Where Do We Go From Here?
2010: The Year When Everything Could Change – For The Worse
I’m often reminded of the late-90’s science fiction TV show, “Sliders,” in which a group of friends each week traveled, as the introduction stated, to “different worlds, different dimensions,” hoping they had returned home. “It’s the same year, and you’re the same person,” but some major fact was different. In one episode, for example, by paying for a cab ride with dollars, learned that Russia ruled America.
Next year may feel like an episode out of “Sliders.” Why? Because, despite the dramatic, Democratic landslide victory of 2008, almost everything is up for grabs in 2010. 38 of 50 states have elections for Governor. And, as all of us who followed this spring’s gay marriage dramas, yes, the state legislatures have to vote on gay marriage bills, but it’s the Governor who signs – or vetoes – those bills.
Most of those Governors’ Mansions will be home to someone else come 2011, as half of their current occupants are either facing term limits or have decided to not run for re-election. Right now, out of 50 Governors, 28 are Democrats, 22 Republican. This year, Virginia and New Jersey have Governors’ races, and it looks like both states will switch and elect Republicans. Assuming that’s true, we will have 26 Democrats and 24 Republicans. An almost even split.
Ten Democratic Governors and eight Republican Governors will be seeking (re)election (some, like New York’s David Patterson, should he choose to run, were not elected to the office they now hold.)
Of course, Governors don’t vote as a block, they don’t really vote on anything, so it’s not like we need a majority to get something done. And Republican Governors don’t automatically veto marriage equality legislation – Connecticut’s Republican Governor Jodi Rell is a great example of a smart Republican putting equality ahead of party ideology. But by and large, a Republican Governor will often mean a veto for a same-sex marriage bill. And we cannot allow that to happen.
Of course, these election are almost fifteen months away, and, as John McCain knows, any election can turn on a dime – or on stating how sound our dimes are. But there are lots of folks who make their money on predicting what the future will look like. Let’s do some divinging from their predictions and look and what the landscape could look like the morning of November 3 – when all the results are (hopefully!) in.
On the Republican side, which according to some is a bit weak, there are eight states that could flip to the Democrats. On the Democratic side, there are five that could flip. Assuming the two 2009 races go to the Republicans, and we then have a 26-24 split, that would give us a 29-21 split. But, as Governors terms of office vary sate by state, the details are more important.
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
 |
Rumors continue to swirl about Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard‘s future as critics on Wednesday slammed her testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, especially when she declared that it is not the Intelligence Community’s “responsibility” to determine what constitutes an imminent national security threat — a claim that received tremendous blowback.
“Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime?” asked U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff (D-GA).
“The Intelligence Community assessed that Iran maintained the intention to rebuild and to continue to grow their nuclear enrichment capability,” Gabbard replied.
“Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was a, quote, imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime, yes or no?” Ossoff pressed.
“Senator, the only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president,” Gabbard responded.
READ MORE: ‘Reeks of a Coverup’: DOJ Official Accused of Blocking ‘Mysterious’ Epstein Probe Document
“False,” Ossoff replied. “This is the worldwide threats hearing where you present to Congress national intelligence, timely, objective, and independent of political considerations.”
Podcaster Paul Rieckhoff, an Iraq War veteran and founder of a veterans nonprofit, slammed Gabbard’s remarks.
“I don’t think she survives this,” Rieckhoff wrote. “She’s already not trusted in Trump world as a former Democrat. And not trusted by most people period. Sooner or later, Trump is gonna dump her and blame her.”
“But like Noem, Hegseth, and so many others, she shouldn’t have been there in [the] first place,” he added. “And anyone who voted for her is responsible for this mess now. It’s all coming to the fore now. They are all being revealed. That’s what war does. Especially forever war that is now overflowing beyond US control. Our enemies are celebrating yet again. And we are all less safe. More and more by the minute.”
The Steady State, a group of 400 former national security officials, denounced Gabbard’s claim that “the only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president.”
READ MORE: ‘He Was Aware’: Former Top Adviser Refutes Trump’s Denials on Iran Risks
The group called her remark “flatly incompatible with her statutory obligation to provide ‘timely, objective, and independent of political considerations’ national intelligence assessments of threats to Congress.”
Mark Seddon, a former speechwriter for UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, called Gabbard’s testimony “devastating.”
“The fact that DNI Tulsi Gabbard does not believe it is the intelligence community’s responsibility to determine if a threat is imminent is disqualifying for her to be the National Intelligence Director,” wrote retired U.S. Navy Intelligence Officer Travis Akers. “That is one, among many, of the primary responsibilities of the IC.”
Ossoff: Was it the assessment of the intelligence community that there was an imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime?
Gabbard: The only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president. It is not the intelligence community’s… pic.twitter.com/agcse87TZI
— Acyn (@Acyn) March 18, 2026
READ MORE: ‘Grave Concern’: Democrats Demand DHS Preserve All Corey Lewandowski Records
Image via Reuters
The top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee is accusing a prominent Department of Justice official, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, of blocking access to the details of what he is calling a “mysterious Epstein investigation.”
U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) called the move “stunning interference,” and said that the document “literally says ‘unclassified’ at the top.”
“Given Blanche’s close personal ties to Donald Trump,” Wyden added, “this reeks of a continued coverup to protect key names in the Trump administration.”
Wyden also said that Blanche, whom he noted was Trump’s personal attorney, and “was also responsible for Ghislaine Maxwell’s transfer to a cushy club fed … has intervened to block the DEA [Drug Enforcement Administration] from providing details of a mysterious Epstein investigation to my Finance Committee team.”
READ MORE: ‘Is Tulsi Next?’ Questions Swirl About Future of National Intelligence Director
Wyden wrote: “Recent reporting revealed that Epstein was one of several targets of a big drug trafficking investigation a decade ago. DEA has key info. Based on what we know, Epstein was likely pumping his victims, young women and girls, with incapacitating drugs to facilitate abuse.”
The Democratic lawmaker pointed to a Bloomberg News article that said, “A Department of Justice document combined with interviews reveal that a long-running investigation into organized crime led law enforcement to suspect the serial sex abuser of money laundering, distributing ‘club drugs’ and operating a prostitution ring.”
He said that his team “immediately sought key documents from that investigation.”
“What was the result, and why did the investigation end?” he asked. “We were notified that the DEA intended to release those documents to the Finance Committee. Then Deputy AG Todd Blanche intervened.”
A separate Bloomberg Government report stated that “Blanche is blocking the Drug Enforcement Administration from releasing an unredacted document from the Jeffrey Epstein files about an investigation involving drug trafficking and money laundering, according to a letter Democratic Senator Ron Wyden sent to Blanche on Tuesday.”
READ MORE: ‘He Was Aware’: Former Top Adviser Refutes Trump’s Denials on Iran Risks
Image via Reuters
A prominent former senior adviser to President Donald Trump is disputing his claim that “nobody” knew Iran would target neighboring nations or close the Strait of Hormuz if the U.S. attacked, saying that he personally warned him of those possibilities.
John Bolton, Trump’s national security adviser during his first term, “said that on multiple occasions he brought up scenarios in which Iran was attacked and responded with retaliatory strikes in the Strait of Hormuz and elsewhere,” The Hill reported.
“Well, I know for a fact that he was aware of those potentials. I raised the option of regime change in Iran several times during the time I was national security adviser,” Bolton told CNN.
“If you’re going to embark” on attacking Iran, Bolton added, “you better have answers” to how Iran would respond, “and certainly closing the Strait of Hormuz was always one of them and so were attacks on the Gulf Arab states, particularly their oil infrastructure, so he knew about it in his first term.”
“I find it hard to believe that he forgot about it in the intervening years,” the former Trump NSA said.
“Nobody, nobody, no, no, no,” President Trump said when asked if anyone had told him how Iran would retaliate. “No, the greatest experts, nobody thought they were going to hit – they were – I wouldn’t say friendly countries, they were like neutral. They lived with them for years.”
Trump also said this week that Iran wasn’t “supposed to go after all these other countries in the Middle East. Those missiles were set to go after them. So they hit Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait. Nobody expected that. We were shocked.”
READ MORE: ‘Is Tulsi Next?’ Questions Swirl About Future of National Intelligence Director
Image via Reuters
‘Grave Concern’: Democrats Demand DHS Preserve All Corey Lewandowski Records
‘He Was Aware’: Former Top Adviser Refutes Trump’s Denials on Iran Risks
‘I Don’t Think She Survives This’: Gabbard Faces Blowback After ‘Devastating’ Testimony
‘Reeks of a Coverup’: DOJ Official Accused of Blocking ‘Mysterious’ Epstein Probe Document
‘I Don’t Think She Survives This’: Gabbard Faces Blowback After ‘Devastating’ Testimony
‘Reeks of a Coverup’: DOJ Official Accused of Blocking ‘Mysterious’ Epstein Probe Document
‘He Was Aware’: Former Top Adviser Refutes Trump’s Denials on Iran Risks
‘Grave Concern’: Democrats Demand DHS Preserve All Corey Lewandowski Records
‘Is Tulsi Next?’ Questions Swirl About Future of National Intelligence Director
News1 day ago‘Is Tulsi Next?’ Questions Swirl About Future of National Intelligence Director
News3 days agoKristi Noem at Center of Push for DOJ Perjury Probe: Report
News2 days ago‘He Was the Only One’: Trump Mocked for Declaring Iran’s Moves ‘Shocked’ Him
News2 days agoGas Prices Near $4 in These Five States
News1 day agoWhite House Scrambles for Damage Control After National Security Official’s Abrupt Exit
News2 days ago‘Sick, Demented, or Deranged’: Trump Issues Harshest Threat Yet Over Voter ID Bill
News2 days ago‘Lazy and Unstrategic’: GOP Senator Slams ‘Republican on Republican Violence’
News3 days ago‘I Don’t Wanna Say That’: Trump Dodges on Boots on the Ground
