Connect with us

GOP US Senator Introduces Anti-Gay Pro-Discrimination ‘Religious Freedom’ Amendment

Published

on

U.S. Senator James Inhofe has just introduced a federal version of the anti-gay laws currently flooding state legislatures.

U.S. Senator James Inhofe is known for being virulently anti-gay, and the world’s greatest climate change denier. Today, with the GOP holding a majority in both the House and the Senate, Inhofe is ironically the Chairman of the United States Senate Committee on Environment, which gives him a large measure of control over the government’s ability to fight climate change – or to not.

In his role as a same-sex marriage opponent, Senator Inhofe hails from the great state of Oklahoma, where state anti-gay lawmakers like Joseph Silk have been making national headlines.

Back in 2006 (photos above and below), as the Senate was debating adding an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would ban same-sex marriage, Inhofe stood in front of a huge photo of his entire family and infamously uttered these words:

inhofe_family.jpg

“My wife and I have been married 47 years. We have 20 kids and grandkids. I’m really proud to say that in the recorded history of our family, we’ve never had a divorce or any kind of homosexual relationship.”

You can actually watch him make that embarrassing declaration in the C-SPAN video at the top, starting at about the 8 minute mark.

Yesterday, Senator Inhofe joined the ranks of those who claim to be oppressed, or fear being oppressed, for merely living by their deeply held religious beliefs – to be anti-gay and to discriminate against LGBT people.

Inhofe introduced a federal version of a bill currently making its way around state legislatures, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The state versions mandate that no person or business shall be forced to serve anyone, as long as they can claim that doing so would violate their sincerely held religious beliefs. 

Pharmacists who don’t want to issue contraception or HIV/AIDS medication? Covered. EMTs who don’t wish to help gay heart attack victims? Covered. Insurance sales agents who don’t wish to sell policies that include abortion coverage? Covered. And of course, bakers and florists who don’t wish to work with same-sex couples who are marrying? Covered.

Inhofe’s Amendment 381 “would seek to prevent the federal government from discriminating against individuals, businesses, or organizations based on their sincerely held religious beliefs regarding abortion or marriage.”

In a statement, the Oklahoma Senator attacked President Barack Obama as he positioned himself as a religious freedom savior.

“Under policies enacted by the Obama Administration, many religious organizations and individuals have grown concerned that they will be discriminated against by the federal government based on their religious beliefs,” Inhofe said in a statement on his website. “We watched this play out in the Hobby Lobby case, where the Obama Administration used its healthcare law to write a new moral code by telling David Green that he could not apply his faith conviction of when life begins to how he operates a private business. Thankfully, Hobby Lobby won their case in the Supreme Court and religious liberty was preserved, but this is not the end to the assault. My amendment helps to protect the constitutional right for an individual, business, or organization to peacefully and freely adhere to their religious beliefs.”

Inhofe’s amendment would be attached to the current Senate Budget Resolution, if it passes.

 

Image: Screenshot via C-SPAN
Hat tip: Justin Snow at MetroWeekly

 

There's a reason 10,000 people subscribe to NCRM. You can get the news before it breaks just by subscribing, plus you can learn something new every day.
Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

GOP Senator Demands TSA Funding—Then Blocks Bill Funding TSA

Published

on

A Republican senator who has almost daily has been demanding funding for the Transportation Security Administration on Wednesday blocked Democratic legislation that would fund the TSA — and other Homeland Security agencies such as FEMA and the Coast Guard — but not Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

“Daily reminder that Democrats blocked funding for HOMELAND SECURITY including the Coast Guard, Secret Service, and TSA,” U.S. Senator Katie Britt (R-AL) wrote on Wednesday morning, as she has done almost daily for the past several weeks.

In her posts, Britt notes that “ICE and CBP are still funded and will continue to deport criminal illegal aliens.”

But on the Senate floor on Wednesday afternoon, Senator Britt said that the Democrats’ bill she blocked would “defund” the two agencies she regularly notes are “still funded.”

READ MORE: Trump Slammed for Trip Targeting Republican Who Backed Epstein Files Release

“We have political games being played by our Democratic colleagues instead of putting the people of this nation first,” Britt declared. She called the bill, by U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), legislation that “would effectively defund our law enforcement officers that are charged with keeping Americans safe.”

“It would also defund our border patrol, our customs protection,” she said — the very agencies she states are still funded.

“Look, we’re not going back to the era of ‘defund police,'” Britt insisted.

Senator Murray, lamenting her bill being stalled, wrote: “Senate Republicans just blocked my bill to fund TSA and FEMA… AGAIN. This isn’t complicated: if Republicans won’t agree to rein in ICE & CBP, they should AT MINIMUM work with us to fund TSA. But they won’t.”

According to The Hill, Murray called the idea that her bill would “defund” CBP or Homeland Security investigations “absurd.”

READ MORE: How Trump’s ‘Delusional Faith in Himself’ Drove His Decision to Wage War: Columnist

“All the bill I just offered does is fund the rest of DHS while talks continue on ICE and Border Patrol, and the simple fact is Republicans have already funded these agencies when they gave them more money, than most militaries by the way, in their Big Ugly Bill,” she said.

Attorney and immigration policy expert Andrea R. Flores wrote, “The defund argument just doesn’t make sense after Congress already gave ICE and Border Patrol $170 billion, which means they are at zero risk of stopping any of their core security functions any time soon.”

Pablo Manríquez, editor of Migrant Insider, mocked the Alabama GOP lawmaker: “Britt blocked TSA funding after complaining all month that TSA needs funding,” he wrote.

READ MORE: How Trump Fumbled What Should Be a ‘Rally Around the Flag’ Time in America: Columnist

 

Image via Reuters 

Continue Reading

News

Trump Slammed for Trip Targeting Republican Who Backed Epstein Files Release

Published

on

President Donald Trump is coming under fire for traveling to Kentucky on Wednesday, where he has endorsed a primary challenger against the Republican congressman who co-sponsored legislation to release the Epstein files.

“The Republican Party’s Worst ‘Congressman,’ EVER, Thomas Massie, is attacking GREAT Navy Seal Hero, Ed Gallrein, who is running against him in the Primary,” Trump wrote on Wednesday before heading off to the Bluegrass State.

He called Rep. Massie a “misfit” and a “complete and total disaster as a Congressman, and a Human Being,” who is “disloyal to the Republican Party, the People of Kentucky and, most importantly, he is disloyal to the United States of America!”

The Lincoln Project blasted the president, writing: “Trump’s rushing to Kentucky today. He’s not there to honor the soldier from KY lost in his foolish war, nor address Kentuckians concerns on affordability. He’s there to help primary a Republican who pushed for the Epstein Files’ release.”

READ MORE: How Trump’s ‘Delusional Faith in Himself’ Drove His Decision to Wage War: Columnist

The New York Post characterized Trump’s trip as the president taking “his war” against his “congressional nemesis” straight to Kentucky.

On Tuesday, Massie charged: “They’re paying to bus people to the Trump event in my Congressional District. What they’ll discover is Trump fans in KY-4 and across the entire Commonwealth also support my work on the Epstein files, reigning in spending, ending forever wars, draining the swamp, and food freedom!”

Also on Tuesday, former U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) mocked Trump’s endorsement of Gallrein.

“This is honestly one of the worst things I have ever seen,” she wrote, calling Gallrein, “one of the biggest Trump haters in Kentucky.”

“Boy I bet Ed Gallrein really hates all the sweet people that wore MAGA hats all these years,” Greene added. She also said that Trump’s supporters are “so freaking brainwashed by all the 24-7 BS propaganda on Fox News that they aren’t capable of seeing how much these people hate them.”

READ MORE: How Trump Fumbled What Should Be a ‘Rally Around the Flag’ Time in America: Columnist

Continue Reading

News

How Trump Fumbled What Should Be a ‘Rally Around the Flag’ Time in America: Columnist

Published

on

The nation is at war. It’s our 250th anniversary. We just had historic performances at the Olympics.

“In normal times, each would summon national pride and unity,” writes The Washington Post‘s Theodore R. Johnson.

That “they’re happening together — the rally-around-the-flag effect should be supercharged,” he says. “It’s not.”

While President Donald Trump calls this “the golden age of America,” Americans aren’t feeling it.

But “when the crisis isn’t presented to the public; there’s little bipartisan support; the White House spins the events poorly,” the rally-around-the-flag effect lessens.

“The effect was Trump’s for the taking, and the administration fumbled it,” Johnson observes.

“American optimism has slumped to a record low, and 60 percent of the country thinks we’re on the wrong track,” he writes. “A Pew study published March 5 found that the U.S. is the only country among 25 surveyed where more adults view their fellow citizens as morally bad than good. And the military strikes against Venezuela and Iran have produced no customary bump in approval ratings for the president.”

Why?

READ MORE: How Trump’s ‘Delusional Faith in Himself’ Drove His Decision to Wage War: Columnist

Trump has put his name — and imprint — on “many of the nation’s institutions and symbols,” including the Kennedy Center and the Institute of Peace. He’s planning a 250th anniversary celebration with a UFC fight night at the White House on his birthday. And MAGA has changed what “patriot” used to mean.

“Meanwhile, the president has called Democratic lawmakers ‘traitors’ and labeled them adversaries in a ‘war from within.”

Johnson says that these are “not accidents of polarization. They are products of a president who uses the bully pulpit to keep the country at odds.”

He concludes, “The United States can win wars, celebrate gold and commemorate the nation’s founding, but if its president and politics reap rewards by sowing division, Americans are more likely to rally to the party’s pennant than around the nation’s flag.”

READ MORE: ‘Looking to Throw in the Towel?’: Trump Mocked as Administration Again Switches Priorities

 

Image via Reuters

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.