Connect with us

Texas GOP Congressional Race Devolves Into Full-Fledged Anti-Gay Hatefest

Published

on

Attack Ad Calls The New Civil Rights Movement Part of ‘Radical Gay Lobby’

A Republican congressional candidate in West Texas is airing a TV ad accusing one of his opponents of secretly being a “gay rights advocate” because he participated in military LGBT Pride runs while serving as a base Air Force commander.

Earlier this month, we told you how retired Col. Michael Bob Starr, a GOP candidate in Congressional District 19, had come under fire for participating in the runs while leading the 7th Bomb Wing at Dyess Air Force Base in Abilene.

RELATED: Congressional Candidate, Decorated Officer Attacked For Participating In Air Force Gay Pride Run

Oil field worker Jason Corley, one of eight candidates in the race to replace right-wing Rep. Randy Neugebauer, accused Starr — a decorated officer — of promoting “social engineering” in the military by participating in the runs sponsored by Dyess AFB’s Pride Alliance in 2014 and 2015, following the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.

Now, Lubbock Mayor Glen Robertson — another candidate in the race — has taken the attack a step further with a TV ad alleging that Starr is somehow supported by “the radical gay lobby.”

1a.jpg 

“Michael Bob Starr says he’s a conservative values candidate, but Starr supported, promoted and participated in gay Pride events, wore rainbow-colored gay Pride clothing and is being called a gay-rights activist,” the ad’s narrator states. “And liberal gay rights organizations are supporting Starr, the same radical groups who want men to be able to use women’s bathrooms. Michael Bob Starr, supported by the radical gay lobby, wrong for West Texas.”

Interestingly, Robertson himself could be accused of supporting gay rights, given that he once told The Lubbock Avalanche-Journal that he would be open to the possibility of an LGBT nondiscrimination ordinance:

“If anybody brought that issue forward, I’d be open-minded and look at it,” Robertson said. 

The allegations in Robertson’s ad are based on articles by Breitbart Texas’ Brandon Darby, an FBI informant who somehow believes that because LGBT news outlets including this one have covered the anti-gay attacks against Starr, they are supporting him:

In another strange twist, one group, The New Civil Rights Movement (NCRM), which calls itself a “broadly cited media organization delivering news and opinion dedicated to the wide interests of the progressive and LGBT communities,” found itself defending and advocating for a candidate who, only days prior, attempted to convince his fellow West Texans that he was actually the anti-gay agenda candidate.

Although we certainly appreciate the free publicity, Darby’s premise is way off. He’s effectively arguing that any news outlet that covers a political candidate supports that candidate. In other words, by reporting on Bob Starr – or Hillary Clinton, or Bernie Sanders, or Donald Trump, or Marco Rubio – any news outlet, including NCRM, supports those candidates, which is obviously false. 

But this is not particularly surprising from Darby, reportedly a one-time radical “leftist” who infamously became an FBI informant, ratting out two of his fellow activists and sending them to prison.

RELATED: Air Force Colonel Calls GOP Primary Opponent A ‘Coward’ For Anti-Gay Attack

Besides, from a gay rights standpoint, Starr’s response to the attacks has been almost as bad as the attacks themselves, and he certainly wouldn’t merit the support of any LGBT group, let alone a radical one:

“Glen knows that I’ve never been a gay rights advocate,“ Starr responded. “I believe, and have always believed, that homosexual behavior is immoral. I do not support same-sex marriage. I believe the definition of marriage is older than the law or any government, and is defined as a holy union between a man and a woman. I already made this clear when these reports first surfaced.

“I am the only candidate with firsthand knowledge of what the liberals have done to the military with their social experimentation,” Starr stated. “Military policy should be based on one thing and one thing alone – how could we be more effective in protecting our nation and our national security interests.”

Watch Robertson’s ad here: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XUpWufp2Mc 

There's a reason 10,000 people subscribe to NCRM. You can get the news before it breaks just by subscribing, plus you can learn something new every day.
Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

Supreme Court Signals ‘Likely’ Defeat Ahead for Trump: Report

Published

on

The U.S. Supreme Court appears poised to hand President Donald Trump a defeat in a closely watched case that could decide the future of mail-in voting, including not only whether states can count ballots after Election Day, but also before — putting at risk early and absentee voting.

The Trump Department of Justice and the Republican National Committee argued before the high court that Mississippi should not be able to count mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day but received up to five days later,” Politico reported.

The conservative attorneys insisted that they were not trying to eliminate early voting.

“We agree with both sides that early voting is still acceptable,” U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer told the court. “There could be a process where ballots are being received earlier, but that ballot box has to close on Election Day.”

READ MORE: ‘Near Collapse’: US Aviation ‘Teetering on the Brink of Failure’ Report Says

Chief Justice John Roberts appeared to suggest that Sauer’s deadline was arbitrary.

“I’m not sure I understand how that point is responsive to the point that if the Election Day is the voting and taking that it has to be that day,” Roberts said. “Maybe you’re not saying anything other than, well, that’s different.”

“It’s a challenging question,” Sauer acknowledged.

Conservative Justice Samuel Alito appeared most concerned with the concept of counting ballots before and after Election Day, giving “the most voice to concerns President Donald Trump has repeatedly aired and amplified about public suspicion driven by vote tallies potentially being swayed by late-arriving ballots,” Politico noted.

“We are moving in this direction: We don’t have Election Day any more,” Alito said. “We have election month or we have election months, early voting can start a month before the election. The ballot can be received a month after the election.”

Citing amicus briefs, Alito expressed concern, saying that “confidence in election outcomes can be seriously undermined if the apparent outcome of the election on the day after the polls close is radically flipped by the acceptance later of a big stash of ballots that flip the election.”

Politico’s Josh Gerstein commented that the Supreme Court seems “likely to deliver a defeat to Trump and rule states can count ballots received after Election Day, with Roberts, Barrett and maybe Kavanaugh joining the liberals.”

READ MORE: Trump Makes New Threat After Telling ICE ‘No Masks’ at Airports

 

Image via Reuters 

 

 

 

Continue Reading

News

‘Near Collapse’: US Aviation ‘Teetering on the Brink of Failure’ Report Says

Published

on

The American aviation system seems to be “near collapse,” amid fatal crashes, crumbling airports, stressed-out air traffic controllers — and the latest sign: hours-long TSA security lines, according to a report in The Atlantic.

The most recent fatal airline crash came Sunday evening when an Air Canada Express jet collided with a fire truck at New York’s LaGuardia Airport. Two pilots were killed and dozens of passengers were injured. The airport has been closed since, though it is expected to reopen Monday afternoon.

“A closure at LaGuardia puts pressure on other airports in the area, and they might not be prepared to handle any redirects,” The Atlantic noted. “This morning, reports of smoke in the air-traffic-control tower at Newark Liberty International Airport, just across the Hudson River from New York City, caused a brief ground stop. Officials determined the problem was a burning smell in an elevator and reopened the tower, but this is only the latest sign of how broken Newark airport is.”

There are other examples of a system in crisis.

“Last week, an Alaska Airlines plane nearly crashed into a FedEx plane on a runway at Newark, missing by just 300 to 325 feet, after pilots were instructed to avoid a collision. And earlier this month, a Singapore Airlines plane clipped the wing of a Spirit Airlines jet while pushing back from a gate. Last spring, air-traffic controllers lost the ability to track planes at Newark for two brief intervals, causing such stress that some of them took leave.”

READ MORE: ‘Down There With the Titanic’: Fetterman Has Historic Polling Swing Says Analyst

Describing a system that is “quietly eroding from within,” The Atlantic’s David A. Graham blames “years of disinvestment capped by political dysfunction.”

Graham also pointed to the FAA’s abrupt closure of the El Paso, Texas airport recently amid a standoff with the Department of Defense. And last January’s collision of an Army helicopter with an American Airlines jet — which President Trump quickly blamed on “DEI.”

Trump has now deployed ICE agents to at least a dozen airports across the country, purportedly to assist TSA agents, who have not been paid since Valentine’s Day as a partial government shutdown lingers and Trump refuses a bipartisan plan to quickly fund all DHS agencies except ICE.

Agents’ numbers are dwindling as call-outs increase over the weeks-long crisis.

Graham calls Trump deploying ICE agents to airports “a particularly extreme example of what the political scientist Steven M. Teles has dubbed ‘kludgeocracy,’ in which the government reaches for short-term, improvised solutions while resisting real reform.”

Should his deployment of ICE agents not work, the president has another solution: if ICE is not sufficient at the airports, he says he will “bring in the National Guard.”

READ MORE: Trump Official Says He Teleported 50 Miles to a Waffle House

 

Image via Reuters

Continue Reading

News

Trump Makes New Threat After Telling ICE ‘No Masks’ at Airports

Published

on

President Donald Trump, who has refused to order his ICE agents to stop wearing masks on America’s streets, is asking them to not wear masks while being deployed at America’s airports, amid a TSA crisis critics are now blaming him for. But the president is now threatening that if ICE is not sufficient at the airports, he will “bring in the National Guard.”

Saying he is a “big proponent” of ICE wearing masks while doing their work, he said, dealing with “hardened criminals,” Trump said he would “greatly appreciate” no masks at the airports.

Some noted that the masks supposedly are to prevent ICE agents from being doxxed — having their photos taken and their identities revealed. This move would effectively allow them to be photographed.

“Trump appears sensitive to the optics of masked ICE agents in airports,” wrote Politico senior legal affairs correspondent Kyle Cheney. “This is notable as a legal matter because DHS has argued in court (though judges are skeptical) that the mask policy is optional for each agent to decide based on personal/local safety concern.”

Trump also said that ICE “loves” that they will be able to arrest undocumented immigrants at the airports.

Some critics noted that Trump’s statement was a request, not an order.

Journalist Sophia A. Nelson called the no masks move “Progress.”

READ MORE: Trump Official Says He Teleported 50 Miles to a Waffle House

 

Image via Reuters

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.