Super Bowl Halftime Shows Are Gay? And Straight? Slate Says Yes.
Slate says that Super Bowl halftime shows can be gay and straight, and I have a problem with that. As “gay culture” becomes more and more mainstream, yes, the LGBT community may lose a bit of our history and become another part of the great melting pot that is America — but that should be neither cause for worry nor cause for segregation — and that’s what Slate does, thanks to its partnership with (of course!) Gawker Media, and Tom Scocca, managing editor of Gawker’s Deadspin.
So, I’d like to know what you think. Frankly, I’d like to simply think of this as harmless good fun — and I’m certainly not offended. But I think finding ways to categorize people and cultures — minority, oppressed cultures, especially — can be dangerous, and leads to, of course, the “that’s so gay” comments that are so hurtful and damaging, especially to our youth.
Besides, while I confess I’m no sports fan (unless we’re talking about the “sport” of politics) there are a great many gay people who are. People like Rachel Maddow, for example. Not to mention a great many famous LGBT sports figures.
So how can you say a Super Bowl halftime show is “gay”? Or, “straight”?
Slate/Socca writes:
Like humanity itself, the Super Bowl halftime show falls on a continuum between straight and gay—and sometimes goes off the continuum entirely. Here’s a breakdown of all XLV halftime programs according to Alfred Kinsey’s scale of human sexuality, from 0 for exclusively heterosexual (Paul McCartney, 2005) to 6 for exclusively homosexual (Gloria Estefan with figure skaters, 1992).
Seriously?
Is this a sharing of our history, a sign of acceptance, or just unintentionally divisive rhetoric? For mew, this isn’t about not being able to embrace our past, it’s about looking to the future and saying, “that’s so gay” is just so wrong.
I’d like to hear your thoughts — put ’em in the comments!
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.