Connect with us

Maryland Same-Sex Marriage Bills: So What Happened At The Hearing?

Published

on

Two committees from the Maryland House of Delegates heard debate Friday from lawmakers and lawyers, laypeople and laity, pastors and priests —  both for and against two highly-contested same-sex civil marriage bills during a marathon debate that lasted ten hours. One bill would recognize the right of lesbian and gay couples to marry, making their relationships equal and legal under the law, the other would impose a constitutional ban on all same-sex marriages in the state of Maryland, codifying discrimination and second class citizenship directly into the constitution.

No vote has taken place yet.

Governor Martin O’Malley, who, like New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, and Washington Governor Christine Gregoire, sponsored the same-sex marriage equality bill and delivered opening remarks as Friday’s hearing began. O’Malley is certain to sign a same-sex marriage equality bill were it to make its way through the full House and Senate. A similar bill last year passed the Senate but not the House. Currently there is not a majority for or against same-sex marriage in Maryland.

“This bill balances equal protection of individual civil marriage rights with the important protection of religious freedom for all,” O’Malley testified.

“It is not right or just that the children of gay couples should have lesser protections than the children of other families in our state,” O’Malley added, according to a report in The Washington Blade. “Nor would it be right to force religious institutions to conduct marriages that conflict with their own religious beliefs and teachings.”

Testimony against same-sex marriage was often heated and vociferous, relying primarily on bible-based rhetoric, ignorance, and flawed ideas of same-sex relationships, along with flawed and refuted studies, while testimony for same-sex marriage relied on primarily on legal arguments, personal experiences, and included a great many religious leaders who support same-sex marriage.

But not all religious leaders who testified were supportive of gay marriage. Nor were some of their congregants.

“All these ministers talking about their homosexuals — let’s go chapter and verse and see who’s a liar,” one anti-gay citizen yelled, preaching from the Bible, adding, “homosexuals destroy the foundation of civilization,” and “the homosexuals will be cast in a lake of fire.” His testimony lasted almost five minutes.

Another arguing against marriage equality claimed that “lifestyle choice” leads to HIV/AIDS and therefore Maryland should ban same-sex marriage. The ignorance and irony of his comments escaped him.

“I’m not a ‘homo-phobiac’ nor a ‘xeno-phobiac.’ People who have special propensities can do what they will,” Delegate Emmett Burns said. “Same-sex marriage is bad for people of my church and bad for the state … I don’t want your protection … The law is that marriage is between a man and a WO-MAN,” he proclaimed. “You cannot protect our churches – you don’t know how. Gays and lesbians are protected because they can hide their sexual orientation – they are already protected,” adding, “Children are being used in this process. Children are being used for the purpose of same-sex marriage.”

Others who testified against marriage equality were professional gay-haters, like one Alliance Defense Fund attorney who quoted Aristotle, ironically, perhaps, not realizing that Aristotle was gay and praised same-sex unions.

But Delegate Simmons might have been the hero of the day. The Washington Post wrote that he “peppered a panel of religious leaders opposed to the bill with questions about the source of their opposition. Simmons suggested the only reasons were rooted in a desire to impose their religious beliefs on others.”

“I have heard no evidence at all how same-sex marriage effects your families, the church. . . . There’s not a syllable of evidence. You just don’t like it,” Simmons said.

Simmons also challenged another citizen who testified vehemently against marriage equality and claimed he was concerned about the future of “traditional marriage,” and worried because he believed the institution of marriage was in trouble.

“Last year we made divorce easier, did you come to testify against that?,” Simmons asked, receiving a squirming answer that meant “no.”

“We’ve had bills dealing with domestic violence, have you ever come to testify about them?,” Simmons continued. The respondent, stunningly, claimed he saw no relationship between domestic violence and preserving marriages.

Simmons also told a religious leader preaching biblical concepts against gay marriage, that he himself is a straight man, married 41 years, and said,  “[Gay] people who want to get married have a right to be left alone from people like you.”

Governor O’Malley, who had kicked off the heating at 1:10 PM, returned at 11:20 PM in time to hear the final comments. The hearing ended at 11:40 PM. It is unclear but a committee vote might take place as soon as Monday.

For additional reporting, read John Riley’s report at MetroWeekly,  and Lou Chibbaro Jr.’s report at The Washington Blade.

Image via Equality Maryland via Twitter.

There's a reason 10,000 people subscribe to NCRM. You can get the news before it breaks just by subscribing, plus you can learn something new every day.
Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

Why the Shutdown Is About to Get Even Worse

Published

on

As the federal government shutdown extends into its 27th day with no resolution in sight, no active talks between Democratic and Republican leaders, and President Donald Trump focused on his White House ballroom project while heading off to Asia, millions of Americans are bracing for mounting hardship.

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson kicked off the week with a press conference during which he blamed Democrats for the shutdown:

“Democrats are required to open the government. They keep saying, ‘Republicans are in charge of government.’ We aren’t!” Johnson alleged, despite Republicans having majorities in the House and Senate, and a Republican President in the White House.

READ MORE: ‘I Don’t Know—He Was Recommended’: Trump Struggles to Justify Latest Pardon

As of Saturday, about 40 million Americans on food stamps will see their benefits disappear. Also blaming Democrats, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has announced as of November 1 the “well has run dry” and it will not release any SNAP payments. This comes despite its own internal memo stating “congressional intent” and, some say, the law, requires billions in available emergency funds are to be used during a shutdown. Some experts and critics say this is another of the Republicans’ moves to try to pin the shutdown on Democrats and make them pay in public perception and in their pocketbooks.

According to Politico, the SNAP stoppage is just one of a half-dozen ways the shutdown is going to get even worse: “Popular programs that provide nutrition assistance, early childhood education and air service to rural communities are now among those about to run out of money.”

The USDA has told states if they pay out SNAP benefits the federal government will not reimburse them after the shutdown lifts.

Federal workers will not receive their paychecks the week, the first full paycheck loss of the shutdown. This means that air travelers likely will see longer security lines, and longer times on the runway as fewer TSA agents and air traffic controllers — working without pay — are expected to be on the job.

READ MORE: Dr. Oz Slammed After Saying Goal of Health Care System Is to Boost GDP by ‘Trillions’

Among the thousands of federal workers who will not be receiving their paychecks on Friday are House congressional staffers, although their bosses, by law, will be paid. Speaker Mike Johnson has ordered GOP members of Congress to stay in their home districts. The following week, unless the government reopens, Senate staffers also will not be paid.

With Republicans refusing to negotiate with Democrats on reinstating the Affordable Care Act subsidies, millions of Americans will learn on November 1 just how much their Obamacare premiums will rise. Some estimates are in the double digits, but many say those increases could be double or triple current rates.

At least tens of thousands of children enrolled in Head Start and other early childhood education programs — more than 130 programs — will see a loss of federal funding.

“Loss of federal funding means some teachers won’t get paid and some centers will close,” Politico noted.

Despite the $130 million “gift” reportedly from a Trump “friend” to help pay the troops, members of the U.S. military risk not being paid on Friday without Congress reopening the government — or President Donald Trump reallocating funds from elsewhere in the government, as he did earlier this month. Some experts say those moves are unlawful.

“Trump does plan to continue using other funding to cover military paychecks during the shutdown, according to two White House officials granted anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly,” Politico also reported.

All of this of course has an impact on the economy. When people don’t get paid they often stop spending. Some experts, including the White House, say the economy could be on the hook for a loss of about $15 billion in GDP losses each week.

Critics are blasting the President and Republicans.

“Donald Trump is literally dancing in Asia while 40 million people lose access to food. Disgusting,” remarked California Governor Gavin Newsom on Sunday.

“I guess cutting billions from SNAP in his Big Ugly Bill wasn’t enough for Trump. Now, he’s choosing —yes, this is a choice — to not give families the critical food assistance they need to feed their families,” commented U.S. Senator Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) on Sunday.

“The Trump Admin found $20 billion to bail out Argentina but refuses to tap into a $6 billion reserve fund to provide vital food assistance to 42 million Americans. They’re using food and hunger as leverage as they hold the government hostage. Sickening,” wrote U.S Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) on Monday.

READ MORE: ‘Pay to Play’: Trump Ballroom Donors List Draws Concern and Condemnation

Image via Reuters

Continue Reading

News

‘Unequivocally False’: USDA Slammed for Claim It Can’t Fund SNAP Benefits During Shutdown

Published

on

The U.S. Department of Agriculture says contingency funds cannot be used to pay SNAP benefits to about 42 million people, despite its own prior guidance that points to “Congressional intent.” The USDA also says that states that choose to cover those costs will not be reimbursed when the shutdown is lifted.

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program “has contingency funds that could cover about two-thirds of the shortfall, which Democrats and liberal-leaning groups are calling on the administration to tap,” Axios reported. “But the USDA issued a one-page memo Friday saying the fund is only for true emergencies ‘like hurricanes, tornadoes, and floods, that can come on quickly and without notice.'”

Axios also called Friday’s guidance “the latest salvo in a string of memos and legal opinions designed to pressure Democrats into approving a ‘clean CR,’ or continuing resolution, to fund the government.”

READ MORE: ‘I Don’t Know—He Was Recommended’: Trump Struggles to Justify Latest Pardon

Additionally, Axios reported, a Center for American Progress (CAP) analysis Thursday “argued Trump has a legal obligation to continue funding SNAP, and accused him of cruelty.”

“The Trump administration has spent the entire year endangering the food security of millions of Americans,” CAP’s analysis stated. “From terminating funding used to purchase food for schools and food banks to passing the largest cuts in SNAP history, the administration has made it clear that its goal is to take food away from hungry families—and that sentiment is extending to the USDA’s approach to the shutdown.”

But according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), a now-deleted USDA shutdown “Lapse of Funding” memo states that the General Counsel of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) “provided a letter to USDA” that states “there is a bona fide need to obligate benefits for October – the first month of the fiscal year – during or prior to the month of September,” which would guarantee that funds be available for SNAP benefits.

READ MORE: ‘Amateur Historian’ Mike Johnson Hails Trump’s Ballroom as ‘Greatest’ White House Upgrade

“In addition,” the memo stated, “Congressional intent is evident that SNAP’s operations should continue since the program has been provided with multi-year contingency funds that can be used for State Administrative Expenses to ensure that the State can also continue operations during a Federal Government shutdown.”

CBPP President Sharon Parrott, a former OMB official, said in a statement on Thursday that Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins’ “claim that the Trump Administration is unable to deliver November SNAP benefits during a shutdown is unequivocally false.”

“In fact,” Parrott said, “the Administration is legally required to use contingency reserves — billions of dollars that Congress provided for use when SNAP funding is inadequate that remain available during the shutdown — to fund November benefits for the 1 in 8 Americans who need SNAP to afford their grocery bill.”

READ MORE: Alabama Republican Ties School Enrollment Drop to ‘Dissatisfaction’ With LGBTQ Content

 

Image via Reuters 

Continue Reading

News

Alabama Republican Ties School Enrollment Drop to ‘Dissatisfaction’ With LGBTQ Content

Published

on

An Alabama state GOP lawmaker says expanding the current “Don’t Say Gay” law would stop the record drop in school enrollment.

State Rep. Mack Butler of Rainbow City has filed legislation to expand the “Don’t Say Gay” law, first passed in 2021, from K-5 classrooms to all public school grades, according to the Alabama Reflector:

“Butler said in an interview Wednesday the bill is meant to help public schools focus on educating students and claimed that the recent enrollment decline partially comes from parents who are unsatisfied with LGBTQ content in schools. Alabama public officials have not said that was a reason for the drop in the K-12 population.”

Rep. Butler added, “as you’re seeing with the decreased enrollment, and a lot of it’s the CHOOSE Act and the virtual school or home schooling, but there absolutely is a dissatisfaction with what we’re doing, and I see this as helping public education get them back to their actual core charge.”

READ MORE: Pentagon’s Acceptance of Anonymous $130M ‘Gift’ Tied to Trump’s ‘Friend’ Raises Red Flags

The “Don’t Say Gay” legislation would “prohibit classroom instruction or discussions related to gender identity or sexual orientation from being provided to public school students in prekindergarten through twelfth grade.”

It would “prohibit public preK-12 teachers and education employees from displaying a flag or insignia relating to sexual orientation or gender identity on school property,” and “prohibit public preK-12 teachers and education employees from referring to a student by pronouns inconsistent with the student’s biological sex at birth.”

The Reflector also reported that the “Alabama Legislature in the last five years has passed several laws targeting LGBTQ+ people, including the original ‘Don’t Say Gay’ law passed in 2021 and a ban on gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth the following year.”

According to BillTrack, Butler also has sponsored legislation prohibiting “schools and public libraries from presenting or sponsoring drag performances,” a bill requiring the Ten Commandments to be displayed in all public schools, a bill requiring the “broadcast of the Star-Spangled Banner” weekly, and several bills related to religious exemptions for vaccine requirements.

READ MORE: ‘Pay to Play’: Trump Ballroom Donors List Draws Concern and Condemnation

 

Image via Shutterstock

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.