Connect with us

Breaking: 10th Circuit Slaps Down State Of Kansas On Marriage

Published

on

The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals today just slapped down the State of Kansas in a pivotal marriage case.

Early last month a federal judge struck down a same-sex marriage ban in Kansas, and GOP Governor Sam Brownback (photo) and his administration have been fighting the ruling ever since.

After the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review any same-sex marriage cases on October 6, that should have made clear to all states in the nation that their bans on same-sex marriage would soon be coming down – and they might as well just stop wasting taxpayer dollars defending them – but Gov. Brownback, a staunch religious theocrat has refused.

After the SCOTUS move, Brownback declared, “I swore an oath to support the Constitution of the State of Kansas. An overwhelming majority of Kansas voters amended the Constitution to include a definition of marriage as one man and one woman. Activist judges should not overrule the people of Kansas.” 

He’s still fighting.

The U.S. Supreme Court dropped a short, temporary stay last month, allowing same-sex couples in Kansas to marry. 

But Kansas is still fighting (with taxpayer dollars) and recently asked the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals for an en banc hearing on the case.

An en banc hearing is one where all the judges in the Court sit and hear the case.

The 10th Circuit just gloriously refused.

No judge in regular active service on the Court requested that the Court be polled on the motion for initial hearing en banc,” the Court’s response today reads. “As a result, Appellants’ motion for an initial hearing en banc is denied.”

Not only was the response a “no,” it was in essence a “hell no!”

Not only would the court not hear the case en banc, not a single judge even thought the case warranted asking their colleagues if they should perhaps consider it.

Expect Gov. Brownback to continue his quest to stop same-sex marriage in Kansas.

What would Dorothy say?

 

Image via Flickr

Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

‘Most Economists Don’t Agree With Us’ Admits Trump Trade Chief as Costs Climb

Published

on

Peter Navarro, President Donald Trump’s top trade official and the architect of his massively unpopular trade war and sweeping tariff plans, admits that the majority of economists do not agree with the administration’s stance that tariffs are actually “tax cuts.”

Tariffs are taxes paid by importers on goods and services as they enter the country, and those costs often make their way to consumers through higher prices. While some businesses initially absorbed the added expense when President Trump’s tariffs began, July’s wholesale prices jumped 0.9% — more than four times the 0.2% economists expected and the largest monthly increase in over three years — signaling that consumers will be bearing more of the burden.

Not according to Navarro, the Senior Counselor to the President for Trade and Manufacturing who was sentenced to prison for contempt of Congress after the first Trump administration.

“No tariffs, no tax cuts,” Navarro told CNBC on Thursday (video below), referring to the massive tax cut package— central to President Trump’s so-called “One Big Beautiful Bill”—that the administration claims will be partly offset by collected tariff revenue.

READ MORE: Inflation ‘Starting to Boil’: Dire Economic News for Trump — Worst in Three Years

“Are tariffs price hikes or tax cuts?” Navarro posed. “I say they’re tax cuts.”

“I mean, many, many economists would say that they’re tax hikes,” the CNBC host replied, “because ultimately, a consumer will pay for some of those increased prices.”

“Look,” a frustrated Navarro responded, “that debate has been going on since the first [Trump] term, and most economists just don’t agree with us.”

“The problem with most economists is they got it wrong the first time around, just, spectacularly wrong. So, who has credibility here? The Trump administration, or the economists?”

The CNBC host continued, saying, “we’re hearing from retail companies about passing on higher prices to the consumer. Who do you see is paying for all of these tariffs that are coming in? I mean, it’s either the people who buy the stuff, the people who make the stuff, or the people who sell the stuff.”

Navarro was quick to respond.

READ MORE: Trump Melts Down Over Elizabeth Warren’s Accusations

“It’s the foreigners, the exporters who are heavily dependent on this market, and we see this clearly in the data,” he claimed, contrary to multiple reports that show importers and retailers are increasingly passing on the tariff costs to consumers.

“We’ve collected over $100 billion in tariffs already,” he continued. “We’ve had zero inflation from that.”

Experts disagree.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has said Trump’s tariffs will add about four-tenths of a point onto inflation, according to Reuters. Wholesale prices in July spiked 0.9%, far higher than expected.

Watch the video below or at this link.

READ MORE: Dr. Oz: God Gave Medicaid Users a Desire to ‘Change the World’—Not Watch TV

Continue Reading

News

Dr. Oz: God Gave Medicaid Users a Desire to ‘Change the World’—Not Watch TV

Published

on

Dr. Mehmet Oz, Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, disparaged “able-bodied” Medicaid recipients, alleging they spend hours each day watching television or engaging in other “leisure-time” activities instead of pursuing what he called their God-given desire to change the world. He asked why anyone would question the government would not want to get people to be wealthy.

The vast majority of “able-bodied” people who use Medicaid, a government safety net medical insurance program that does not provide income to recipients, are already working at least one job. In the majority of families that use Medicaid, at least one adult is working a full-time job. The majority of Medicaid users are children, people living with disabilities, or the elderly, who are unable to work.

“You want people to actually get out of their homes and go do things,” Administrator Oz told CNBC on Thursday (video below). “An able-bodied person on Medicaid today watches about 6.1 hours of television, or just hangs out — leisure time.”

READ MORE: Inflation ‘Starting to Boil’: Dire Economic News for Trump — Worst in Three Years

“That’s a lot of time,” Oz insisted, claiming his data is sound.

“No one’s gonna be happy sitting at home 6.1 hours a day doing nothing,” he insisted.

“Your desire to go out and do something, to change the world, is given to you by God, the moment you’re born,” Oz proclaimed. “We want people to go out there and live their fullest lives, so asking people to go out and either volunteer at a position, get educated, get engaged with your community, or go get a job, and we’re gonna help you do that.”

Complaining about critics, some of whom say the new work requirements are counter-productive or designed to kick people out of Medicaid, Oz retorted, “I don’t understand how you could possibly say, that’s a bad thing for America, for us, not to want to get people to be wealthy, to go out there and change their own lives for the better.”

Last month, Dr. Oz declared that the Trump administration will no longer “tolerate” what he called a culture that makes it “easy to be sick in America.” Framing childhood illness as a failure of parenting and physical activity rather than medical need, Oz linked obesity to national security and warned that industries would be forced to cooperate—or face government retaliation.

Critics blasted Dr. Oz’s remarks.

READ MORE: Trump Melts Down Over Elizabeth Warren’s Accusations

“So the ‘earnest effort to save Medicaid’ is shaming low-income Americans for watching TV, coming from the guy who made his millions off of people watching his shows,” noted Wall Street investment banker Evaristus Odinikaeze.

“This is pure class prejudice,” Odinikaeze charged. “The reality he ignores is that many Medicaid recipients are working poor, disabled, or caretakers, not lounging all day. Access to care keeps people healthy enough to work, care for family, and live with dignity. And cutting Medicaid isn’t about ‘saving’ it; it’s about gutting it so tax breaks for the wealthy can keep flowing.”

Watch the video below or at this link.

READ MORE: Trump’s Kennedy Center Remarks Veer Into Grievances, False Claims, and Lessons on Grass

 

Image via Reuters 

Continue Reading

News

Inflation ‘Starting to Boil’: Dire Economic News for Trump — Worst in Three Years

Published

on

Lowering inflation and reducing the cost of living were central to Donald Trump’s election. But polls now show Americans believe he’s failing on both fronts—and his approval rating on the issue is sinking fast.

CNN analyst Harry Enten on Wednesday warned, “This is an abject disaster for the President of the United States.”

“He’s 25 points underwater” on inflation, Enten told viewers. “My goodness gracious, that is where The Little Mermaid is, and he is matching The Little Mermaid. That’s how far underwater he is on the issue that got him elected.”

Thursday morning the tea leaves got worse for President Trump.

READ MORE: Trump Melts Down Over Elizabeth Warren’s Accusations

Wholesale prices in July skyrocketed 0.9%, against expectations of 0.2%. That’s more than four times what analysts thought would happen.

“The cost of wholesale goods and services — where rising inflation tends to show up first — posted the biggest increase in July in three years, possibly heralding a sizable acceleration in price hikes tied to higher U.S. tariffs,” MarketWatch reported.

“Wholesale prices rose far more than expected in July,” CNBC reported, “providing a potential sign that inflation is still a threat to the U.S. economy, a Bureau of Labor Statistics report Thursday showed.”

“The producer price index, which measures final demand goods and services prices, jumped 0.9% on the month, compared to the Dow Jones estimate for a 0.2% gain. It was the biggest monthly gain since June 2022.”

READ MORE: Trump’s Kennedy Center Remarks Veer Into Grievances, False Claims, and Lessons on Grass

Economists weighed in.

“Tariff churn is starting to burn and producers are starting to feel the inflation fire heat,” Chris Rupkey, chief economist at FwdBonds, wrote in commentary on Thursday, as CNN reported. “It will only be a matter of time before producers pass their higher tariff-related costs on to the backs of inflation-weary consumers.”

“The inflation simmering on the back burner has been brought forward and is clearly starting to boil,” Rupkey warned.

Watch the video below or at this link.

READ MORE: Trump’s Soviet-Era Slip-Up Alarms Experts

 

Image via Reuters

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.