Connect with us

News

Angela Paxton Voted Against Being Barred From Voting in Husband’s Impeachment Trial

Published

on

Texas State Senator Angela Paxton voted against a resolution to bar spouses of people on trial for impeachment. Her husband, the suspended Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, is scheduled for an impeachment trial on September 5.

Wednesday night, the Texas Senate voted 25-3 on rules for the upcoming trial that would keep the “spouse of a party to the court of impeachment” from voting or participating in deliberations in the impeachment trial. The rules call this a conflict of interest, citing Article III, Section 22, of the state’s constitution. Prior to the vote, Angela Paxton planned to participate in her husband’s trial, saying “my constituents deserve it,” according to The Houston Chronicle.

Though she can’t participate, she still plans to be present for the trial, the Chronicle reports. However, the included rules also say that a witness can’t hear other witnesses’ testimony; it is unknown whether or not Angela Paxton will be called upon to testify in the trial. Otherwise, the rules are much the same as those for other impeachment trials, according to the Chronicle.

READ MORE: Texas AG Ken Paxton’s office “dysfunctional” with child porn and shady political dealings

To be removed, two-thirds of the Senate, or 21 senators, will have to vote to convict Ken Paxton. The 31-member Senate is comprised of 12 Democrats and 19 Republicans. The required count has not been adjusted with Paxton being unable to vote; she will instead be counted as “present.” Despite Angela Paxton being barred from voting, her husband is still supported by many senators, according to the Associated Press.

Ken Paxton was suspended from his role as Texas Attorney General on May 27, when the Republican-controlled Texas House voted to impeach. Ken Paxton faces 20 articles of impeachment, however, four of those articles are not included in the September 5 trial. The Senate may choose to take those specific articles up in a later trial. The four articles involve criminal security cases that are currently pending, according to the Austin American-Statesman.

Many of the other allegations against Ken Paxton involve using the Attorney General’s office to help campaign donor Nate Paul, a real estate investor, according to the Texas Tribune. Paul was being investigated by the FBI on suspicion of fraud. Ken Paxton is accused of hiring another lawyer outside the Attorney General’s office to investigate on behalf of Paul over claims of altered search warrants. When the state’s investigators found no evidence to support Paul’s allegations, Ken Paxton refused to close the case and hired an outside lawyer to keep the investigation going. When the FBI found out, they were able to convince the judge to quash the subpoenas issued by the outside lawyer.

READ MORE: Listen: Uvalde School Massacre Was God’s Plan Says Texas AG Ken Paxton – ‘Life Is Short’

Ken Paxton is also accused of overriding his office’s previous decision to deny Paul’s lawyers copies of affidavits that would have shown unredacted information about why the search warrants were requested by law enforcement. Though he pressured one of his deputies to release the information to Paul’s lawyers, he was unsuccessful, the Tribune reported.

In addition, he told his office to intervene in a lawsuit against Paul from the Mitte Foundation, a nonprofit that had invested in Paul’s properties. Whistleblowers said that Ken Paxton’s intervention was “for the purpose of exerting pressure on the Mitte Foundation to settle on terms favorable to Nate Paul.”

Paul is also said to have asked Paxton to intervene in a public foreclosure case during the COVID-19 pandemic. A legal opinion initially said that it was fine for the foreclosure sales to go ahead as they did not violate COVID protocols. Despite being outspoken about keeping businesses open during the pandemic, Paxton allegedly had the opinion reworked to say that the sales were not allowed, as in-person gatherings were limited to 10 people at the time, the Tribune reported.

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

Trump Wails His Judge Was Appointed by ‘Democrat Politicians’ – That’s False

Published

on

During one of several rants outside the courtroom Monday during his New York trial for alleged criminal business records falsification, election interference, and “hush money,” Donald Trump repeatedly complained falsely that the judge overseeing the case was appointed by “Democrat politicians.”

Trump is well-acquainted with New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan.

Merchan was the judge who presided over the trial of Trump’s former Chief Financial Officer, Allan Weisselberg, who was convicted. He also presided over the fraud and money-laundering trial of former Trump 2016 campaign CEO and senior White House counselor Steve Bannon.

“We have a corrupt judge, and we have a judge who’s highly-conflicted,” Trump, nearly yelling, told reporters Monday afternoon. “And he’s keeping me from campaigning. He’s an appointed, New York judge, he’s appointed.”

READ MORE: ‘He Wasn’t Thinking About Melania’: Cohen Reveals Trump’s Fears in ‘Hush Money’ Testimony

“You know who appointed him? Democrat politicians. He’s appointed.”

Trump repeated his baseless claims Merchan is “corrupt” and “conflicted,” adding, “he ought to let us go out and campaign and get rid of this scam.”

Trump is incorrect about Judge Merchan’s background: he was not appointed by “Democrat politicians.”

In 2006, Republican New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg appointed Merchan to his first judicial post, to the New York City Family Court. In 2009, Chief Administrative Judge Ann Pfau appointed Merchan as Acting Justice to the Supreme Court of New York. Pfau was appointed to her first judicial post by Republican New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani.

READ MORE: Johnson Would Contest 2024 Election Results Under the Same ‘Circumstances’

Trump also appeared to suggest appointed judges are somehow suspect – despite frequently bragging that he himself appointed three justices to the U.S. Supreme Court, not to mention 234 judges in total he appointed to the federal bench.

Some legal experts believe a system where judges are appointed rather than elected serves justice better.

“The quality of justice suffers when politics invades the judicial sphere, casting doubt on the impartiality of case outcomes and eroding public confidence in our nation’s system of justice,” an article at the American Bar Association reads.

Watch Trump below or at this link.

Continue Reading

News

‘He Wasn’t Thinking About Melania’: Cohen Reveals Trump’s Fears in ‘Hush Money’ Testimony

Published

on

Former Trump “fixer” Michael Cohen in damning testimony Monday told jurors about Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s fears in 2016 when the “Access Hollywood” tape dropped, and what his real concerns were about the bombshell audio that nearly ended his nascent political career.

Cohen revealed that in 2015 when the then-real estate magnate announced he was running for president, Trump told him, “Be prepared. There’s going to be a lot of women coming forward,” according to Courthouse News.

Cohen told jurors that in 2016 “he caught wind of the fact that adult film star Stormy Daniels was shopping her story that she had sex with Trump a decade prior. Cohen said that he was concerned about the impact it could have on Trump’s presidential campaign, particularly after the release of the infamous Access Hollywood tape.”

“At this time, Mr. Trump was polling very, very low with women,” Cohen testified, adding that Trump “said to me, ‘This is a disaster.’”

READ MORE: ‘Grave Danger’: Trump’s ‘Raw Display’ of Power at Court Alarms Conservative

“‘Women will hate me. Guys, they may think it’s cool. But this is going to be a disaster for the campaign.’”

Cohen also revealed from the witness stand that he had asked Trump how his wife, Melania Trump, was taking the news about Stormy Daniels, the adult film star who Trump allegedly paid hush money to then falsified his business records to hide the transactions in an effort to influence the election, according to prosecutors.

“How long do you think I’ll be on the market for? Not long,” Trump told Cohen, according to his former attorney.

“He wasn’t thinking about Melania,” Cohen said. “This was all about the campaign.”

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins called that a “Remarkable moment.”

The Daily Mail adds, “Asked if Trump was angry during this frantic period of damage control that could surface the Stormy Daniels story, Cohen said ‘Yes. Because there was a negative story that could impact the campaign as a result of women.’ ”

Watch MSNBC’s report below or at this link.

READ MORE: Johnson Would Contest 2024 Election Results Under the Same ‘Circumstances’

Continue Reading

News

‘On Day One’: Trump Vows to End Protections for LGBTQ Students

Published

on

Donald Trump says the day he enters the Oval Office for a second term he will end anti-discrimination protections for LGBTQ+ students implemented by the Biden administration.

Serving up a scattershot series of complaints with the hosts from the Philadelphia-based right-wing talk radio show “Kayal and Company” on Friday, Trump compared LGBTQ+ protections to a “cuckoo’s nest.”

“A lot of things don’t make sense, having to do with what they’re doing, from the border to all of the men playing in women’s sports. I mean, the world is like a cuckoo’s nest right now with what they do,” Trump declared.

One of the hosts alleged President Joe Biden has engaged in “manipulation” of Title IX, the federal civil rights law that prohibits sex-based discrimination in schools that receive federal funding. She claimed parents now have to “pinch some pennies” to be able to afford private Christian schools for their children, to remove them from the enhancements that go into effect this summer.

“Many schools are grappling with what they’re going to do,” she said, “because as of August 1, as you know, because of Biden’s manipulation of Title IX, these kids, the school boards, have no choice, they’re meeting right now they, many of them perplexed, and they don’t know what to do, Mr. President, because they’re so upset over this that at August 1 a biological boy can change in a locker room.”

READ MORE: ‘Rejection of Trump’: 1 in 5 Indiana GOP Voters Just Cast Their Ballot for Nikki Haley

Trump replied, “It’s crazy. Crazy.”

“We’re going to end it on day one,” Trump vowed. “We’re going to change it on day one. It’s going to be changed. We’re going to end it. That’s right.”

“The whole thing is crazy. Look, it’s like men playing in women’s sports. It’s like open borders for the world to come in. Send all their prisoners. We’ll take as many as you can give us. Send all their people from mental institutions.”

“We’ll get that changed. Tell your people not to worry about it. It’ll be signed on day one. It will be terminated,” Trump promised, vowing to end the LGBTQ+ protections which include protections for sexual orientation and gender identity.

On his first day in office, President Biden implemented “the most far-reaching of any federal protections yet” for LGBTQ+ people, according to NPR.

In an explainer on the new expanded rules, Ms. Magazine reports “The 2024 regulations prohibit discrimination not only on the basis of sex, but also on the basis of sex characteristics, pregnancy or related conditions, sexual orientation, and gender identity.”

According to GLAAD, which is tracking “the Biden administration’s executive orders, legislative support, speeches and nominations that affect LGBTQ people and rights,” President Biden has made 337 “moves” in 1206 days.

Listen to a short clip below or at this link.

READ MORE: Bannon Will Be ‘Going to Prison’ After Criminal Contempt Conviction Upheld, Experts Predict

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.