News
Top Conservative Think Tank Roasted Over ‘Retrograde’ Marriage and Family Report
The top conservative think tank in the United States has released a new policy paper, “Saving America by Saving the Family,” that a New York Times columnist has panned.
Opinion writer Jessica Grose wrote that the Heritage Foundation authors went all the way back to 1776 for their “inspiration.” They are calling their report “A Foundation for the Next 250 Years.”
“In understanding their crowning achievement, Americans must recognize that the founding fathers were, quite literally, fathers,” the report stated. “Fifty-four of the 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence married and had a total of 337 children among them — an average of six each.”
She commented, “I wondered: Are they counting the six children Thomas Jefferson had with Sally Hemings — whom he enslaved and who could not legally refuse unwanted sex — or not? What kind of example is that supposed to set?”
Grose continued, explaining, “That’s just the opening salvo of this confused, retrograde report, which leaves out a lot of important details from its rose-colored history of marriage and family in the United States.”
She called the report “a curious set of guidelines for the future, since it seems mired in culture war battles from the 20th century, unable to face the past 60 years of change.”
READ MORE: These 19 Democrats May Already Be Jockeying for a Presidential Run: Report
The Heritage Foundation is the right-wing think tank behind Project 2025, which, it could be argued, is focused on returning America to far more conservative and traditional social, cultural, and institutional beliefs.
Grose noted that Heritage “seems to want to take a time machine back to when women were financially dependent on men and gay marriage was not legal.”
She also noted the discrepancies in Heritage’s thesis.
“The report’s authors know they can’t tell all women to be stay-at-home mothers (returning the country to 1960s employment levels for women) because that would contradict their other goal, to dismantle the welfare state and put even more work conditions on parents receiving government aid,” she wrote, noting that “the bulk of the paper is about ways to whittle down government support for anybody who isn’t part of a traditional married family, ideally with a male breadwinner.”
Grose says that on the one hand, “I always marvel at how we agree on some of the problems American families face,” yet on the other, can “have completely different solutions.”
Other discrepancies Grose pointed to include a poll showing that young male Trump voters see having children as their top measure of success, and marriage as their fourth.
“Instead of looking at these stats and thinking that maybe there’s a deeper problem if only conservative men are bullish about having children,” she wrote, “the authors look at the stats and think: If our government only pushed religion and traditional marriage harder legally and culturally, everyone else would fall in line.”
READ MORE: ‘Damage Control’: Trump Mocked for New Weekly Barnstorming Blitz Months Ahead of Midterms
Image via Shutterstock
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
![]() |

























