Connect with us

New York Times’ Charles M. Blow’s Disappointing Insult To Bloggers



Late Tuesday night, in what he labeled a “revelation,” New York Times’ visual op-ed columnist Charles M. Blow unleashed a disappointing insult to bloggers, comparing them to karaoke singers. Blow, whose work I admire greatly, and with whom I have publicly engaged, and publicly credited with bringing the civil rights abuses of New York City’s Police Department’s “stop and frisk” outrage to light, truly misunderstands blogging and the thousands of smart, credible, and passionate journalists who have chosen the blogging platform as their niche. Charles Blow owes not only his fellow bloggers at the New York Times — but more importantly, the hardworking and usually low-paid political, independent, professional blogging community — an apology.

Blow, Tuesday night, wrote via Twitter:

I’m pretty certain most professional singers don’t hold karaoke singers in high regard, so this isn’t a case of projection. Professional singers may not dislike karaoke singers — they may even get gratification hearing them enjoy themselves — but there’s no question that professional singers overall don’t place karaoke singers at their level. Which is the point Blow was making: I’m better than bloggers. I’m a writer. There’s a difference. Perhaps seeing a few angry tweets, Blow that night appeared to attempt to backtrack, and responded to one angry follower, John S. Wilson, with, “heard an amazing karaoke sing tonight & thought wow: sometimes you just need a stage and a mic bc you want to sing w/o pressure,” and then attempted to explain it all away, writing, simply, “l blog.” Wilson, as his Twitter bio states, is a contributing writer for Black Enterprise, Mediaite, the Huffington Post, Politic 365, and the founder of Policy Diary, so perhaps Blow felt obligated to walk back his comments a bit. Here are Blow’s tweets, and my one-way response:[<a href=”” target=”_blank”>View the story “NY Times’ Charles M. Blow’s Amazing Insult To Bloggers” on Storify</a>]<br /> <h1>NY Times’ Charles M. Blow’s Amazing Insult To Bloggers</h1> <h2></h2> <p>Storified by David Badash · Wed, Aug 15 2012 15:01:47  </p> <div>Revelation: karaoke is to singers what blogging is to writers #thatisallCharles M. Blow</div> <div>And I blog. But it’s a chance to say something but a much more informal. Sometimes you just need a stage…Charles M. Blow</div> <div>@PruneJuiceMedia not a knock. It’s just very democratic and less formal. I blog myself. It’s great when you have something to express…Charles M. Blow</div> <div>@JohnWilson l blogCharles M. Blow</div> <div>@JohnWilson heard an amazing karaoke sing tonight & thought wow: sometimes you just need a stage and a mic bc you want to sing w/o pressureCharles M. Blow</div> <div>@BeckyGMartinez certainly not the way it was meant…Charles M. Blow</div> <div>.@CharlesMBlow says a highly-compensated NYTimes writer who needn’t worry about advertising, traffic, running a business, helping community.David Badash</div> <div>.@CharlesMBlow My respect for you aside, bloggers accomplish more in a day than a NYTimes writer does in a month. That was unfair, wrong.David Badash</div> <div>.@CharlesMBlow You saying, “I blog” is like me telling Michael Phelps, “I swim.” You truly have no idea what real bloggers do every day.David Badash</div> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>Blow truly has no idea what professional bloggers do. And while I have never liked the label “blogger,” apparently it fits the genre of my work, which, in November, will mark the beginning of my fifth year as a professional blogger.

Most professional bloggers I know, including me, work 12-18 hours a day, and often seven days a week. Practically not an hour goes by, if we’re awake, that we’re not working.

I publish on average 10-12 articles a day, and about four each weekend day. The vast majority average 500-750 words, though some are shorter, and a great many longer. I am blessed to have about 20 folks who contribute to our site, although 90% of the posts I write myself.

Bloggers break news. We’re often the “go-to” source for many readers. Bloggers have been known to take down politicians, expose wrongdoing and hypocrisy, and, frankly, tell truth to power in situations that even the New York Times wouldn’t.

On top of all this, we generally work alone. Usually for most of us, certainly for me, there’s no secretary, assistant, or even intern.

We deal with hundreds of emails a day, including requests for ad pricing from potential clients, requests from heavily funded non-profits for free ads, requests from publishers to review books, requests from distraught citizens for information or to highlight their unjust plight, demands for one-on-one debates from readers who have an opposing point of view, hate mail, and requests from every PR person imaginable to do a story on the client or product they get paid to rep that we wouldn’t get paid to write about. Of course, then there are the countless press releases…

Daily, bloggers are writers, editors, researchers, photographers and photo editors, reporters, graphic designers, advertising salespeople, social media directors, public relations directors, and accountants. We are, in fact, small business owners.

And we are obsessed with producing quality content that will interest readers and expand our audience.

But then, of course, there are the personal reasons we chose advocacy journalism and running a “blog” to begin with.

For me, I decided to start The New Civil Rights Movement within mere hours of California’s Prop 8 passing in 2008. If you’ve ever had a calling, if you’ve ever experienced a life-changing event, you’ll understand when I say, Prop 8 was mine.

And so, at the end of every day, which is usually after midnight, I often think about all the stories I wanted to write about that I just didn’t have time to cover.

For a writer, for a journalist, that’s a pretty tough thing to deal with on a daily basis, knowing there are good and important stories that don’t get told, and people I could help, issues I could expose, information I could share, that I just didn’t have time to because I can’t keep my eyes open any longer.

Meanwhile, working those 12+ hours every day nets most bloggers not a big income (despite the fact that here at The New Civil Rights Movement, we’re rapidly approaching one million hits a month, paying the rent isn’t easy.) Certainly not what we can all assume is the hefty six-figure salary with benefits, a 401(k), and possibly an assistant, that, say a New York Times op-ed writer earns — and, no doubt deserves.

So, Mr. Blow, when you disparage bloggers as karaoke singers, you’re disparaging people who work hard, are small business owners, and wear far more hats than you do at your job. Blogging isn’t “fun,” it’s not a way to express yourself, it’s hard work and it’s work that only pays when you publish. A day off means several day’s worth of lost ad revenue. There are no paid sick days. No paid vacations. No 401(k). No company-funded medical insurance (I pay about $700 a month on my plan.) No company car. No company cell phone. No company tech department to fix our computers. No water cooler talk.

We don’t have the luxuries you do, nor the resources you do, yet speaking for myself, I can’t imagine doing anything else, because my number one goal is to help my community, help people understand what we’re fighting for, and advance equality.

Blogging is hard work. Bloggers change hearts and minds. We help inform the public. And we have earned, and deserve, far more respect than Charles M. Blow, and others, give us.

Mr. Blow did not respond to an email requesting comment on this article.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.


Former DOJ Official Says Audio of Trump Admitting to Keeping ‘War Plans’ Makes it ‘Inconceivable’ He Will Not Be Charged



A former top U.S. Dept. of Justice official says it is “inconceivable” that Donald Trump will not be charged, based on reports Special Counsel Jack Smith has an audio recording of the ex-president admitting he was in possession of a classified Pentagon document detailing a possible attack on Iran.

“I think if this audio tape exists, this is not a question of if there are going to be charges. It’s just a question of when,” announced NBC News/MSNBC legal analyst Andrew Weissmann, the well-known former FBI General Counsel who worked at DOJ for two decades.

Importantly, Weissmann, who made his remarks on MSNBC Thursday, notes that the document in question, if it is as described, contains “war plans.”

“And the proof that we have learned just publicly is so strong. And Jack Smith is such a competent and aggressive prosecutor. It is inconceivable to me that this would not be charged, and having a tape recording of the prospective defendant admitting his possession of a classified document that he had no right to have,” Weissmann says.

RELATED: ‘Absolutely Blockbuster Evidence’: Experts Stunned Over Trump ‘Espionage Act’ Bombshell That Pressures ‘DOJ to Indict’

“And not just any classified document. I think it’s really important to remember that what he talks about reportedly, is a classified document involving something that is unbelievably sensitive, which is war plans of the United States against another country.”

Where news broke Wednesday NYU Law professor of law Ryan Goodman, a former U.S. Dept. of Defense Special Counsel, wrote: “War plans are among the most highly classified documents. Puts pressure on DOJ to indict, and a jury to convict.”

Some say, based on the audio, Trump might have been holding the document as he was being recorded at his Bedminster, New Jersey golf resort, allegedly discussing it.

“Make no mistake. This is squarely an Espionage Act case,” Goodman also said, calling the news a “bombshell.”

Explaining the gravity of the document, Weissmann notes, “this is not just taking love letters of Kim Jong Un or salacious material about the president in France. This is exactly what the Department of Justice and the intelligence community is worried about.”

Continuing to explain just how serious this is, Weissmann served up the ground rules.

“Let’s remember government documents, whether classified or not, belong to the government. They are not to be retained by a private citizen. And the former president is a private citizen. So for instance, when I was in the Department of Justice, the number of documents I could take when I left the Department of Justice would be zero. So you’re not supposed to have that possession of government documents. If they are classified, there can be an additional type of charge, but it’s not required that that material be classified or classified at a particular level.”

READ MORE: Grassley Admits He Doesn’t Care if GOP’s Accusations Against ‘Vice President Biden’ Are True or Not – He Vows to Pursue Them

“What you’re looking at here is whether the person either knowingly took the documents or knowingly retained the documents. Important this tape recording, if it exists, as recorded, is that you’ve got Donald Trump admitting that he has in his possession a classified document – doesn’t matter if it’s Secret, Top Secret, it’s classified, that itself is a crime.”

And then finally, with respect to dissemination, the recording is that there does appear to be at least some dissemination of the information because Donald Trump, although he doesn’t turn the document over or quote from it, he does talk about what is in there. In other words, the reason we’re all talking about the fact that involves war plans involving Iran is because reportedly that is what Donald Trump said was in the document. If that proves out, that is a form of dissemination.”

On social media later Thursday, Weissman tweeted, “Days, not months…” suggesting he believes an indictment of Trump would be coming sooner rather than later.

Watch Weissmann below or at this link.


Continue Reading


Evangelical Pastor With Ties to DeSantis Denies He’s Endorsing Biblical Call for Death to Gays



A Florida pastor with ties to GOP Governor Ron DeSantis insists his recent remarks attacking U.S. Senator Ted Cruz should not be viewed as an endorsement of the biblical call for gay people to be executed. But he’s not saying he is opposed to it either.

As The Daily Beast first reported, Tom Ascol, the senior pastor of Grace Baptist Church in Cape Coral, Florida, blasted the Texas Republican Senator, who surprised many when he called Uganda’s new “Kill the Gays” law “horrific & wrong.”

“Any law criminalizing homosexuality or imposing the death penalty for ‘aggravated homosexuality’ is grotesque & an abomination. ALL civilized nations should join together in condemning this human rights abuse,” Cruz actually tweeted.

That would be the same Ted Cruz who in 2015 claimed gay people were waging a “jihad” against Christians.

Pastor Ascol, who delivered the invocation at Governor DeSantis’ second inauguration, has been called the man who could bring evangelicals from Donald Trump and deliver them to Ron DeSantis.

On Tuesday Ascol tweeted, “Tell it to God, Ted.”

READ MORE: Watch: Ron DeSantis Travels to New Hampshire to Claim Kids Are Being ‘Forced’ to Choose Pronouns

He then quoted the Book of Leviticus, writing: “If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.”

“Was this law God gave to His old covenant people ‘horrific and wrong’?” Ascol asked.

Ascol two hours later tweeted, “Amazing how many professing Christians, even self-designated ‘conservative’ ones, are embarrassed by God’s Word. Just quote some unpopular words of God & watch what happens. Many so-called Christians react the same way that unashamed unbelievers do. It’s a commentary.”

Cruz did not reply, but some others did.

David Smith, whose Twitter bio reads, “25 yrs trusting Jesus!” replied: “We no longer live under the Levitical laws @tomascol.”

“If so, we would have to apply the same standard to adultery. (Leviticus 20:10) I agree that all of these things are sin, but where does grace come in? Jesus was clearly in no hurry to condemn in John 8:1-11.”

Pastor Ascol apparently liked the reply from Steven Hasty, which reads: “Many of you are missing the point. If you’re understanding this Tweet to mean Pastor Tom thinks we should start executing homosexuals, you’re missing it. Instead, he’s challenging the standards of Cruz. Where does Cruz derive his standards?”

READ MORE: ‘Barking’: DeSantis Mocked as His Crew Races to Protect Him From Criticism After He Attacks Reporter

Apparently whether or not it’s acceptable to execute LGBTQ people isn’t an issue (except it is, since the entire “debate” its based on Uganda’s new “Kill the Gays” law.)

“Pastor Tom” told Hasty, “You are exactly right. Some people don’t read carefully. Others, evidently, don’t reason well. Thanks for clarifying & accurately expressing what I *actually* wrote. Keep pressing on.”

Ascol didn’t say whether or not he supports the execution of LGBTQ people, he’s merely debating, as Hasty put it, “standards.”

The Daily Beast also reports, “Ascol’s tweet…certainly seemed to suggest that the execution of gay people had a biblical blessing,” and notes that “even on careful reading, most reasonable people would assume Ascol was suggesting that Uganda’s anti-gay law is not intrinsically ‘horrific and wrong.'”

Ascol, The Beast adds, “has repeatedly called for homicide charges against any woman who has an abortion for whatever reason. He has compared choosing to terminate a pregnancy to retaining a killer for hire.”

“’It’s like saying if I don’t murder someone, but I just contracted a murderer to murder someone, I’m not culpable,’ Ascol said on a Christian radio show in 2022.”

The tweet posted to the top of Ascol’s Twitter page says, “If your commitment to the authority of Scripture is limited by cultural sensitivities then it’s not really Scripture’s authority to which you are committed.”

Supporting or opposing the execution of LGBTQ people isn’t about “cultural sensitivities.”


Continue Reading


‘Barking’: DeSantis Mocked as His Crew Races to Protect Him From Criticism After He Attacks Reporter



Continuing his official presidential campaign kickoff this week, Florida GOP Governor Ron DeSantis delivered a speech to New Hampshire voters Thursday morning but refused to take questions from the audience. Afterward, when a reporter simply asked why, DeSantis blasted him, saying repeatedly, “Are you blind?” because he was talking to individual supporters at the time.

The candidate’s campaign team immediately swarmed to protect him on social media.

NBC News senior national political reporter Jonathan Allen on Twitter posted the video (below) and wrote that DeSantis had “lashed out at a reporter for asking him about it while he was chatting with members of the crowd individually.”

At NBC News, Allen’s headline reads: “Ron DeSantis loses his temper with a reporter: ‘Are you blind?'”

Allen reports DeSantis “became noticeably agitated” and “lashed out at a reporter — twice barking ‘Are you blind?'”

The reporter who had asked DeSantis why he wouldn’t take questions was Steve Peoples, chief political reporter for The Associated Press, who tweeted: “Here in Laconia, NH at his first stop in state as presidential candidate, DeSantis speaks for 58 minutes. He takes no questions from audience.”

READ MORE: Grassley Admits He Doesn’t Care if GOP’s Accusations Against ‘Vice President Biden’ Are True or Not – He Vows to Pursue Them

“People are coming up to me, talking to me,” DeSantis said. “What are you talking about? Are you blind? Are you blind? People are coming up to me, talking to me whatever they want to talk to me about.”

Allen adds that the Florida governor’s decision to not take questions “was surprising and frustrating to some Republicans who came to hear DeSantis speak.”

On social media, many were also not impressed.

“Some of us warned that DeSantis wasn’t ready for the national media or public spotlight, that he had been coddled in Florida for far too long, and that his media team of Pushaw, Redfern, et al spend too much time trolling on Twitter and not helping him,” observed MSNBC’s Mehdi Hasan.

But the question really is why wouldn’t a candidate for president, who has been in politics for over a decade, be excited to talk to prospective supporters and take their questions, especially given the history of states like New Hampshire and Iowa, where establishing that personal relationship historically has been critical to the success of a candidate’s campaign?

Former federal prosecutor, former DeSantis administration official, and former Republican Ron Filipkowski noted, “Ron DeSnowflake lost his cool again and had another freakout. This guy can’t deal with people.”

READ MORE: ‘Absolutely Blockbuster Evidence’: Experts Stunned Over Trump ‘Espionage Act’ Bombshell That Pressures ‘DOJ to Indict’

Observing DeSantis is “so out of his depth,” former journalist Ed Moltzen writes: “There are towns in New Hampshire with the official title ‘Town Moderator’ – people who assist with fielding audience questions to political candidates during forums. That’s how much open Q & A is in the political DNA of New Hampshire.”

Huffpost White House correspondent S.V. Dáte had warned, “Just watch. DeSantis’ social media arsonists will fan this interaction for days.”

And indeed, DeSantis’ crew was quick to attack, which Dáte pointed to.

Governor DeSantis’ press secretary Bryan Griffin quickly moved to falsely frame the interaction.

“This @AP reporter asked this question while @RonDeSantis was surrounded by voters in New Hampshire asking him questions and taking pictures,” Griffin tweeted. “Perfectly illustrative of the modern media shutting their eyes and ears to the truth to push their narrative.”

The question was clearly about DeSantis’ refusal to take questions from the audience, so the audience could hear his answers.

Christina Pushaw, DeSantis’ far-right former press secretary who moved to his presidential campaign as his rapid response director, responded to Griffin to attack the reporter.

“Very diplomatic of you to refer to the AP activist as a reporter!” she said.

But journalist Marcus Baram replied to Griffin: “You KNOW what the reporter meant.
Not a meet-and-greet with lots of people in a crowded room.
Questions asked in a setting where the person has time to ask the governor without distractions, and he has the time to respond with a substantive answer.
Campaigning 101.”

Watch DeSantis below or at this link.

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.