News
DOJ Now Looking at Two Espionage Cases as They Ponder Possible Trump Indictments: Legal Analyst

During an appearance on MSNBC’s “The Katie Phang Show,” former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade explained why a report on how the Department of Justice is working diligently on how to prosecute Donald Trump for espionage indicates that investigators have the goods on the former president.
On Friday an MSNBC report stated a case in Hawaii and one in Kansas City that led to espionage charges are both being scrutinized for tips on how to pursue a Trump indictment, explaining it is “a major part of the calculus for Justice Department officials as they decide whether to move forward with charges against the former president over the classified documents found in his Florida home.”
According to McQuade, that means things have grown more serious for the former president.
“There are two questions that prosecutors ask themselves when deciding whether to bring charges,” the former prosecutor began. “The first is: can we charge? That is, is there sufficient evidence to prove the case? That’s the first question, but then there’s that second question: should we bring a case? That’s when the government looks to whether or not there’s a federal — substantial evidence to bring a case.”
ALSO IN THE NEWS: ‘A new election must be called for immediately!’: Trump flips out after another Senate win for Dems
“We want to have uniformity in the kind of cases you prosecute,” she elaborated. “In cases involving the mishandling of classified documents, typically prosecutors look for some aggravating factor beyond just mishandling. If you innocently bring home a document in your briefcase, typically that is not prosecuted. you might be disciplined. you might lose your clearance you might lose your job, but probably not be criminally prosecuted.”
“It’s some of those factors that she mentioned in the Hawaii case and others, whether the person acted willfully, that is they knew they were violating the law,” she told the host, “Whether they were disloyal to the United States, sold them to a foreign government for example, or whether they obstructed justice.”
“That’s probably the factor that is most salient in the Trump investigation,” she concluded.
Watch below or at the link:
Image: Evan El-Amin / Shutterstock.com
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
![]() |