A Poll Worth Freeping
Editor’s note: This guest piece is by Scott Wooledge, and was originally posted at Pam’s House Blend. Thanks to Scott and Pam for allowing us to post it here as well!
Public Policy Polling is asking folks to weigh in on where they should poll next? The choices? Connecticut, Hawaii, Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Washington.
I’m recommending you surf over and click “Rhode Island.” Here’s why:
It’s a very easy way for our community to put good (free) data into the hands of the advocates in that state to make their case to the legislators. It’s been seven months near as I can see since we’ve had reliable polling in Rhode Island on the issue of marriage equality. In June 2009, National Organization for Marriage was up to their usual dirty tricks. They commissioned a poll that allegedly showed 43% opposed and 36% support.
Of course, this is NOM’s usual nonsense and lies. The sample pool was probably culled from a Tea Party Convention. The last poll I can find was commissioned by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research in July, 2010. A survey of 502 likely voters showed very, very different results:
“Do you favor or oppose allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry legally?”
Favor: 59%
Oppose: 31%
As the vote heats up in Rhode Island, surely NOM will be quoting their fake poll left and right. Unlike, National Organization for Marriage, however, Public Policy Polling is a well-respected pollster with creditability. If they were to release similar results at this time, it could well resonate with lawmakers who are on the fence about this issue. Fresh headlines of support can only help move that vote in our favor and marginalize the opposition.
Now, there’s no guarantee that Public Policy Polling will actually ask anything about marriage equality. But with the battle looming large in that state, they’d very remiss if they didn’t include a question.
I’ve been assured that last time they conducted such a survey, they did indeed go with the popular vote winner.
The Poll is here. It take just a moment to click on it. It ends Monday.

Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
![]() |