NOM’s Newest Lie: Starbucks Wants To Eliminate Traditional Marriage
NOM, the National Organization For Marriage, has gone too far this time, rolling out a new campaign claiming — lying — that Starbucks wants to eliminate traditional marriage. A re-tooled website, “Dump Starbucks,” first registered in 2007 to NOM and listing NOM president Brian Brown as the contact, claims that Starbucks “has taken a corporate-wide position that marriage between one man and one woman should be eliminated and that same-sex marriage should become the norm.” NOM explains the accusation, ludicrous on its face, by referring to a corporate memorandum.
“On January 12th, 2012, Starbucks issued a memorandum declaring that same-sex marriage ‘is core to who we are and what we value as a company’,” the Dump Starbucks website claims.
Of course, NOM is twisting Starbucks’ words.
Here are Starbucks’ actual words, in a January letter to employees:
Starbucks is proud to join other leading Northwest employers in support of Washington State legislation recognizing marriage equality for same-sex couples. Starbucks strives to create a company culture that puts our partners first, and our company has a lengthy history of leading and supporting policies that promote equality and inclusion.
This important legislation is aligned with Starbucks business practices and upholds our belief in the equal treatment of partners. It is core to who we are and what we value as a company.
(Emphasis mine.)
See? That “it” isn’t same-sex marriage, but equality. NOM always did have a tough time with nuance, actual words, and facts.
How long do you think it will be before Starbucks either issues a cease and desist letter to NOM and GoDaddy, NOM’s registrar, or just hauls NOM into court?
One has to wonder, why did NOM register “Dump Starbucks” all the way back in 2007? NOM was barely in existence then, their own website registered in June of 2007. Odd…
Regardless, this all goes back to the fact that Starbucks, along with dozens of other local and national corporations, banded together to support same-sex marriage in the state of Washington. Starbucks is based in Seattle, and like many companies, says same-sex marriage is good for business. 70 companies also have signed a letter stating DOMA hurts businesses.
In January, Brian Brown actually threatened Starbucks, telling the coffee retailer to “stay out of marriage fights.â€
Here’s the actual wording on NOM’s new “Dump Starbucks” website:
We are urging consumers across the globe to ‘Dump Starbucks’ because it has taken a corporate-wide position that marriage between one man and one woman should be eliminated and that same-sex marriage should become the norm. As such, Starbucks has deeply offended at least half its US customers, and the vast majority of its international customers.
On January 12th, 2012, Starbucks issued a memorandum declaring that same-sex marriage ‘is core to who we are and what we value as a company.’
Starbucks also used its resources to participate in a legal case seeking to overturn a federal law declaring marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
In many areas of the world where Starbucks does business, the concept of ‘gay marriage’ is unheard of and deeply offensive to cultural, moral and religious values.
In taking these actions, Starbucks has declared a culture war on all people of faith (and millions of others) who believe that the institution of marriage as one man and one woman is worth preserving.
A portion of every cup of coffee purchased at a Starbucks anywhere in the world goes to fund this corporate assault on marriage.
We urge consumers across the globe to join the ‘Dump Starbucks’ campaign.
Please sign the petition to register your protest.
Note that last line?
Exactly. NOM, true to form, is twisting facts to pad their bank account and email fundraising list.
On NOM’s blog today, Brian Brown also added:
“Starbucks has taken a corporate position in support of redefining marriage for all of society. We will not tolerate an international company attempting to force its misguided values on citizens. The majority of Americans and virtually every consumer in some countries in which Starbucks operates believe that marriage is between one man and one woman. They will not be pleased to learn that their money is being used to advance gay marriage in society.”
And,
“We respect the important role of businesses in providing goods, services and jobs, and that people of diverse moral views build great companies working together,” Brown said. “But Starbucks has corporately, as an organization, endorsed and helped pass gay marriage in the state of Washington. Its executive vice president of partner resources has stated that gay marriage “is aligned with Starbucks business practices and upholds our belief in the equal treatment of partners. It is core to who we are and what we value as a company.” Corporations should not take sides in a culture war that pits a company against half the American people, and nearly all its consumers in some international markets.”
No doubt, NOM will also be attacking Google, Apple, and hundreds of other companies that support same-sex marriage equality — just like the majority of Americans — right? Or is Starbucks just an easy target because it’s easy for consumers to feel like they’re doing something by giving up Starbucks and walking over to Dunkin’ Donuts? Ask them to give up their Google search or iPhones and NOM would have been very unsuccessful, right?
And since I’m writing this while at a Starbucks, just to taunt NOM, I’m going to order another cup of coffee.
Ah…
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
 |
Port Charlotte, Florida, is part of Charlotte County — which voted for President Donald Trump by a solid two-to-one margin in 2024. It was named one of the top ten places to retire in 2012.
Still seen as a deeply red state, Democrats are making inroads into the Sunshine State. Ahead of the August primary, in the race for governor, Republican Byron Donalds often polls ahead of Democrat David Jolly but only by single digits, according to data from The New York Times. Donald Trump won the state by 13 points in 2024.
A letter to the editor highly critical of President Donald Trump and his MAGA base in a Port Charlotte news outlet could be seen as surprising.
“MAGA crowd, Trump are all about winning,” reads the headline.
“Donald Trump and the MAGA movement have turned American politics into a fan-based team sport,” writes its author, Gayle Yarnall.
“Governing has become an us versus them rivalry regardless of the consequences. It is all about winning,” she laments.
“The 2024 election is long over. Yet, there are Trump signs, banners, and flags still posted around. It is akin to displaying the flag of your favorite teams like the Patriots or the Buckeyes. What is the purpose except to express that, ‘I’m on a winning team’?” Yarnall asks.
“No one will be persuaded to vote for Trump. The election is done and he won. Is there any memory of Reagan, Biden, Bush, Obama, or Clinton flags or signs posted months or years after the election? Of course not.”
Yarnall calls the still-flying banners and flags “visual reminders” for “those with low self-esteem, feeling left out and unheard.”
“They scream, ‘look at me, we won, I’m on a winning team,'” she says.
“Even when gas prices spike, the cost of tariffs are passed on, a war continues, inflation is rising in all sectors it matters not because my team won.”
In a last-ditch plea, Yarnall asks her neighbors, “Please remember to vote!”
Image via Shutterstock
Right-wing journalist Ben Domenech isn’t aligned with GOP wisdom that the Republican Party should do well in the November midterm elections. In a lengthy written conversation with The New York Times, Domenech says he is “skeptical.”
“Republicans still seem to think that, thanks to redistricting and their advantages in fund-raising, they could buck historical trends and hold on, perhaps even in the House,” Domenech told the Times’ John Guida. “They’re just scared about gas prices. Personally, I’m skeptical.”
Looking specifically at Maine, which Republicans see as the “linchpin” to holding the Senate majority, according to Guida, Domenech also sends a warning. The race will be between U.S. Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) and Democratic insurgent newcomer Graham Platner, who has already faced numerous scandals.
“The interesting thing about this whole focus on Maine is that if you talk to Senate Republican staff and consultants, they’re actually less worried about it than other states,” says Domenech. “This is partially because of Platner’s shall we say unique collection of scandals and challenges, but it’s also because of enormous faith in Collins as a survivor.”
Collins, 73, is running for her sixth term after being first elected in 1996.
Guida points to a Politico report on a memo that states: “the political fundamentals in Maine remain challenging, and it is a fatal mistake to assume Platner is too damaged to win.”
“I think that’s correct,” says Domenech, “and top Republicans should actually be more concerned.”
“Platner clearly has energy behind him. He speaks to a desire on the left for a strong message, and he’s shown no signs of bowing to pressure to get out for a more centrist-coded candidate,” he adds. “Collins is absolutely capable of winning, but national assumptions are taking over based on her last election, in 2020, when she came back from what seemed like a deep hole by keeping her campaign hyperlocal.”
Domenech says that Republicans do have some concerns, specifically about three states Donald Trump won by double digits in 2024: Alaska, Iowa and Ohio.
In Ohio, former U.S. Senator Sherrod Brown is seeking to return to the Senate, and is running against “an appointee who has never won a Senate election, Jon Husted.”
In Alaska, Democrat Mary Peltola is running against Dan Sullivan, the Republican incumbent who “has the advantage there, but again, we’re talking about a unique state, and Peltola is an Alaska Native,” says Domenech. That race is now considered a “toss up” by The Center for Politics’ “Crystal Ball,” which also now rates the Ohio race as a “toss up.”
Iowa could become a difficult race for Republicans as well. Domenech warns it “could turn out to be a real test for Trump’s tariff policies, which have been a decidedly mixed bag in many of the states that backed him. The president will probably have to take that argument to the people of Iowa himself.”
Overall, says Domenech, Republicans’ confidence “comes from a belief that Democratic radicalism, particularly the various examples of what they view as a renewed cultural leftism in opposition to Trump during his first term, will play in their favor.”
Image via Shutterstock
Prominent conservative talk radio host Erick Erickson has a new label for President Donald Trump: “clown.”
On his Substack newsletter, Erickson slams the president over his approach to the Iran war, for which, he notes, Trump has at least 39 times in the last 65 days “declared the United States and Iran were close to a deal only to have the Iranians openly mock him and deny it.”
He notes too that Trump on Thursday morning told “Fox & Friends” that the bombing of Iran would resume. That changed quickly.
“By the afternoon, he declared bombings would cease because a deal was close,” Erickson writes. “He claimed buy-in from the Egyptians, the Emirates, the Saudis, the Kuwaitis, the Israelis, the Iranians, and more.”
Both Egypt and Israel said they had no knowledge of a deal.
“The President, the other days, said Iran was playing us,” says Erickson. “The only one being played is President Trump. A state of war exists between Iran and its neighbors. The ceasefire is a farce. The President has turned into a clown.”
Erickson is no moderate — he was once the editor-in-chief of the right-wing website RedState and was a Fox News contributor. His bio on Spotify says his podcast “cuts through the chaos with bold clarity and biblical conviction.”
Erickson goes on to call it “Obamaesque” to think that any negotiation with a “terrorist regime that is premised on bringing about the apocalypse” is possible.
He says Trump chose to “engage” Iran and criticizes him for dealing “a serious blow” but not a “knockout” one. And he criticizes Trump for ordering Israel “to pull its punches.”
“We have now harmed our relationships with our Middle Eastern allies who depend on us for protection,” writes Erickson. “The situation is now more unstable than before the war began and it is all because of a single person who swears he’ll get a deal any day now.”
“The President should be embarrassed,” Erickson charges. “Instead, he’ll be mad at everyone except the man in his mirror.”
Image via Reuters
Helicopter Circles as Gloved Officers Test Grass Over Apparent ?86 47? Mall Message
Conservative Talk Radio Host’s Brutal New Label for Trump: ‘Clown’
What Democratic Voters Actually Want
Conservative Insider Throws Cold Water on GOP’s Midterm Confidence
Letter From Deep Red Florida Torches ‘Low Self-Esteem’ MAGA Voters
Letter From Deep Red Florida Torches ‘Low Self-Esteem’ MAGA Voters
Conservative Insider Throws Cold Water on GOP’s Midterm Confidence
Conservative Talk Radio Host’s Brutal New Label for Trump: ‘Clown’
What Democratic Voters Actually Want
Helicopter Circles as Gloved Officers Test Grass Over Apparent ?86 47? Mall Message
News4 days agoSteve Schmidt Warns the Man With the Nuclear Codes Is ‘Psychologically Incontinent’
News24 hours agoHelicopter Circles as Gloved Officers Test Grass Over Apparent ?86 47? Mall Message
News3 days agoLetter From Deep Red Trump Country Blasts President as ‘Low-IQ Idiot’
News3 days agoHard-Right Groups Expanded Power Across the Trump Administration in 2025: Report
News3 days agoDemocrats Are Bleeding Voters in Dozens of Swing Districts: Report
News2 days agoJohnson Scrambles to Defend Trump’s ‘I Love the Inflation’ Remark — Critics Don’t Buy It
News3 days agoCNN Fact-Checker Scorches Trump Over the Price of Gas
News2 days agoGOP Leader Skips Trump’s Bill Signing—Then Pins Three-Year High Inflation on His Iran War
