Connect with us

Here’s The Video Of Hillary Clinton Meeting With #BlackLivesMatters Activists

Published

on

Headlines on the story don’t tell the full or fair version – actually watching the video does. 

“Watch: Wait Till You See What Hillary Just Said In Private Meeting With Black Lives Matter Activists”

“Hillary To ‘Black Lives Matter’ Activists: Maybe I’ll Just Talk To White People”

“Meeting Between Hillary and #BlackLivesMatter Activists Gets Confrontational”

“Black Lives Matter Movement Hijacks Democratic Party… Awkward Exchange with Hillary in New Hampshire”

Those are a few of the headlines today from right-wing or right-leaning sites about Hillary Clinton’s meeting with #BlackLivesMatter leaders last Tuesday. The group released video exclusively to GOOD, which edited it and added some background where necessary.

But do those headlines headlines do justice to the conversation, or to either Clinton or #BlackLivesMatter?

GOOD describes the video as “the exchange between the Democratic candidate and members of the Boston chapter of #BlackLivesMatter, where a somewhat defensive yet candid Clinton responds to several tough questions.”

“Clinton is refreshingly honest and authentic at some moments, and sharply defensive at others,” GOOD observes. “The most uncomfortable: The candidate responds to an activist’s assertion that ‘this is, and has always been, a white problem of violence,’ by suggesting she could talk ‘only to white people about how we’re going to deal with the very real problems,’ a suggestion both Clinton and the activist then acknowledge is not what either want.”

In the video, Clinton says there “has to be a reckoning,” about her support of her husband’s $19 billion Violent Crime and Law Enforcement Act, which is responsible for a 60% increase in incarceration for drug offenses. “But I also think there has to be some positive vision and plan that you can move people toward,” Clinton adds.

“Once you say this country has still not recovered from its original sin,” of slavery, Clinton tells the activists, “which is true…the next question is, ‘So what do you want me to do about it?'” Clinton said. “That’s what I’m trying to put together in a way that I can explain it and I can sell it. Because in politics, you can’t explain it and you can’t sell it, it stays on the shelf.”

Clinton also told the group their analysis of institutional racism “is totally fair.”

“It’s historically fair, it’s psychologically fair, it’s economically fair, but you’re going to have to come together as a movement and say here’s what we want done about it,” Clinton said. “Because you can get lip service from as many white people as you can pack into Yankee Stadium, and a million more like it, who are gonna say, ‘Oh, we get it, we get it. We’re going to be nicer.’ That’s not enough, at least in my book.”

One member of the group appeared to take umbrage with Clinton’s response.

“If you don’t tell black people what we need to do, then we won’t tell you all what you need to do,” he told the Democratic former Secretary of State. “This is and has always been a white problem of violence. There’s not much that we can do to stop the violence against us.”

“Respectfully, if that is your position, then I will talk only to white people about how we are going to deal with the very real problems,” Clinton replied. 

“What you just said was a form of victim blaming,” he accused. “You’re saying that what the black lives matter movement needs to do to change white hearts…”

Clinton responded, “I don’t believe you change hearts. I believe you change laws, you change allocation of resources. You change the way systems operate. You’re not going to change every heart. You’re not,” she said. “But at the end of the day we can do a whole lot to change some hearts and change some systems and create more opportunities for people who deserve to have them.”

“You can keep the movement going, which you have started, and through it, you may actually change some hearts,” she added. “But if that’s all that happens, we’ll be back here in 10 years having the same conversation. Because we will not have all of the changes that you deserve to see happen in your lifetime because of your willingness to get out there and talk about this.”

Watch the video, in two parts, below. It’s about 10 minutes total.

What do you think? Are the headlines accurate? Was it a productive conversation? Decide for yourself.

 

Image: Screenshot via GOOD.IS/YouTube
Hat tip: CBS News

 

 

Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

‘Embarrassed Emoji’: Trump Torched for Calling Major Drop in Port Traffic ‘Good’

Published

17 hours ago

on

May 8, 2025

By

President Donald Trump is facing backlash after claiming that a sharp decline in port traffic—and a significant drop in goods entering the U.S.—is actually a positive development. When warned that the slowdown could cost truckers and dock workers their paychecks or even their jobs, Trump praised the downturn, arguing it means the country isn’t “losing money.”

“That means we lose less money, you know?” President Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. “When I see that, that means we lose less money. Look, China was making over a trillion, $1.1 trillion, in my opinion. You know, different numbers from $500 billion to a trillion or a trillion, I think it was 1.1 trillion. And frankly, if we didn’t do business, we would have been better off.”

“Okay, you understand that?” Trump continued. “So when you say it’s slowed down, that’s a good thing, not a bad thing.”

The President’s remarks were quickly criticized.

READ MORE: ‘Downright Incompetent’: FBI Chief Blasted for ‘No Timeline and No Clue’

U.S. Senator Mark Warner (D-VA) commented, “It’s not a good thing. Dock workers & truck drivers don’t think it’s a good thing. Businesses don’t think it’s a good thing.”

U.S. Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA) wrote, “I represent the second largest container port in the U.S, I promise you it’s a bad thing.”

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins quoted Trump’s “good thing, not a bad thing” comment, then posted video of Seattle’s port commissioner saying, “We currently do not have any container ships at port right now.”

MSNBC anchor Stephanie Ruhle, who spent 14 years at top financial services companies before starting her journalism career, wrote that she had just sent the President’s comments “to every wall st source I have that supported our President.”

“Every response I got was some sort of embarrassed emoji.”

Watch the video below or at this link.

READ MORE: ‘Barely Literate’: Education Secretary’s ‘Deranged’ Letter Gets Major Red Ink Corrections

Continue Reading

News

‘Downright Incompetent’: FBI Chief Blasted for ‘No Timeline and No Clue’

Published

20 hours ago

on

May 8, 2025

By

Senate Appropriations Vice Chair Patty Murray (D-WA) delivered a one-two punch to FBI Director Kash Patel, who appeared at a budget hearing without bringing a budget.

“It was due last week, by law,” Senator Murray explained during Thursday’s hearing.

“I understand,” Director Patel replied.

“And your answer is I should just understand you’re not gonna follow the law?” Murray asked.

READ MORE: ‘Concept of a Plan’: Trump Hypes ‘Major Trade Deal’ With UK—Experts Say It’s Not

“My answer is that I am following the law, and I’m working with my interagency partners to do this and get you the budget that you are required to have,” Patel responded.

“And you have no timeline?” Murray asked.

“No,” Patel replied.

“Hmm,” said Murray. “Well, we also need a full budget request, not a single paragraph full of wild talking points that we saw with the skinny budget proposal. We’re now having a budget hearing, without a budget request. So, Director Patel, where is the FY2026 budget request for the FBI?”

“It’s, uh, being worked on, ma’am,” was Patel’s response.

“Have you reviewed it? Have you approved it?” Murray asked.

The back and forth continued, with Patel ultimately declaring, “I’m doing the best I can. I can’t make up answers, I’m gonna commit to you to work on getting you the information you need.”

READ MORE: ‘Barely Literate’: Education Secretary’s ‘Deranged’ Letter Gets Major Red Ink Corrections

“Well, that, that is insufficient and deeply disturbing,” Murray responded.

But the six-term Democratic Senator did not stop there.

Taking to social media, Murray blasted Patel again.

“Kash Patel, the conspiracy theorist that Republicans made FBI Director, came to a Senate hearing on the budget—with NO budget, NO timeline, and NO clue,” Senator Murray wrote atop video of her exchange with the FBI Director. “It’s downright incompetent, and it’s making America less safe. We need serious leadership at the FBI.”

Watch the video below or at this link.

READ MORE: ‘Most Corrupt Presidency’: State Dept. Acting as Musk’s Starlink ‘Sales Force’ Critics Say

Continue Reading

News

‘Concept of a Plan’: Trump Hypes ‘Major Trade Deal’ With UK—Experts Say It’s Not

Published

21 hours ago

on

May 8, 2025

By

Economic and political experts are panning President Donald Trump’s tariff “deal” with the UK, saying it doesn’t live up to his hype.

The President teased out the announcement Wednesday, at first not mentioning the alleged deal was with the UK.

“Big News Conference tomorrow morning at 10:00 A.M., The Oval Office, concerning a MAJOR TRADE DEAL WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF A BIG, AND HIGHLY RESPECTED, COUNTRY. THE FIRST OF MANY!!!”

At 5:42 AM, building up the excitement, he dropped this post: “This should be a very big and exciting day for the United States of America and the United Kingdom. Press Conference at The Oval Office, 10A.M. Thank you!”

READ MORE: ‘Most Corrupt Presidency’: State Dept. Acting as Musk’s Starlink ‘Sales Force’ Critics Say

Except the United Kingdom did not appear to agree.

“Until as recently as this week, British officials remained skeptical that a deal would be signed off imminently, and some were taken by surprise by Trump’s announcement,” The Wall Street Journal reported. “Some trade observers expected more of an outline than a fully hashed-out deal.”

Critics were quick to dismiss the President’s deal as lacking in substance.

“Trump’s so called ‘trade deal’ with UK is just like his ‘great’ healthcare plan: It’s the CONCEPT of a plan,” declared SiriusXM host Dean Obeidallah. “LITERALLY. Per reporting if you read past the headlines There is no deal – just a framework to start talks. But Trump knows the sheep of corporate media will cover this as a deal. It’s not.”

The Journal also noted that “U.K. officials said the pact won’t be a comprehensive trade agreement and will instead focus on reducing tariffs in specific sectors. They said some details remain yet to be finalized, which could mean further talks in the future.”

READ MORE: ‘Barely Literate’: Education Secretary’s ‘Deranged’ Letter Gets Major Red Ink Corrections

Bloomberg UK’s political editor Alex Wickham framed it this way: “UK providing a polite reality check to Trump’s posts about a ‘full and comprehensive’ deal UK-US deal will set out general terms of agreement: UK official Will set framework for further negotiations: UK official Focused on specific sectors, not traditional FTA: UK official.”

And doubling down, WSJ added that the “expected pact will be a far cry from the comprehensive trade deal Downing Street previously sought to negotiate with the U.S. after Britain quit the European Union a few years ago.”

Calling it “a photo op, with little macroeconomic significance,” Professor of Economics and Public Policy Justin Wolfers offered this explanation:

“Trump’s “big” trade deal is with the UK:
– It’s a framework not a deal
– They’re our 11th largest trading partner
– They’re only 3% of US trade (97% to go)
– They *already* charge average tariffs of only 1% (limited upside)”

U.S. Senator Ron Wyden commented, “About 2 percent of our imports come from Great Britain. So put me down as kind of skeptical that there is much there, there.”

Hedge fund founder and chief investment officer Spencer Hakimian observed: “So after 4 weeks of negotiating with our closest ally, whom we run a *trade surplus* with, all we were able to accomplish was a continuation of the 10% tariff rate with them? How are we going to possibly negotiate anything substantive with China, Europe, Mexico, Vietnam, Taiwan, etc.? The gimmick president doing gimmicky things. And meanwhile our economy will pay the price for his desire to see himself on TV.”

Brendan Duke, a self-described “Tax/budget nerd” for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) noted: “The Liberation Day reciprocal tariff on UK imports was 10% and it’s now going to be 10%. Art of the Deal folks.”

READ MORE: ‘Pushed Up to the Edge of the Cliff’: GOP Proposals Would Kick Millions Off Health Care

 

Image via Reuters

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.