News
Half as Many Republicans Call Jan. 6 an ‘Insurrection’ Compared to 2021
The number of Republicans willing to call the January 6 insurrection what it is has gone down significantly since 2021, according to a new Monmouth University poll.
The poll asked three questions about the January 6 insurrection: “Is it appropriate or not appropriate to describe this incident as a legitimate protest?”; “Is it appropriate or not appropriate to describe this incident as a riot?” and “Is it appropriate or not appropriate to describe this incident as an insurrection?” While in all cases, responses from voters registered as Democrats and independent voters stayed consistent over the past two years, the university said, Republican voters have changed their minds since June 2021.
When asked if it was a “legitimate protest,” 13% of Democrats and 41% of independents agreed, compared to 51% of Republicans. This figure is similar to the July 2021 poll, with 47% of Republicans agreeing at that time. However, the other two questions see a drastic drop. Calling January 6 a “riot” was fine with 82% of Democrats and 69% of independents, but only 44% of Republicans—down from 62% in June 2021.
READ MORE: Jan. 6 Grand Jury Witnesses Are Being Asked What ‘National Security Levers’ Trump Was Trying to Pull
But when asked about the word “insurrection,” 80% of Democrats agreed that was the appropriate term, as did 43% of independents. But when it came to Republicans, only 15% agreed. In June 2021, 33% would call the events of January 6 an insurrection.
The pollsters also asked about what rights people fear are under attack. The answers along party lines are in line with what one might expect. Republicans worried most about free speech and the right to bear arms—at 38% each, while Democrats mostly feared the erosion of women’s rights at 36%. Freedom of speech was a distant second, which only 14% of Democrats said was under threat.
“One of the interesting things in the survey responses is that Republicans are more likely to use the phrases ‘freedom of speech’ or ‘right to bear arms’ or simply give amendment numbers when describing threats to their fundamental rights. Democrats’ First Amendment worries are more likely to reference specific restrictions such as book banning.” Patrick Murray, director of the independent Monmouth University Polling Institute, said.
“It is also worth noting that a small but measurable number [6%] of Republicans are concerned about Fourth Amendment infringements. It certainly isn’t good for democracy if there really is widespread abuse of government search and seizure powers. It can be just as destabilizing, though, if people believe this is happening even when it is not. This is how we get events like January 6,” Murray added.
When it came to independent voters, the top two rights they think are under attack are the same as Republicans’, but to a lesser degree. Free speech was under attack according to 27% of independents, and 22% said the same for the Second Amendment. However, 13% of independents said that the right to reproductive choice and abortion was under attack, compared to 29% of Democrats and only 1% of Republicans.
The poll has a sample size of 981 adults and a margin of error of 5.6%.
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
 |
President Donald Trump is drawing mockery after telling a CBS News reporter that his war in Iran is “very complete, pretty much,” as the administration’s military priorities continue to shift rapidly.
In the early hours of the war, Trump had strongly suggested it was about regime change, only to have his defense secretary days later specifically state it was not.
On Monday, apparently around the time he had a telephone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump said Iran has “no navy, no communications, they’ve got no Air Force.”
Secretary of State Marco Rubio made similar remarks earlier on Monday.
“The goals of this mission are clear, and it’s important to continue to remind the American people of why it is that the greatest military in history of the world has engaged in this operation,” he told reporters. “It is to destroy the ability of this regime to launch missiles, both by destroying their missiles and their launchers. Destroy the factories that make these missiles, and destroy their Navy.”
Days earlier, Trump had called for Iran’s “unconditional surrender.”
Professor of Strategic Studies Phillips P. O’Brien responded to Rubio’s remarks, saying: “If this is actually the new set of strategic goals, the Trump administration is admitting that they have strategically failed and this has been a disaster.”
Specifically referencing Trump’s remarks to CBS News, Professor O’Brien added, “So is this Trump looking to throw in the towel?”
Foreign policy analyst Jimmy Rushton observed, “No mention of removing the regime. No mention of destroying the Iranian nuclear programme. No mention of destroying Iran’s ability to project power via proxy forces. The administration’s war aims are constantly changing.”
Similarly, political scientist Ian Bremmer noted, “declaring victory and ending war with iran much easier with these goals. not mentioned: -regime change -uranium enrichment/stockpiling -attack drones.”
SECRETARY RUBIO: The goals of the mission against the Iranian regime are clear:
– Destroy their ability to launch missiles
– Destroy factories making these missiles
– Destroy their navy pic.twitter.com/KPUpMGNtDf— Department of State (@StateDept) March 9, 2026
Image via Reuters
President Donald Trump told CBS News on Monday that his war in Iran could be almost over — just after the Pentagon tweeted, “We have Only Just Begun to Fight.”
“In a phone interview, President Trump told me the war could be over soon,” reported CBS’s Weijia Jiang on Monday afternoon, less than one hour after the social media post. “I think the war is very complete, pretty much. They have no navy, no communications, they’ve got no Air Force.”
Trump added that the U.S. is “very far” ahead of his initial 4-5 week estimated time frame,” Jiang added.
The Commander-in-Chief’s prediction also came just days after Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth told CBS News’ “60 Minutes” that this is “just the beginning” of the war in Iran, as The Washington Post’s John Hudson reported.
Earlier on Monday, the Pentagon posted another Iran tweet: “This is just the beginning—we will not be deterred until the mission is over.”
READ MORE: ‘Blatant Racism’: House Republican’s Remarks Spark Backlash
One week ago, after President Trump specifically alluded to the war in Iran being about regime change, Secretary Hegseth declared it was not.
“Trump repeatedly emphasized regime change was a goal — and possibly even the goal,” CNN reported.
“America is backing you with overwhelming strength and devastating force,” Trump said to the Iranian opposition in the early hours of the war. “Now is the time to seize control of your destiny and to unleash the prosperous and glorious future that is close within your reach. This is the moment for action. Do not let it pass.”
“When we are finished, take over your government,” Trump added. “It will be yours to take.”
Barely days later, Hegseth told reporters, “This is not a so-called regime change war.”
READ MORE: ‘Good Luck in the Midterms’: Anti-Trump Conservatives Smell Weakness in the President
Image via Reuters
Some Washington Post readers are mocking the paper and its op-ed that suggests a link between Starbucks’ lattes, and loneliness and the destruction of society.
The op-ed’s author, professor of politics Jakub Grygiel, writes that the “atomization of society begins with your morning coffee.”
He immediately points out that 46 percent of Americans have had a specialty coffee drink in the past day, and “54 percent of U.S. adults feel isolated and half of them feel bereft of companionship ‘often or some of the time,’ according to the American Psychological Association.”
Grygiel then says that ordering a latte your way is wasting everyone else’s time, which, he surmises, makes you feel lonely.
“As specialty coffee consumption has surged (84 percent since 2011), so has the loneliness epidemic. Just a correlation? Consider what your coffee order reveals,” he suggests.
READ MORE: ‘Blatant Racism’: House Republican’s Remarks Spark Backlash
“The salted caramel mocha latte, the iced brown sugar soy milk shaken espresso, the white chocolate macadamia cream cold brew are the triumph of hyper-individualization over communal norms,” he writes. “When you order a dirty spiced chai with oat milk, you are not only wasting the time of other customers in line but also are signaling that your personal appetites demand an elaborate, customized response. You are asserting your primacy, unique in the complexity of your desires, and stand apart from your nation’s simple rituals. No wonder you’re alone.”
Grygiel makes no mention of the fact that a significant portion of Starbucks’ business model is based on customized coffee drinks.
Some readers slammed Grygiel, with several questioning whether his work was satire.
“This is satire, people. This has to be satire. I know it’s satire. Please tell me it’s satire,” wrote one reader.
Others tried to bring the conversation back to politics, which is the author’s stock in trade.
“The atomization of society begins with you taking about coffee and not the Trump administrations efforts to destabilize our democracy,” chastised another.
READ MORE: ‘Good Luck in the Midterms’: Anti-Trump Conservatives Smell Weakness in the President
“I think the largest problem with American society is all the fascists, but that is just my opinion,” suggested a reader.
“I don’t know,” said another reader. “I think the American obsession with assault rifles and the fact that the number of guns in private hands in America far exceeds the population may be a bigger threat to our society. But that’s just me. I can’t remember the last time a salted caramel mocha latte killed someone.”
Others blasted the paper.
“Here’s some more compelling evidence that we’re confronting the end of days: WaPo is running this fluff piece while Trump is hard at work starting WWIII,” warned a reader.
And while some declared they “agree with every word,” others lamented the “absolute swill coming out of the WaPo opinion section these days.”
“This might be the thing that finally prompts me to cancel my WaPo subscription,” wrote an apparent subscriber.
READ MORE: White House Confirms Trump’s Shift That Pushes SAVE Act Further Right
Image via Shutterstock
‘Blatant Racism’: House Republican’s Remarks Spark Backlash
‘Good Luck in the Midterms’: Anti-Trump Conservatives Smell Weakness in the President
‘Tell Me It’s Satire’: WaPo Roasted for Op-Ed Linking Lattes to Destruction of Society
‘Looking to Throw in the Towel?’: Trump Mocked as Administration Again Switches Priorities
Trump Once Again Directly Contradicts Pentagon Chief on Key Element of Iran War
‘Looking to Throw in the Towel?’: Trump Mocked as Administration Again Switches Priorities
Trump Once Again Directly Contradicts Pentagon Chief on Key Element of Iran War
‘Tell Me It’s Satire’: WaPo Roasted for Op-Ed Linking Lattes to Destruction of Society
‘Blatant Racism’: House Republican’s Remarks Spark Backlash
‘Good Luck in the Midterms’: Anti-Trump Conservatives Smell Weakness in the President
News3 days agoWhite House Confirms Trump’s Shift That Pushes SAVE Act Further Right
News3 days ago‘Dreaming of Gilead?’ WaPo Hit for Op-Ed Mourning Lack of Evangelicals in ‘Halls of Power’
News3 days ago‘Pure Amateur Hour’: Trump Slammed for ‘Absolutely Racing to Betray His Voters’
News3 days ago‘Flashing Red’: Jobs Report Sparks Expert Warnings of Recession — or Even Stagflation
News7 hours ago‘Blatant Racism’: House Republican’s Remarks Spark Backlash
News8 hours ago‘Good Luck in the Midterms’: Anti-Trump Conservatives Smell Weakness in the President
News4 hours ago‘Tell Me It’s Satire’: WaPo Roasted for Op-Ed Linking Lattes to Destruction of Society
News2 hours ago‘Looking to Throw in the Towel?’: Trump Mocked as Administration Again Switches Priorities
