NYT Statistician Nate Silver: Standard And Poor’s Ratings Are Substandard
Nate Silver is a world-class statistician who started FiveThirtyEight.com and was immediately heralded as a genius during the 2008 elections. The New York Times began publishing Silver’s blog in a deal made last year.
So, for Silver to crunch some numbers and come up with statements like, “Five years ago, if you were an investor looking for guidance on which country’s debt was the safest to invest in, Standard & Poor’s ratings wouldn’t have done much to help you navigate the headwinds of the financial crisis,” and the data “suggests that S.&P. is making a lot of judgment calls about countries they have no particular knowledge about,” is rather embarrassing for Standard and Poor’s.
Silver continues, with, “Keep in mind that even when it comes to the United States, S.&P. made a $2 trillion error that reflects their lack of understanding of the way that bills are scored by the Congressional Budget Office. Are we to expect that they add value based on their perceptions of the political climate in Kazakhstan, or Cyprus, or Uganda?”
More:
“None of this would be a problem if S.&P.’s ratings had performed well. But there is little evidence that they do.”
“S.&P.’s bond ratings from five years ago would have told you almost nothing about the risk of a default today. They had no insight about the threats in European markets, nor about which countries in Europe were relatively more likely to default,” and, “they are violating their mission of providing the most earnest and accurate assessment of a country’s default risk at any given time.”
Silver ends with, “The fact that billions of dollars in wealth are tied up in the judgments of a company with such a poor record is all the proof you should require that the global financial system is in need of reform.”
Yup.
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.