News
‘Overindulgence to Unjustified Criticism’: Experts Mixed on US Attorney in Hunter Biden Case Gaining Special Counsel Status
Early Friday afternoon Attorney General Merrick Garland announced he has granted U.S. Attorney David Weiss special counsel status to continue his current investigation into Hunter Biden, while officially affording him complete independence. Weiss, appointed as U.S. Attorney for Delaware by then-President Donald Trump, has been investigating the son of U.S. President Joe Biden for several years. President Biden did not replace Weiss when winning the White House to avoid any possible perception of interference in Weiss’ investigation.
BREAKING: Attorney General Merrick Garland has appointed David Weiss as special counsel to oversee the Hunter Biden investigation. https://t.co/2a1d9Bovxu pic.twitter.com/BMtHow81r7
— CBS News (@CBSNews) August 11, 2023
Legal experts were quick to weigh in, with reaction mixed. Some support the move as wise to tamp down GOP criticism of Weiss’ investigation, despite him having been appointed by Donald Trump. Some are questioning the move.
Noted national security attorney Brad Moss supports Garland’s move.
“Good. Transparency and accountability regardless of party. I’m fine with it,” Moss writes.
Former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Harry Litman comments on how Garland’s decision should remove misconceptions promoted by the political right.
“Appointment of Weiss as special counsel feels like overindulgence to unjustified criticism to me, but no harm done. He could have had the authority as ‘special attorney’ had he asked; and special counsel appointment just takes away a bogus talking point,” Litman says.
“Recall that whistleblower heard Weiss say ‘Im not a special attorney’ and misinterpreted it as saying he’s not a special counsel,” he continues, “ergo subject to Garland control, which he wasn’t. But this leaves no doubt and quiets the criticism.”
He adds, “and, importantly, Weiss made the request to be elevated, so that basically forced Garland’s hand. Hard to imagine his rebuffing the request under the circumstances even if the DOJ wd staunchly resist the idea that there is a conflict of interest in current investigation of Hunter.”
But former FBI General Counsel Andrew Weissmann notes, “A special counsel is supposed to be from outside the govt (sec 600.3(a)), so how is this consistent with the Special Counsel regulations? Weiss already messed up the Hunter plea greenest to a fate the well – now this.”
Attorney Max Kennerly appears to agree.
“This violates the special counsel regs (28 CFR § 600.3, because Weiss isn’t ‘outside the U.S. government’) and makes no sense anyway. Weiss had years and found only two tax misdemeanors and a gun charge that wouldn’t survive a Bruen challenge. Then he botched the plea deal,” he writes.
“Maybe we’ll get lucky,” Kennerly adds, “and Garland appointing David Weiss special counsel as a prelude to firing him as US Attorney for Delaware. Because it’s ridiculous there’s still a Trump appointee sitting as a US Attorney more than two years after Biden took office.”
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.