Connect with us

BIGOTRY

‘Cake Tasting Didn’t Go as Planned’: Yet Another Same-Sex Couple Refused by Wedding Cake Baker, Because Jesus

Published

on

‘I Cannot With My Spiritual Conviction and Beliefs, Do Your Cake!’

A Tennessee same-sex couple is among the latest to experience discrimination cloaked in Christianity.

“Well cake tasting didn’t go quite as planned,” Brandi Ray wrote on Facebook, posting a screenshot of her text message with Susie’s Sweets bakery owner Susie Dennison.

“I really enjoyed our time together and I truly wish you the best but after realizing that your union will be of the same sex, I cannot with my spiritual conviction and beliefs, do your cake!” Dennison wrote, as Nashville’s News Channel 5 reports. “I want you to know in saying that, I do love you in The Lord! Had I known before you left, I would have said something then!”

Paul Dennison, Susie’s husband, told the local news outlet “that the business owners didn’t wish any ill will on Ray, but they feel that others could view the cake as an endorsement of same-sex marriage, which is something the business owners say they have strong religious convictions against.”

On Facebook Dennison posts photos of her cakes and invites “all of the ladies who have become engaged” to “setup a time for us to get together and talk about what you would like in taste and design for your cake.”

Tennessee has no protections against anti-LGBT discrimination at the state level.

Also last week, a same-sex couple in Denver say a videographer, citing his religious beliefs, refused to film their wedding. He also falsely claimed same-sex couples cannot produce “healthy families.”

On The Wedding Wire, Dennison writes that designing cakes has been “a blessing” for her.

“I had put my whole life into God, family and the church. Then, the empty nest was soon to be! I asked the Lord,’what am I to do’? The answer came to me that day! I have always love cooking. I started Susie’s Sweets, the rest is history,” she adds. “I do every cake as though I am doing it unto the Lord! This is their special day and should be treated with expertise and genuine care.”

The ACLU of Tennessee in a statement says, “Businesses open to the public can make decisions about what kinds of products or services they will provide – but they can’t pick and choose who they will serve.”

RELATED STORIES:

TOMI LAHREN SLAMS LGBT COMMUNITY FOR ATTACKING ‘MASCULINITY’ AND ‘TRADITIONAL MEN AND MARRIAGE’

PAT ROBERTSON: ‘HOMOSEXUALS’ WANT TO DESTROY SOCIETY TO GET ‘THEIR WEIRD WAY OF DOING SEX’ LEGITIMIZED

NUMBER OF HATE GROUPS SKYROCKET AS WHITE SUPREMACISTS LEAD THE WAY – THANKS TO TRUMP: SPLC

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

BIGOTRY

Franklin Graham Promotes Anti-Gay Chick-fil-A and Attacks College Group as ‘The Ones Fostering Hate and Bigotry’

Published

on

Franklin Graham has turned his Facebook-based ministry into one that frequently attacks the LGBTQ community, and Wednesday proved to be no different. The Evangelical leader with strong ties to President Donald Trump took to Facebook to promote Chick-fil-A, the $10 billion privately-owned faith-based fast food restaurant chain. And he blasted a college faculty group trying to keep the divisive restaurant from their campus.

“Guess where I ate lunch yesterday? Yes, at Chick-fil-A,” Graham bragged on Facebook. “They are always packed for a reason. Their restaurants are clean, and not only do they have a great chicken sandwich, but they have one of my favorite iced teas!”

Graham went on to claim that “at Kansas University, some progressive staff and administrators—are accusing Chick-fil-A of being a ‘bastion of bigotry’ and they don’t want them on campus. The Sexuality & Gender Diversity Faculty and Staff Council says Chick-fil-A ‘fosters hate and discrimination on multiple levels.’ That’s just simply not true.”

It is, in fact, true.

Through its charitable foundation Chick-fil-A’s owners have donated millions of dollars to anti-gay groups, including to an anti-gay hate group.

“This council and group of faculty are the ones fostering hate and bigotry, not Chick-fil-A!” Graham insisted, twisting the truth.

“All of this is because the founder Truett Cathy and his son Dan Cathy stood for traditional marriage and the business has donated to support some Christian charities,” Graham said.

Again, not true.

The Cathy family didn’t just stand for “traditional marriage.” They made offensive remarks about same-sex marriage, and again, they didn’t just donate to “some Christian charities.” They donated those millions of dollars to some very actively anti-gay organizations.

Some of those groups not only tried to block same-sex marriage from becoming legal, but at least one wanted to make “gay behavior” illegal, and even said gay people should be “exported” out of America.

Dan Cathy, now the chairman, president, and CEO of Chick-fil-A, has attacked marriage equality, saying, if you support same-sex marriage, you “are inviting God’s judgment on our nation,” and that we “shake our fist at Him” when we do.

That’s not just standing up for Christian beliefs.

Cathy also said same-sex marriage is the result of a “deprived” mind and called it “twisted up kind of stuff.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading

BIGOTRY

Trump Administration Urges US Supreme Court to Declare Firing a Worker for Being Gay Is Legal

Published

on

The Trump administration has just urged the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that firing an employee simply because they are gay is perfectly legal. The request comes in the form of a 34-page amicus brief, which was not required, but voluntary.

The brief, signed by Trump Solicitor General Noel Francisco, tells the Court it is the opinion of the administration’s Dept. of Justice that a “plain text” reading of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not protect gay people in the workplace from discrimination, including firing for being gay, as The Washington Blade, which was first to report, notes.

“The question here is not whether Title VII should forbid employment discrimination because of sexual orientation, but whether it already does,” the brief says. “The statute’s plain text makes clear that it does not; discrimination because of ‘sex’ forbids treating members of one sex worse than similarly situated members of the other — and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, standing alone, does not result in such treatment.”

President Trump has also stated he will not sign the Equality Act, which would specify that the Civil Rights of Act of 1964 does protect LGBTQ people from discrimination.

The Supreme Court will hear three cases related to anti-LGBTQ discrimination on October 8.

The move is consistent with the entirety of the Trump administration’s policies and actions.

Just ten days ago the Dept. of Justice tried to strong-arm the Equal Employment opportunity Commission to set aside up to eight years of findings and rulings and support the DOJ’s position firing LGBTQ workers is legal.

One week ago the DOJ in similar fashion urged the Supreme Court to rule that firing transgender workers is legal.

And on August 14 the Trump Dept. of Labor moved to prioritize the rights of so-called “religion-exercising organizations” over those of LGBTQ workers. The DOL offered a new proposal that appears to be a roadmap which faith-based organizations claiming to have religious beliefs or moral convictions can use to protect themselves from charges of discrimination.

As NCRM has reported previously, the Trump administration is the most anti-LGBT administration in modern U.S. history.

 

Image by Ted Eytan via Flickr and a CC license

This is a breaking news and developing story. Details may change. This story will be updated, and NCRM will likely publish follow-up stories on this news. Stay tuned and refresh for updates.

Continue Reading

BIGOTRY

Baptists Unanimously Vote Out Lesbian Couple Over Same-Sex Marriage: ‘It Was More Out of Spite’

Published

on

A lesbian couple from Mississippi says they were asked to leave their Baptist church over their relationship.

Mary Catherine Trollinger and her partner Olivia Jennings were notified by letter that they were no longer welcome at Gracewood Baptist Church in Southaven, where they met last year, reported WATN-TV.

Their pastor, Barry Baker, signed the letter, which stated he had warned them against pursuing an “unbiblical” and “degrading” same-sex relationship, and told the couple they had been unanimously — and “sadly” — voted out during a special business meeting at the church.

“I told you that the church could not allow you to live in unrepentant disobedience without addressing it,” Baker wrote. “We love you too much to neglect you.”

The pastor noted that the couple’s recent wedding — “on Father’s Day, no less,” Baker added — had prompted the banishment, which Trollinger’s mother supported.

“Not only did my mom say you can’t live here,” Trollinger said, “but my church said you can’t go here and it was in the same day, so I was pretty heartbroken was in a deep depression for a few months there.”

The couple met at Gracewood while Trollinger was serving as college director there, and they were asked to leave the church months ago, which they did, before they were officially voted out as members.

“It’s one thing if you send out a letter that’s generic, just a template, but it’s another thing to personalize the letter,” Trollinger said. “In that sense, all the things that were said it wasn’t out of love, it was more out of spite.”

The church declined to comment on the letter or the couple’s membership.

 

 

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2019 AlterNet Media.