presidency, a trio of polls from across the ideological spectrum all come to the same conclusion: voters say Joe Biden did better a better job.

President Trump has become “politically toxic,” Axios reports, finding that he has “squandered virtually every advantage that won him the presidency.”

A Harvard CAPS/Harris poll “found that 51% of registered voters say Trump is doing a worse job than Biden, compared with 49% who say he’s doing better.”

The right-leaning Rasmussen Reports found that “48% of likely voters say Biden did a better job as president, compared with 40% who chose Trump.”

READ MORE: ‘Not Making Any Comments’: GOP Rep Stays Silent as Johnson Tries to Stop Early Exit

A YouGov/Economist survey “found that 46% of U.S. adults say Trump is doing a worse job than Biden, compared with 40% who say he’s doing better.”

What were once Trump’s strengths are now his weaknesses.

“49% of adults ‘strongly disapprove’ of how Trump has handled border security and immigration, according to a new NBC News poll.”

And when it comes to younger voters, Trump has “cratered.”

“The YouGov/Economist poll found Trump at -42 net approval among 18–29 year-olds — a 51-point swing from +9 at the start of his presidency,” Axios reported.

CNN data analyst Harry Enten recently said that Trump “built his two presidential victories on winning voters without a college degree,” adding that, “Donald Trump’s base with non-college voters is absolutely collapsing.”

READ MORE: NYC Officials to Defy Trump Admin Over Pride Flag Removal From Stonewall National Monument

The political danger for Trump is spreading beyond voters.

Punchbowl News reported on Thursday that Trump’s pressure tactics on congressional Republicans aren’t working — and his polling numbers are making his threats less effective.

“When the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail,” Punchbowl reported. “Such is life with President Donald Trump, who’s warning that Republicans will be made to suffer — either in primaries or on Election Day — for voting against his unprecedented tariff regime.”

But Punchbowl observed, “if Trump’s approval ratings stay where they are, Republicans may continue to buck him, betting that opposing an unpopular president is smart for the midterms.”

READ MORE: Carville Predicts Trump Will Get a Complete and Total ‘Whipping’

 

Image via Reuters 

 

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.