Connect with us

News

‘Lose-Lose’: Legal Expert Explains Why DOJ Must Move to Have Judge Cannon Recuse From Trump Classified Docs Trial

Published

on

A noted legal expert is warning the U.S. Dept. of Justice on why it should be seeking U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to recuse from overseeing the Special Counsel’s classified documents case charging Donald Trump with 37 criminal felonies, largely under the Espionage Act.

Professor of law Joyce Vance, a popular MSNBC/NBC News contributor and former U.S. Attorney on Thursday wrote on Twitter, “I’m confused by the argument that the gov’t shouldn’t move for Judge Cannon’s recusal because she might be affronted.”

Pointing to her “history in the prior litigation, I’m sure she already is. It’s hard to imagine a worse situation with a trial judge.”

That history involves Judge Cannon being widely condemned publicly for her rulings in favor of Trump, rulings so out of whack judges above her on the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals issued opinions correcting her decisions that could be characterized as damning.

“Prosecutors have 2 moves here: file a motion to recuse now. If she denies it, she’s required to write a statement saying why,” Vance says, offering DOJ a gameplay. “That could be helpful. They can also wait until she enters an appealable order & ask the 11th Cir. to reassign the case on remand.”

READ MORE: ‘Lying Through Their Teeth’: White House Slams Fox News Over ‘Grooming and Pedophilia’ LGBTQ Pride Flag Article

In other words, Vance is suggesting DOJ lay the groundwork so the moment Cannon goes out of bounds, they can say, “We warned you this would happen.”

“The issue is whether the public can have confidence in this judge’s conduct of such an important trial. The answer is no based on how she handled the prior case,” Vance notes.

She adds, if Cannon “rules against Trump, he’ll claim she’s trying to fix her reputation. It’s a lose-lose if she stays on.”

“If Cannon recuses, this case could go to another Trump appointee. That’s not what this is about. It’s about whether, as the 11th Circuit said, even in the absence of bias ‘the original judge would have difficulty putting his previous views and findings aside.'”

Cannon made her choice when she overstepped her authority, when she installed a special master at Trump’s request when none was legally warranted, delaying DOJ’s investigation and ultimate prosecution.

Vance is far from the only legal expert saying Cannon should recuse.

Former U.S. Dept. of Justice Inspector General Michael Bromwich oversaw investigations into historic cases including the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, and the FBI conduct in its investigation into Aldrich Ames, the infamous former CIA counterintelligence officer convicted on espionage charges.

Pointing to a report noting Judge Cannon has “remarkably little experience overseeing criminal trials,” Bromwich says: “That is reason enough for the chief judge to step in and reassign the case if Cannon declines to recuse. This is a case whose handling will reflect–well or poorly–on the entire district court and all its 18 judges.”

There's a reason 10,000 people subscribe to NCRM. You can get the news before it breaks just by subscribing, plus you can learn something new every day.
Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

‘Reeks of a Coverup’: DOJ Official Accused of Blocking ‘Mysterious’ Epstein Probe Document

Published

on

The top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee is accusing a prominent Department of Justice official, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, of blocking access to the details of what he is calling a “mysterious Epstein investigation.”

U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) called the move “stunning interference,” and said that the document “literally says ‘unclassified’ at the top.”

“Given Blanche’s close personal ties to Donald Trump,” Wyden added, “this reeks of a continued coverup to protect key names in the Trump administration.”

Wyden also said that Blanche, whom he noted was Trump’s personal attorney, and “was also responsible for Ghislaine Maxwell’s transfer to a cushy club fed … has intervened to block the DEA [Drug Enforcement Administration] from providing details of a mysterious Epstein investigation to my Finance Committee team.”

READ MORE: ‘Is Tulsi Next?’ Questions Swirl About Future of National Intelligence Director

Wyden wrote: “Recent reporting revealed that Epstein was one of several targets of a big drug trafficking investigation a decade ago. DEA has key info. Based on what we know, Epstein was likely pumping his victims, young women and girls, with incapacitating drugs to facilitate abuse.”

The Democratic lawmaker pointed to a Bloomberg News article that said, “A Department of Justice document combined with interviews reveal that a long-running investigation into organized crime led law enforcement to suspect the serial sex abuser of money laundering, distributing ‘club drugs’ and operating a prostitution ring.”

He said that his team “immediately sought key documents from that investigation.”

“What was the result, and why did the investigation end?” he asked. “We were notified that the DEA intended to release those documents to the Finance Committee. Then Deputy AG Todd Blanche intervened.”

A separate Bloomberg Government report stated that “Blanche is blocking the Drug Enforcement Administration from releasing an unredacted document from the Jeffrey Epstein files about an investigation involving drug trafficking and money laundering, according to a letter Democratic Senator Ron Wyden sent to Blanche on Tuesday.”

READ MORE: ‘He Was Aware’: Former Top Adviser Refutes Trump’s Denials on Iran Risks

 

Image via Reuters 

 

 

Continue Reading

News

‘He Was Aware’: Former Top Adviser Refutes Trump’s Denials on Iran Risks

Published

on

A prominent former senior adviser to President Donald Trump is disputing his claim that “nobody” knew Iran would target neighboring nations or close the Strait of Hormuz if the U.S. attacked, saying that he personally warned him of those possibilities.

John Bolton, Trump’s national security adviser during his first term, “said that on multiple occasions he brought up scenarios in which Iran was attacked and responded with retaliatory strikes in the Strait of Hormuz and elsewhere,” The Hill reported.

“Well, I know for a fact that he was aware of those potentials. I raised the option of regime change in Iran several times during the time I was national security adviser,” Bolton told CNN.

“If you’re going to embark” on attacking Iran, Bolton added, “you better have answers” to how Iran would respond, “and certainly closing the Strait of Hormuz was always one of them and so were attacks on the Gulf Arab states, particularly their oil infrastructure, so he knew about it in his first term.”

“I find it hard to believe that he forgot about it in the intervening years,” the former Trump NSA said.

“Nobody, nobody, no, no, no,” President Trump said when asked if anyone had told him how Iran would retaliate. “No, the greatest experts, nobody thought they were going to hit – they were – I wouldn’t say friendly countries, they were like neutral. They lived with them for years.”

Trump also said this week that Iran wasn’t “supposed to go after all these other countries in the Middle East. Those missiles were set to go after them. So they hit Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait. Nobody expected that. We were shocked.”

READ MORE: ‘Is Tulsi Next?’ Questions Swirl About Future of National Intelligence Director

 

Image via Reuters 

Continue Reading

News

‘Grave Concern’: Democrats Demand DHS Preserve All Corey Lewandowski Records

Published

on

Three top House Democrats have requested the Department of Homeland Security preserve all records concerning longtime Trump ally Corey Lewandowski, a DHS special adviser to outgoing Secretary Kristi Noem. The Democrats have also separately requested that the Inspector General open a review into Lewandowski.

Investigative reporter Scott MacFarlane reported in an exclusive that the three top Democrats on the House Homeland Security, Oversight, and Transportation and Infrastructure Committees alleged Lewandowski, a Special Government Employee, served as a “shadow chief-of-staff” to Noem. They also “alleged Lewandowski might have violated rules and restrictions of designated Special Government Employees.”

“We write with grave concern regarding reports alleging serious misconduct at the highest levels of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS),” reads the letter from the three ranking members to Secretary Noem’s office.

“At the center of these allegations sits Mr. Corey Lewandowski, who continues to use his access to DHS leadership to wield outsized and undue influence over the Department,” they charge. “We demand DHS preserve all communications and internal records concerning Mr. Lewandowski’s role within the Department, as well as the Department’s practices, policies, and procedures related to contracting, personnel, and the handling of classified materials.”

READ MORE: ‘Is Tulsi Next?’ Questions Swirl About Future of National Intelligence Director

“Any deviation from standard record-keeping will be treated as an attempt to hide or destroy evidence,” they warned.

They also “alleged Lewandowski might have violated rules and restrictions of designated Special Government Employees,” MacFarlane reported.

The letter requests a broad range of records, including communications between Lewandowski and DHS personnel, contractors, and advisers regarding personnel, contracting, and other department operations, as well as “all communications between Mr. Lewandowski and personnel associated with the United States DOGE Service.”

Lawmakers are also seeking documents on Lewandowski’s finances, recusals due to potential conflicts of interest, and involvement in DHS decision-making.

READ MORE: White House Scrambles for Damage Control After National Security Official’s Abrupt Exit

 

Image via Reuters 

 

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.