Matt Gaetz Paid Consulting Fee to Roger Stone’s Shady Tax Shelter as He Struggles to Contain Sex Trafficking Scandal
Newly released campaign documents for Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) show the scandal-plagued congressman has spent the last month in “full damage control mode,” reports the Daily Beast.
In particular, the documents show Gaetz has been spending heavily on direct mail and TV ad blitzes intended to contain the fallout of revelations that he’s being investigated by the FBI for potential involvement in sex trafficking.
The Florida Republican has been trying to shore up public support in his panhandle district by blanketing the airwaves with ads that urge constituents to “fight back” against “a multi-week fake news cycle” about the investigation into whether Gaetz paid for sex with multiple women, including one who was just 17 years old at the time.
The most curious Gaetz campaign expense, however, was a payment made to infamous right-wing operative and convicted felon Roger Stone.
“One expense in particular will raise eyebrows: A $5,000 ‘strategic political consulting’ fee to Drake Ventures, the company belonging to longtime GOP smear artist and Gaetz associate Roger Stone,” the publication writes. “On Friday, the DOJ sued Stone and his wife, Nydia, alleging that the couple owes millions in unpaid taxes and have used Drake Ventures to shelter more than $1 million.”
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
‘Mafia in Action’: Legal Experts Concerned by Giuliani and Son Walking Into White House During Impeachment Articles Vote
Legal experts are perplexed and expressing concern on the news Rudy Giuliani, who reportedly is under criminal investigation, walked into the White House just as the Judiciary Committee was passing Articles of Impeachment against President Donald Trump.
CNN’s Jim Sciutto and others posted this photo around 10:30 AM Friday morning:
Trump has been emboldened, not chastened, by impeachment. His personal attorney is at the WH right now after his trip to Ukraine to continue to dig up dirt on Joe Biden, the heart of this impeachment itself. And GOP is no longer lodging any protest. This is the reality for 2020. pic.twitter.com/Qhfs1CyJjD
— Jim Sciutto (@jimsciutto) December 13, 2019
Giuliani’s son Andrew, reportedly a failed pro golfer, works for the White House as Public Liaison Assistant to President Donald Trump. He makes $95,000 annually – more than twice as much as the Obama official who held that office previously – and is unofficially Trump’s “liaison to the sports community.”
Attorney Amee Vanderpool summed up the issue.
“So the man who has been creating false spin about Joe Biden creating favors and access for his son, just brought his own son to the Oval during Trump’s most critical time in office.”
Former SDNY Federal Prosecutor Mimi Rocah summed up the consternation many are feeling.
Mafia in action at the White House. This is just so surreal. https://t.co/FBizu10kLK
— Mimi Rocah (@Mimirocah1) December 13, 2019
CNN national security analyst and former Obama National Security Council advisor:
Ask yourself what kind of President opens the WH gates to a man under counterintelligence investigation?
Hope Rudy left his phone at home. Otherwise a lot of people are probably listening to his WH meetings. https://t.co/S6AbkHxr7K
— Sam Vinograd (@sam_vinograd) December 13, 2019
Former U.S. Attorney now a law professor and an MSNBC legal analyst:
I thought Trump would throw Rudy under the bus. I was wrong. What must that mean Rudy knows? https://t.co/fAX0vydxUn
— Joyce Alene (@JoyceWhiteVance) December 13, 2019
The Ukraine scheming continues as the House impeaches the president for Ukraine scheming. https://t.co/PNz4gjTnWQ
— Helen Kennedy (@HelenKennedy) December 13, 2019
Attorney and commentator:
There’s a year left until the 2020 election. Giuliani is continuing the complained of behavior at the WH. Mitch McConnell has openly stated that he is coordinating with the WH. The House wields some power over this now, but it seems to be in an irrational hurry to give it up. https://t.co/9Fq4jrKj9f
— southpaw (@nycsouthpaw) December 13, 2019
Former special assistant to the president who sat on President Barack Obama’s National Security Council:
This is why impeachment matters 👇 https://t.co/kNfJpwboFW
— Jeffrey Prescott (@jeffreyprescott) December 13, 2019
Internet Explodes as Trump Tweets He’s Reversing Brand New North Korea Sanctions – Because He ‘Likes’ Kim Jong-un
‘Mad King Foreign Policy’
President Donald Trump is literally conducting foreign policy via Twitter. Friday afternoon from Mar-a-Lago the President tweeted that he is reversing sanctions Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin imposed just 24 hours ago.
It was announced today by the U.S. Treasury that additional large scale Sanctions would be added to those already existing Sanctions on North Korea. I have today ordered the withdrawal of those additional Sanctions!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 22, 2019
The President did not accurately describe when they were placed into effect, as CNN’s Sarah Westwood reported:
Administration officials are confused about the meaning of President Trump’s sanctions tweet, per @kylieatwood. The Treasury Department penalized two Chinese companies yesterday for helping NK evade sanctions, but those were neither new sanctions, nor were they announced today.
— Sarah Westwood (@sarahcwestwood) March 22, 2019
The White House reportedly scrambled to support Trump’s unilateral decision, seemingly made without consultation with Treasury.
“President Trump likes Chairman Kim, and he doesn’t think these sanctions will be necessary,” White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said, according to The New York Times.
On social media, many – including experts – were stunned:
Richard Haass, the President of the Council on Foreign Relations, noted Trump usurped Secretary of State Mike Pompeo similarly this week:
in just 24 hours the secstate was surprised by Golan Heights tweet & now @realDonaldTrump has lifted new Treasury sanctions vs NK b/c he likes Chairman Kim. There is not even the pretense of a national security process. Hard to imagine what would occur if there were a real crisis
— Richard N. Haass (@RichardHaass) March 22, 2019
Former principal deputy assistant Secretary of Defense for Asian and Pacific Security Affairs weighed in with a simple but powerful three-letter statement:
— Kelly Magsamen (@kellymagsamen) March 22, 2019
Professor of international relations, political scientist, and CEO:
Quite apart from the chaos the NK reversal creates, the weakness it communicates to NK, the undermining of Mnuchin (and Bolton?), this kind of mad King foreign policy sends shockwaves through alliances and makes everyone think the US is run by an unfit leader. (We are.)
— David Rothkopf (@djrothkopf) March 22, 2019
A professor at American University who teaches intelligence and analysis mockingly referred to a top-level official at the National Security Council:
The NSC senior director for Korea is at a bar now, knocking back his 5th whiskey, thinking “I actually sought out this job.” https://t.co/Epei1cUBJ4
— Aki Peritz (@AkiPeritz) March 22, 2019
Democratic 2020 presidential candidate:
The United States of America no longer has a foreign policy. https://t.co/SnMkzYadG6
— Pete Buttigieg (@PeteButtigieg) March 22, 2019
Boston Globe columnist:
The president of the United States “likes” a sociopathic, totalitarian dictator https://t.co/9eEhQAcad4
— Michael Cohen (@speechboy71) March 22, 2019
National political reporter for NBC News:
Less than 24 hours ago, top National Security Council officials sat down reporters in the EEOB to walk through these #NorthKorea sanctions and how important they are
— Josh Lederman (@JoshNBCNews) March 22, 2019
New York Times DC correspondent:
The word “unprecedented” has been beaten into the ground, but this one really really is. Breathtaking move to undercut Mnuchin — and side with genocidal dictator of rogue nuclear state — while WH nervously awaits Mueller report, via @arappeport https://t.co/FhKC02surn
— Glenn Thrush (@GlennThrush) March 22, 2019
CNN’s Kaitlan Collins notes the sanctions are important for denuclearization:
Big. The sanctions were on Chinese shipping companies that the Trump administration said helped North Korea evade international sanctions. Treasury Secretary Mnuchin said the “full implementation” of those UN sanctions is “crucial” to the success of North Korea denuclearizing. https://t.co/RVLbxEXF2M
— Kaitlan Collins (@kaitlancollins) March 22, 2019
This is a breaking news and developing story. Details may change. This story will be updated, and NCRM will likely publish follow-up stories on this news. Stay tuned and refresh for updates.
Accused Pedophile Protector and Labor Secretary Alex Acosta Dined With SCOTUS Justice Alito in DC Last Night
A federal judge ruled he broke the law by delivering a tremendous get-out-of-jail gift to a billionaire child rapist. Now, he’s dining with a Supreme Court Justice.
Embattled Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta is under fire after a federal judge last week ruled he broke the law in how he prosecuted serial child rapist and billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. Acosta’s illegal gift to Epstein, who is extremely well-connected – including to now-President Donald Trump – allowed the billionaire pedophile to avoid federal charges and to serve only 13 months in a work-release program.
“Palm Beach multimillionaire Jeffrey Epstein, 54, was accused of assembling a large, cult-like network of underage girls — with the help of young female recruiters — to coerce into having sex acts behind the walls of his opulent waterfront mansion as often as three times a day, the Town of Palm Beach police found,” The Miami Herald reported last year.
He could have spent the rest of his life behind bars, were he fully prosecuted.
Enter U.S Attorney Alex Acosta, now President Trump’s Secretary of Labor.
“As part of the arrangement, Acosta agreed, despite a federal law to the contrary, that the deal would be kept from the victims. As a result, the non-prosecution agreement was sealed until after it was approved by the judge, thereby averting any chance that the girls — or anyone else — might show up in court and try to derail it.”
Secretary Acosta has made no indication he plans to resign.
Defending Acosta, President Trump on Friday said, “I really don’t know too much about it,” and, “I know he’s done a great job as labor secretary and that seems like a long time ago,” referring to the deal Acosta made for Epstein in 2007.
So, many on Tuesday are finding it strange and disturbing that Secretary Acosta was seen Monday night out on the town dining at a Washington, D.C. restaurant with a U.S. Supreme Court Justice, the ultra-conservative Samuel Alito.
Daily Beast reporter Betsy Woodruff tweeted out the news, noting also that “Acosta clerked for Alito.”
A tipster spotted Sec. Alexander Acosta (currently embroiled in the Epstein disaster) having dinner last night w Justice Alito at Central by Main Justice
— Betsy Woodruff (@woodruffbets) February 26, 2019
Here’s how some are responding:
A guy that broke the law for a pedophile is dining with a member of the Supreme Court. https://t.co/wkJcDHKGpX
— Capitán Colombia (@DanDanUniverse) February 26, 2019
That’s the best example we’ve seen of “the swamp” since Trump got elected on a promise to drain it. https://t.co/gbvls9F9V0
— Nancy LeTourneau (@Smartypants60) February 26, 2019
i’m starting to think that it might be bad that supreme court justices are not bound by the same ethical requirements as every other federal judge https://t.co/DUhayruxjY
— Meagan Hatcher-Mays (@importantmeagan) February 26, 2019
If you read something and it completely shocks your conscience to the point you think “that HAS to be illegal, right?” and then you find out it’s not…
It might be time to start pushing the right people to change that. https://t.co/dbfTUu68MT
— Bob Cunningham (@BCunningham215) February 26, 2019
— Elaine Benes 🌿 (@resister_sister) February 26, 2019
- News3 days ago
‘Indictment Anytime’: Experts Explain Significance of Trump’s Attorneys Meeting With DOJ – Warn Plea Deal Possible
- News2 days ago
‘Isn’t There a Beach in Mexico Waiting for You?’: Cruz Mocked for Claiming Garland Will Indict Trump Over SCOTUS Seat Loss
- News2 days ago
‘This Is It, Make No Mistake’: ‘Nihilistic Moron’ Trump Heading for Another Indictment Says George Conway
- News2 days ago
Jim Jordan Demands Merrick Garland Hand Over Documents Authorizing Special Counsel’s Trump Investigation
- 'GROTESQUE SCAREMONGERING'3 days ago
‘Untrue and Hateful’: Nikki Haley Slammed for ‘Damnable Lie’ of Blaming Teen Girls Contemplating Suicide on Trans Kids
- News23 hours ago
Pence Presidential Launch Mocked for Suggesting Drag Queens Are Assaulting ‘American Values’ – With No Mention of Trump
- News3 days ago
‘Recycling Stale and Debunked Burisma Conspiracy Theories’: Raskin Refutes Comer’s Claims as ‘Effort to Smear Biden’
- BREAKING NEWS2 days ago
Will Santos Choose Jail? Judge Rules Names of Persons Who Provided His Half-Million Dollar Bond Must Be Made Public