The following are Mayor Michael R. Bloombergâ€™s remarks as prepared for delivery at the Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art.
â€œI want to thank Rachel and our hosts here at The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art.
â€œI think itâ€™s fair to say that no institute of higher learning has had a more profound impact on the course of American history than Cooper Union. By opening the doors of its Great Hall to Abraham Lincoln, Frederick Douglass, Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and so many other pioneering leaders, and by hosting the founding of the NAACP, Cooper Union has helped push American freedom ever higher, and ever wider.
â€œToday, we gather in this innovative and striking new academic building â€“ a symbol of how Cooper Union has always looked forward and always championed progress. We gather â€“ in the tradition of those who came before us â€“ to discuss a momentous question before our nation and our great State of New York: Should government permit men and women of the same sex to marry?
â€œIt is a question that cuts to the core of who we are as a country â€“ and as a city. It is a question that deserves to be answered here in New York â€“ which was the birthplace of the gay rights movement, more than 40 years ago. And it is a question that requires us to step back from the platitudes and partisanship of the everyday political debate and consider the principles that must lead us forward.
â€œThe principles that have guided our nation since its founding â€“ freedom, liberty, equality â€“ are the principles that have animated generations of Americans to expand opportunity to an ever wider circle of our citizenry. At our founding, African-Americans were held in bondage. Catholics in New York could not hold office. Those without property could not vote. Women could not vote or hold office. And homosexuality was, in some places, a crime punishable by death.
â€œOne by one, over many long years, the legal prohibitions to freedom and equality were overcome: Some on the battlefield, some at the State House and some in the courthouse. Throughout our history, each and every generation has expanded upon the freedoms won by their parents and grandparents. Each and every generation has removed some barrier to full participation in the American dream. Each and every generation has helped our country take another step on the road to a more perfect union for all our citizens. That is the arc of American history.Â That is the march of freedom. That is the journey that we must never stop traveling. And that is the reason we are here today.
â€œThe next great barrier standing before our generation is the prohibition on marriage for same-sex couples. The question is: Why now? And why New York? I believe both answers start at the Stonewall Inn. When the Village erupted in protest 42 years ago next month, New York â€“ and every other state in the union, save one â€“ still had laws on the books that made same-sex relationships a crime. A couple could go to prison for years, just for being intimate in the privacy of their own home. For men and women of that era, an era many of us remember well, being in a gay relationship meant living in fear:
â€œFear of police harassment.
â€œFear of public humiliation
â€œFear of workplace discrimination.
â€œFear of physical violence.
â€œToday, in some places, those fears still linger. But as a nation, we have come a long way since Stonewall. Today, two women in a committed relationship â€“ who years ago would have hidden their relationship from family and friends â€“ will instead take part in a wedding ceremony in front of their family and friends. Today, two men who are long-time partners â€“ who years ago would never even have entertained the idea â€“ will adopt a child and begin a family.
â€œBoth events are possible because thousands of courageous individuals risked everything to come out and speak out. And because they did â€“ because they organized and protested, because they poured their hearts out to friends and family and neighbors, because they stood up for their rights and marched for equality and ran for office â€“ laws banning same-sex relationships have been struck down by the Supreme Court. More than 20 states have adopted laws that prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation. And beginning this year, patriotic men and women will be able to enlist in the U.S. military without having to hide their identity.
â€œWe owe all of those pioneers a deep debt of gratitude.Â And although the work is far from over, there is no doubt that we have passed the tipping point.
â€œToday, a majority of Americans support marriage equality â€“ and young people increasingly view marriage equality in much the same way as young people in the 1960s viewed civil rights. Eventually, as happened with civil rights for African-Americans, they will be a majority of voters.Â And they will pass laws that reflect their values and elect presidents who personify them.
â€œIt is not a matter of if â€“ but when.
â€œAnd the question for every New York State lawmaker is: Do you want to be remembered as a leader on civil rights? Or an obstructionist? On matters of freedom and equality, history has not remembered obstructionists kindly.
â€œNot on abolition.
â€œNot on womenâ€™s suffrage.
â€œNot on workersâ€™ rights.
â€œNot on civil rights.
â€œAnd it will be no different on marriage rights.
â€œSo the question really is: So, why now? Because this is our time to stand up for equality. This is our time to conquer the next frontier of freedom. This is our time to be as bold and brave as the pioneers who came before us. And this is our time to lead the American journey forward.
â€œItâ€™s fitting that the gay rights movement began in our City, because New Yorkers have always been at the forefront of movements to expand American freedoms â€“ and guarantee American liberties. Long before our founding fathers wisely decided to separate church from state, leading citizens of our City petitioned their colonial rulers for religious freedom. Long before Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation, many New Yorkers â€“ including the founder of this college, Peter Cooper â€“ crusaded against slavery. Long before the nation adopted the 19th Amendment, New Yorkers helped lead the movement for womenâ€™s suffrage. And long before the Civil Rights Act of 1964, New Yorkers played a pivotal role in advancing a color-blind society.
â€œSo why should New York now lead on marriage equality? Because we have always led the charge for freedom â€“ and we have always led by example. No place in the world is more committed to freedom of expression â€“ religious, artistic, political, social, personal â€“ than New York City. And no place in the world is more welcoming of all people, no matter what their ethnicity or orientation.
â€œThat has always been what sets us apart. In our city, there is no shame in being true to yourself.Â Â There is only pride. We take you as you are â€“ and we let you be who you wish to be. That is the essence of New York City!
â€œThat is what makes us a safe haven for people of every background and orientationâ€¦ and a magnet for talented and creative people. Itâ€™s the reason why we are the economic engine for the country and the greatest city in the world.
â€œBut itâ€™s up to us to keep it that way. As other states recognize the rights of same-sex couples to marry, we cannot stand by and watch. To do so would be to betray our civic values and history â€“ and it would harm our competitive edge in the global economy. This is an issue of democratic principles â€“ but make no mistake, it carries economic consequences.
â€œWe are the freest city in the freest country in the world â€“ but freedom is not frozen in time. And if we are to remain the freest city, with the most dynamic and innovative economy, we must lead on this issue â€“ just as we have on so many other matters of fundamental civil rights.
â€œIn talking to State legislators who do not yet support marriage equality, I can sense that many of them are searching their souls for answers â€“ and they are torn. Like all of us, they have friends and family and colleagues who are gay and lesbian. They know gay and lesbian couples who are deeply in love with each other â€“ many of whom are loving and devoted parents, too. They know those couples yearn to be seen and treated as equal to all other couples. And they often hear from their own families â€“ especially their children â€“ that this is a civil rights issue. I hope they listen to their kids carefully and make them proud with their foresight and courage.
â€œNow, I understand the desire by some to seek guidance from their religious teachings. But this is not a religious issue.Â It is a civil issue. And that is why, under the bill proposed in Albany, no church or synagogue or mosque would be required to perform or sanction a same-sex wedding â€“ as is the case in every state that has legalized marriage equality.
â€œSome faith communities would perform them; others would not. That is their right. I have enormous respect for religious leaders on both sides of the issue, but government has no business taking sides in these debates â€“ none!
â€œAs private individuals, we may be part of a faith community that forbids divorce or birth control or alcohol. But as public citizens, we do not impose those prohibitions on society. We may place our personal faith in the Torah, or the New Testament, or the Koran, or anything else. But as a civil society, we place our public faith in the U.S. Constitution: the principles and protections that define it, and the values that have guided its evolution. And as elected officials, our responsibility is not to any one creed or congregation, but to all citizens.
â€œIt is my hope that members of the State Senate majority will recognize that supporting marriage equality is not only consistent with our civic principles â€“ it is consistent with conservative principles. Conservatives believe that government should not intrude into peopleâ€™s personal lives â€“ and itâ€™s just none of governmentâ€™s business who you love!
â€œConservatives also believe that government should not stand in the way of free markets and private associations â€“ including contracts between consenting parties. And thatâ€™s exactly what marriage is: a contract, a legal bond, between two adults who vow to support one another, in sickness and in health.
â€œThere is no State interest in denying one class of couples a right to that contract. Just the opposite, in fact. Marriage has always been a force for stability in families and communities â€“ because it fosters responsibility. Thatâ€™s why conservatives promote marriage â€“ and thatâ€™s why marriage equality would be healthy for society, healthy for couples and healthy for children.
â€œRight now, sadly, children of same-sex couples often ask their parents: â€˜Why havenâ€™t you gotten married like all our friendsâ€™ parents?â€™ Thatâ€™s a heartbreaking question to answer.
â€œAnd itâ€™s an early expression of the profound principle that sets our country apart: that all people are created equal, with equal rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That is the American dream â€“ but for gay and lesbian couples, it is still only that: A dream.
â€œThe plain reality is, if we are to recognize same-sex and opposite sex couples as equals, that equality must extend to obtaining civil marriage licenses. Now, some people ask: Why not just grant gay couples civil unions?
â€œThat is a fair and honest question. But the answer is simple and unavoidable: Long ago, the Supreme Court declared that â€˜separate but equalâ€™ opportunities are inherently unequal. It took the U.S. Supreme Court nearly 60 years afterÂ Plessy vs. Ferguson, which upheld disparate treatment of non-whites, to come to that conclusion.
â€œBut justice finally prevailed. It took the Supreme Court another 13 years to strike down laws barring inter-racial marriage and another 36 years after that to strike down laws criminalizing same-sex relationships. The march for equality and tolerance in America has sometimes been slow, but it has never stopped.
â€œSince our nationâ€™s earliest days, when the first Congress adopted the Bill of Rights, the Constitutionâ€™s protections of liberty have grown broader and stronger, and the law of the land has grown increasingly neutral on matters of race, nationality, gender, and sexual orientation.
â€œThat inexorable progress is the genius of our constitutional system. In fact, we have had major social change without violence because the revolution we seek is contained within our founding documents. We have no king to overthrow â€“ only our own ideals to live up to.
â€œIn the weeks ahead, I will continue doing everything I can to convince our state legislators to take the long view and consider their place in history â€“ and consider the kind of world they want to leave their children.
â€œGovernor Cuomo and Governor Paterson both deserve great credit for advancing this issue in Albany, and I strongly believe that just as New Yorkers are discussing and debating it openly â€“ so should both houses of the State Legislature.
â€œThatâ€™s democracy. And the essence of democracy is a public debate and a public vote. New Yorkers have a right to know where their elected officials stand â€“ and make no mistake about it, avoiding a vote is the same as a no vote on this historic issue â€“ and New Yorkers deserve better.
â€œWe deserve a vote not next year, or after the 2012 elections, but in this legislative session.
â€œThereâ€™s a reason Iâ€™m so passionate about this issue â€“ and so determined to push for change. I see the pain the status quo causes â€“ and I cannot defend it. When I meet a New Yorker who is gay, when I speak with friends and members of my staff who are gay, or when I look into the eyes of my niece, Rachel, I cannot tell them that their government is correct in denying them the right to marry. I cannot tell them that marriage is not for them. I cannot tell them that a civil union is good enough.
â€œIn our democracy, near equality is no equality. Government either treats everyone the same, or it doesnâ€™t. And right now, it doesnâ€™t.
â€œTonight, two New Yorkers who are in a committed relationship will come home, cook dinner, help their kids with their homework and turn in for the night. They want desperately to be married â€“ not for the piece of paper they will get. Not for the ceremony or the reception or the wedding cake. But for the recognition that the lifelong commitment they have made to each other is not less than anyone elseâ€™s and not second-class in any way. And they want it not just for themselves â€“ but for their children. They want their children to know that their family is as healthy and legitimate as all other families.
â€œThat desire for equal standing in society is extraordinarily powerful and it has led to extraordinary advances in American freedom.
â€œIt has never been defeated.
â€œIt cannot be defeated.
â€œAnd on marriage equality, it will not be defeated.
â€œThere is no retreating to a past that has disappeared. There is no holding back a wave that has crested. And there is no denying a freedom that belongs to us all.
â€œThe time has come for us to fulfill the dreams that exploded onto Sheridan Square 42 years ago: to allow thousands of men and women to become full members of the American family, and to take the next step on the inspired journey our founding fathers first began.
â€œTogether, we can work across the aisle to pass a bill allowing all New Yorkers to walk down the aisle and lead our state and country toward a more perfect union. Thank you.â€
(via Chris Geidner at MetroWeekly)
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
‘Coup Memo’ Think Tank Encouraging ‘Secession-by-Sheriff’ With Latest Project: Report
A right-wing Claremont Institute is undermining law and order and encouraging secession one county at a time.
The think tank, where coup memo author John Eastman remains a member in good standing, is weaponizing “patriotic law enforcement officers” with its new “Sheriff’s Fellowship” that ties together conservative anger over Black Lives Matter protests, COVID-19 lockdowns and Donald Trump’s election loss to bring so-called “Constitutional Sheriffs” into the mainstream, reported The Bulwark’s Charlie Sykes.
“Our nation’s conservative movement needs a countervailing network of uncorrupted law enforcement officials,” the think tank announced. [We need sheriffs] “not beholden to bureaucratic masters, and whose geographic boundaries, jurisdictional latitude, and — most important — direct connection and responsibility to citizens, places them on the frontlines of the defense of civilization.”
The plan sounds a lot like the Constitutional Sheriffs movement, which has infiltrated law enforcement agencies around the country with specious claims borrowed from the sovereign citizen movement that places the county sheriff as the “highest legitimate law enforcement” in the U.S. and claims they have authority to determine which laws are constitutional.
“Think of it as militias with badges, guns, and formal law enforcement powers,” Sykes wrote. “Or, if you like, secession-by-sheriff.”
Trump and his administration encouraged the sheriffs’ movement and openly backed leading figures such as Arizona’s Joe Arpaio and Wisconsin’s David Clarke, and former attorney general Jeff Sessions praised the “Anglo-Saxon heritage” of the office — which the Claremont Institute also did in a recent fundraising letter.
“The current revolution against the American regime, involving as it does both crime and political malfeasance, requires a coordinated response from patriotic law enforcement officers,” the letter reads. “Sheriffs are appropriate for this response. Since their beginnings as ‘shire-reeves’ (‘county watchmen’) centuries ago in England, sheriffs have been intimately connected with, and answerable to, the people of their “shires” and therefore the first layer of protection, and last line of defense, for the people’s rights.”
Another Arizona sheriff, Pinal County’s Mark Lamb, has emerged as a leading figure among militia-minded right-wing sheriffs who are loyal to Trump and supportive of the Jan. 6 insurrection.
“If Claremont gets its way, there will be sheriffs like Joe Arpaio, David Clarke, and Mark Lamb all across the country,” Sykes wrote. “You are not worried nearly enough about what that might mean.”
Josh Duggar Dealt Another Blow as Judge Refuses to Suppress Video Evidence in His Child Porn Case
Josh Duggar was dealt yet another blow on Monday, after a judge refused his attorneys’ request to suppress video evidence in his bombshell child pornography case.
Duggar, once a darling of the religious right, an executive for an anti-LGBTQ hate group, and a “19 Kids and Counting” reality TV star, was arrested by U.S. Marshals and charged with two counts of receiving and possessing child pornography. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security was involved in the investigation.
“In Mr. Duggar’s case, he has not shown that federal agents acted with reckless disregard for proper procedure,” U.S. District Judge Timothy L. Brooks said Monday in denying attorneys’ requests, as the Arkansas Democrat Gazette reports. “And he certainly has not shown that the agents acted in bad faith. Moreover, Mr. Duggar cannot show he was prejudiced by any delay; the devices remained in law enforcement’s safe keeping throughout this time period, and the probable cause warranting the initial seizure of the devices remained viable through the date of indictment.”
In 2015 news broke that Duggar had molested four of his sisters and a babysitter when he was a teenager, according to his parents.
Just three weeks ago the judge refused nearly all of Duggar’s attorneys’ requests, including dismissal of all charges.
His attorneys have tried to get photographs that include the 33-year old Arkansas native’s hands and feet suppressed, and even tried to have the case dismissed because the head of the Department of Homeland Security at the time of the investigation under then-President Donald Trump was, according to a federal judge, “unlawfully” appointed.
Trial is scheduled to begin November 30.
Glenn Youngkin Brags About Support From Opponents of LGBTQ Equality Just Weeks Ahead of Virginia Election
Republican Glenn Youngkin is continuing to rally anti-abortion and anti-LGBTQ extremists in his bid to become Virginia’s next governor. Most Virginians support legal equality, including marriage equality, and most Virginians believe abortion should be legal in all or most circumstances, but Youngkin continues to seek and tout endorsements from groups that oppose LGBTQ equality and want to make abortion illegal. Youngkin has told activists that he will go “on offense” against reproductive choice once elected, and he has refused to say whether he supports marriage equality.
In a press release dated Oct. 8, Youngkin boasted about endorsements from the Family Research Council’s political arm, the Virginia Society for Human Life PAC, and longtime anti-abortion and anti-equality activist Penny Nance, head of Concerned Women for America.
FRC supports “total abortion bans” that criminalize abortion at all stages. The organization has been designated an anti-LGBTQ hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center and has long promoted anti-Muslim bigotry. None of that kept Youngkin from agreeing to speak at FRC’s annual conference for religious-right activists earlier this month, where speakers delivered Christian nationalist and bigoted messages. Delivering his own speech, Youngkin urged the activists, “Lock arms with me!”
A Youngkin campaign press release touting the latest endorsements included a long quote from FRC’s Tony Perkins smearing the Democratic nominee as a threat to religious freedom and claiming that Youngkin “understands the values that are important to Virginians.”
Nance has devoted much of her professional life to making abortion illegal and worked tirelessly to help former President Donald Trump pack the Supreme Court and other federal courts with like-minded judges. She spearheaded a $500,000 campaign backing the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Nance is also a strident opponent of LGBTQ equality, even opposingreauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act because CWA claimed it would create “new protections for homosexuals.” When the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg officiated at a gay couple’s wedding, Nance sent an email with the subject line, “Ruth Traitor Ginsburg.”
Even though Virginians soundly rejected Trump, Nance claimed that the Trump-endorsed Youngkin will “uphold the values of Virginians.”
The Virginia Society for Human Life is an affiliate of National Right to Life, which supports abortion bans, including the recent extreme Texas law that bans abortion as early as six weeks and is now being challenged in federal courts. In September, Youngkin’s campaign touted National Right to Life’s endorsement, along with that of the anti-choice Susan B. Anthony List.
This article was originally published by Right Wing Watch and is republished here by permission.
- RIGHT WING EXTREMISM2 days ago
‘Utterly Godawful’ Fox News Reporter Blasted for Using Colin Powell’s COVID Death to Promote Vaccine Disinformation
- COMMENTARY23 hours ago
‘Pig’ Donald Trump Slammed After Attacking Colin Powell for Being Treated ‘So Beautifully’ in Death
- RELIGIOUS EXTREMISM2 days ago
Preacher Who Suggests He Is Acting Like Christ Laments Government Isn’t Executing LGBTQ People
- 'HIRED ACTOR'2 days ago
Psaki Again Destroys Doocy So Bad Some Are Asking if He Is a ‘Deep State’ Actor or a ‘Plant’ to Make Her Look Good
- 'DEMASCULATE'2 days ago
Watch: Madison Cawthorn Urges Mothers of Young Boys to ‘Raise Them to Be a Monster’
- 'REMARKABLY THIN'2 days ago
‘Flaccid Little Cry Baby’: Legal Experts Weigh in on Trump’s ‘Not Very Strong’ Lawsuit to Block Jan. 6 Committee
- News1 day ago
Trump Refuses to Answer Questions in Deposition Over Lawsuit That His Security Team Assaulted Protesters: Report
- News3 days ago
Watch: Pete Buttigieg Perfectly Slaps Aside Conservatives Criticizing His Paternity Leave