Connect with us

Art Imitates Life In A Small Texas Town’s Fight Against ‘Sordid Lives’

Published

on

This past week I attended my first public meeting in my small town of Wimberley, Texas, where members of a local playhouse had petitioned to be heard by the board to voice their adamant opposition to a scheduled production of “Sordid Lives,” a dark comedy featuring a colorful family, including, “a beautiful gay man on a journey,” a “guitar playing ex-con singer,” a “former gay-bashing remorseful bartender,” and a ‘Tammy Wynette obsessed transvestite,” and set in a small Texas town, according to the playwright’s casting notes, which implore: “These people are real. Don’t play them as cartoons, please.”

I had no idea what to expect when I went in, and by the time I left I was laughing. The hypocrisy heard at the meeting at the Wimberley Players, despite a well written letter by artistic director John Hood on its website, was beyond all comprehension. The near comical moments in that room became a reflection of the material and characters in the play. Art does indeed imitate life.

Our local paper, The Wimberley View, had published an article about the controversy along with three angry letters from some of those opposing the play, by Del Shores, and calling it “offensive with utterly no redeeming value,” despite its multiple awards and having been turned into a film and a TV show. The ranting takes up an entire page and comes dangerously close to using anti-gay slurs. I’ll leave it up to you as to why three angry letters opposing and no supporting were printed.

After my 64-year old neighbor came to me with the paper today crying “censorship!” I had to go. I have no idea why someone would want to wear a meat dress or many other artistic expressions including some stage shows, but I’ll be the first one out the door to fight back when someone wants to repress their right to do so. It also didn’t hurt that I was living here with my boyfriend of two years, meeting people like Diana, a local transgender woman, and writing about the diversity in small Texas towns as the culture wars battle on in these places.

I grabbed the first seat right next to the door, and a few minutes later a very nervous man asked if the next seat was taken. I had noticed him in the sea of blue-hairs in the lobby earlier, and he had noticed me. I was obviously a safe bet to sit next to since I was sporting my Nashville T-shirt and head buzzed just like his. As he sat I agreed with him when he said being close to the door might be a good idea at this meeting. We didn’t speak otherwise, but I think the relief on our faces with the knowledge we would be seated together was all that was needed. We braced for the vitriol we knew would be coming.

Before the meeting even started the hypocrisy began to flow. The woman behind me — who throughout the meeting made clear her position, with comments and noises, she opposed the play and its perceived un-Christian values — was telling someone coming in the door she was going to bring the “booze to the next trip.” She mentioned she’d signed up for the wrong trip and bringing the booze would be necessary for this one. I have no idea where they were going, but I hope they have a designated driver.

The first thing asked to the crowd of over 100 was a show of hands as to who had actually read or seen the play. About 12 hands went up. A few others said they had seen the movie. There were over 40 people who had signed the petition in opposition to the show. I’m no math whiz, but I’m sure the majority of those in opposition had already stepped onto the hypocrisy train the moment they walked in. They clearly hadn’t even bothered to hear the story’s central message of acceptance of family and people. I was possibly one of very few in the room who had actually read the play, seen the play, seen the movie, and seen the show.

As the meeting went on people were slinging accusations of bigotry and zealotry as well as bringing up words like “values” and “our Christian conservative community.” Angered, hate filled arguments from a guy with a British accent and passionate pleas from a writer and teacher filled the time. The nervous guy next to me had to ask the women behind us to stop gossiping as other people were speaking because he couldn’t hear. One woman began crying and another kept a list of peoples’ names and whether or not they agreed with her, giving a deep “tut-tut” to those who changed from her side to the other and marking it on her notepad.

The high point of the hypocrisy came when those opposed were accused of censorship rose up claiming they were only concerned for the community. After someone from the exact same community got up and spoke against them they actually interrupted the proceedings to ask why members of the community were being allowed to speak at all since they were not members of the theater. What censorship?

I was finally brought to laugh out loud, to my embarrassment, when one woman stated she had seen the movie and she didn’t like the way it depicted the people of Texas. It is set in a small Texas town just like ours. It was demeaning to her. She was perfectly happy, however, with the reality that they were all in that room speaking hate, hypocrisy, intolerance, and judgement. Thankfully, they were clearly in the minority and many others, including people of faith in this town, stood up to remind them of that.

To the people of my small, Texas community and the countless other towns in this country just like it, I say this. I’ve lived here for close to six years. I’ve worked in about 800 homes in the Wimberley area to help out with my family’s cleaning business in years past. I’ve seen what’s under your beds you forgot you left there. I’ve dealt with you when you were drunk and needed a ride to the local AA meeting. I’ve smelled the marijuana drifting over to my cottage when you didn’t know I knew what it smelled like. I could write a play about some of the people I’ve met in this wonderful, crazy little town that would make you try to censor me, too. You’re no different than all the cities you listed as being below your “standards.” You have your fair share of sordid lives. I promise you that.

This play, along with many other productions, depicts a truly different and diverse group of people just like the group I sat with this past week. It is hilarious, but it’s not for everyone. If you don’t like it, don’t go see it. But the moment you try to stop others from being able to see it is the moment you yourself more closely reflect the misguided characters you disagree with. You have given up on your belief in the bonds of family, acceptance, and individual freedom. That is far more detrimental to our community than any play we could put on.

 

Guest author Jeremy Stubbs credits his parents for his twisted sense of humor. He currently lives just outside of Austin, Texas with his wonderful partner and their pesky cat. When he’s not working to pay the bills he is photographing and writing about the world around him. Three days ago Stubbs created a Facebook group to support “the free expression of art” at the Wimberley Players theater. As of this writing it has attracted 560 members.

There's a reason 10,000 people subscribe to NCRM. You can get the news before it breaks just by subscribing, plus you can learn something new every day.
Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

‘He Sued to Block Kids From Getting SNAP’: Trump Torched for Biblical Defense of Children

Published

10 hours ago

on

November 13, 2025

By

President Donald Trump came under fire on Thursday after using the Bible to call for protecting children during an event with First Lady Melania Trump.

The event, an executive order signing, was “aimed at expanding opportunities for education, career development, housing, and other resources for young people transitioning from foster care to adulthood,” according to the White House.

“The Bible tells us that one of the measures of any society is how it cares for vulnerable children and orphans,” President Trump told the assembled audience in the East Room of the White House.

“So important, it is so big in the Bible, so, as we make America great again, we are going to protect American children in foster care.”

READ MORE: ‘Concepts of a Plan’: White House and GOP Under Fire for Health Care Cost Crisis

Critics were quick to chastise the president, whose administration has been fighting all the way to the Supreme Court to block funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

“You literally fought in court to strip families of food assistance,” declared California Governor Gavin Newsom.

“Your ICE agents pepper sprayed a baby last week,” charged House Homeland Security Committee Democrats.

“He sued to block kids from getting SNAP benefits just days ago,” wrote The Lincoln Project.

The Friendly Atheist’s Hemant Mehta posted a headline that read: “USAID cuts may lead to more than 14 million deaths globally, including 4.5 million children under 5 by 2030, researchers say.”

READ MORE: Trump Stumbles Over ‘God Bless America’ Lyrics at Veterans Day Ceremony

 

Image via Reuters 

 

Continue Reading

News

‘Concepts of a Plan’: White House and GOP Under Fire for Health Care Cost Crisis

Published

11 hours ago

on

November 13, 2025

By

It took congressional Democrats more than a year of work — plus several years of prior policy development — to create the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. Now, Republicans are scrambling to fix it after passing President Donald Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill,” which stripped away the subsidies that helped make buying insurance on the exchanges affordable.

And they have just weeks to make it happen, before the new premiums go into effect on January 1.

The House is back in session after Speaker Mike Johnson kept Republicans in their home districts for almost two months during the federal government shutdown. Now, Republicans and the Trump White House are starting to decide what, if anything, they will do to keep premiums — already published — from doubling or even tripling in certain cases.

“President Donald Trump’s Domestic Policy Council and senior health officials have been meeting privately for preliminary conversations on how to address the expiration of health insurance tax credits, according to a White House official and another person familiar with the talks,” Politico reported on Thursday. “Conversations about a White House alternative to Affordable Care Act subsidies, which will expire at year’s end, are in the ‘early ideation phase,’ said a third person familiar with the talks.”

READ MORE: Congressman Conway? Top Trump Critic Reportedly Eyeing House Bid

Capitol Hill is in a similar state.

Noting that “the clock is ticking,” NBC News reported that “Republicans, under pressure from Democrats after the government shutdown revived the health care clash, have not coalesced around legislation or even an abstract idea, and are only now starting serious discussions about putting proposals together.”

“As the party scrambles to craft an alternative, multiple Republicans are vying for Trump’s endorsement of ideas that could alleviate skyrocketing costs that are just around the corner,” NBC added.

Democrats want a three-year extension of Obamacare subsidies and tax credits, Speaker Johnson has said that is a nonstarter.

Some Republicans are starting to speak out.

READ MORE: ‘Out of Touch’: Eric Trump Blasted for $500 Million Bitcoin Brag

U.S. Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-NJ), a former Democrat, “warned, ‘not only is it morally bankrupt, it’s political suicide’ for Republicans to let the subsidies expire without an alternative in place.”

U.S. Senator Rick Scott (R-FL) prefers a vehicle like health care saving accounts that he claimed will lower costs by driving up competition. President Trump appeared to favor that approach, when he attacked health insurance companies in a social media post earlier this week.

Some are warning that bypassing the Obamacare exchanges could damage or destroy them.

“A tweet is not a health care plan,” Larry Levitt, executive vice president for health policy at KFF, told NBC. “If people could use these Trump health care dollars to buy insurance not regulated by the ACA, it would likely cause the ACA to collapse and upend protections for pre-existing conditions.”

Meanwhile, critics are blasting Republicans on Capitol Hill as well as the Trump administration for waiting so long before starting to try to create a plan.

Responding to the NBC News report, journalist Justin Baragona observed, “we’re still on ‘concepts of a plan’ here.”

“They’ve had 10+ years to work on this and have nothing,” wrote Laura Belin, a reporter for a progressive website. “Time to stop taking their supposed health care policy work seriously.”

“The White House is in ‘early ideation’ phase on ACA subsidies,” wrote The Bulwark’s Jonathan Cohn. “An issue already hitting millions of insurance buyers And that Democrats (not to mention analysts, journalists etc) have been saying needs attention for more than a year.”

Michigan Democratic State Senate Majority Whip Mallory McMorrow, a candidate for the U.S. Senate, wrote: “After Republicans refused to extend ACA subsidies, 4 Michigan insurers are dropping out of the ACA marketplace altogether. That’s 200,000 Michiganders who just lost their plans. Others are just going to cancel their plans. Which means more uncompensated care. Which means *everyone’s* healthcare costs will be higher.”

READ MORE: Trump Stumbles Over ‘God Bless America’ Lyrics at Veterans Day Ceremony

 

Image via Reuters 

Continue Reading

News

Congressman Conway? Top Trump Critic Reportedly Eyeing House Bid

Published

14 hours ago

on

November 13, 2025

By

George Conway, the prominent attorney, Trump critic, and ex-husband of former Trump White House senior counselor Kellyanne Conway, may be considering a run for Congress.

According to a report at CNN and a post by New York Times congressional correspondent Annie Karni, Conway is eyeing a run for retiring Democratic U.S. Rep. Jerry Nadler’s New York district.

CNN reported that Conway, 62, is “actively considering running for Congress from New York City, a source familiar with the matter tells CNN.”

Karni reported, “the Conway pitch being — what the House will need next year is an aggressive lawyer with an investigative background just going after Trump.”

READ MORE: Melania Trump to Appear With President as Epstein Files Take Center Stage

Conway is a former Republican who became an independent in 2018. He has a law degree from Yale, and successfully argued a case before the U.S. Supreme Court, obtaining a unanimous ruling. He is a co-founder of The Lincoln Project and currently co-hosts a podcast at The Bulwark.

Should Democrats retake the majority in the House of Representatives, it’s likely there will be numerous investigations into President Donald Trump and his administration — not to mention possible efforts to impeach the unpopular and controversial Commander in Chief.

Conway would have good company in a primary.

“Jack Schlossberg, former President John F. Kennedy’s grandson, entered the race this week,” CNN noted.

The Daily Beast adds that “much of the buzz around Conway stems from his personal life. While he and his 58-year-old ex-wife, Kellyanne, tried to make their marriage work amid his dramatic political realignment, the couple frequently made headlines. As Kellyanne served as senior counselor to Trump from 2017 to 2020, her husband routinely sounded off on her boss and advisers—including Stephen Miller, whom Kellyanne referred to as one of her ‘best friends’ in the current administration earlier this month.”

READ MORE: White House Eyes Major Blitz as GOP Voters Blame Trump for Failing Economy

 

Image by Presia Debauch via Flickr and a CC license

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.