News
Judge Cannon Rejects DOJ Request to Shield Identity of Dozens of Government Witnesses in Trump Classified Docs Case
U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has rejected a request from the Dept. of Justice’s Special Counsel Jack Smith to shield the identity of dozens of potential witnesses in the government’s classified documents case against Donald Trump.
The Guardian’s Hugo Lowell reports Judge Cannon denied the “request to file 84 potential witnesses in the Trump classified docs case under seal — says the government does not explain why it is necessary and notes media coalition has moved to have it public.”
Lawfare Blog’s Anna Bower describes the dozens of witnesses as “84 potential witnesses that Trump and Nauta are not allowed to communicate with about the case.” Nauta is Walt Nauta, Trump’s bodyman and co-defendant.
She says “the government could try again. Judge Cannon says that the Special Counsel’s motion didn’t provide sufficient information as to why it would be necessary to file the witness list under seal.”
But Bower also calls the order “quite weird considering that the motion to file the witness list under seal was unopposed by Trump and Nauta’s counsel.”
Critics of Cannon’s order warn the indicted ex-president may try to attack or smear the witnesses, while supporters of her decision to say the public’s need to know outweighs those concerns.
But MSNBC legal analyst Lisa Rubin notes Trump’s legal team “has the list already; the only question now is whether the rest of us can or will and on what timeline. After all, she questions whether it need be filed with the court period.”
Trump is facing 34 felony counts, most related to his removal of classified documents from the White House, their unlawful retention and his refusal to return them.
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.