News
Trump Uses NY Times to Falsely Claim ‘Effort to Spy on Trump Campaign’ Was ‘Bigger Than Watergate’
President Donald Trump for more than two years has been falsely claiming President Barack Obama had the “wires tapped” at his Trump Tower campaign headquarters.
Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my “wires tapped” in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 4, 2017
Later, he falsely claimed, “the Trump Campaign for President was illegally being spied upon.”
Looking more & more like the Trump Campaign for President was illegally being spied upon (surveillance) for the political gain of Crooked Hillary Clinton and the DNC. Ask her how that worked out – she did better with Crazy Bernie. Republicans must get tough now. An illegal Scam!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 22, 2018
It’s been a regular staple of Trump’s attacks, and he’s accused President Obama or the Obama administration of spying on his campaign dozens of times.
But under then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the Dept. of Justice investigated and found zero evidence Trump’s campaign was wire tapped by the Obama administration.
The lie would not die, and recently Attorney General Bill Barr told Congress he believes the federal government spied on the Trump campaign.
The word “spy” is fraudulent at best.
As many who closely follow the news know, Robert Mueller was hired as Special Counsel after top DOJ officials were terrified that Trump might be a Russian agent or unwittingly a Russian asset.
That’s not “spying,” that’s a counterintelligence investigation, with search warrants approved by judges – all by the book.
(As recently as February former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe said “it’s possible” President Donald Trump is a Russian asset. “I think it’s possible. I think that’s why we started our investigation.”)
Trump on Friday reignited his false claims, this time by apparently citing a New York Times story from Thursday: “F.B.I. Sent Investigator Posing as Assistant to Meet With Trump Aide in 2016.”
Finally, Mainstream Media is getting involved – too “hot” to avoid. Pulitzer Prize anyone? The New York Times, on front page (finally), “Details effort to spy on Trump Campaign.” @foxandfriends This is bigger than WATERGATE, but the reverse!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 3, 2019
The phrase “Details effort to spy on Trump Campaign” appear nowhere in the Times story.
And in fact, The Times reported in May of last year, “F.B.I. Used Informant to Investigate Russia Ties to Campaign, Not to Spy, as Trump Claims.”
Highlighting the Times story is not helpful for President Trump.
“The decision to use [an investigator] in the operation aimed at a presidential campaign official shows the level of alarm inside the F.B.I. during a frantic period when the bureau was trying to determine the scope of Russia’s attempts to disrupt the 2016 election,” the Times reports. It also acknowledges it now “could also give ammunition to Mr. Trump and his allies for their spying claims.”
The Times adds that “F.B.I. officials have called the bureau’s activities in the months before the election both legal and carefully considered under extraordinary circumstances.”
Bottom line: The Trump campaign was not “spied” on, but a legal counterintelligence investigation was conducted.
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.