News
Former Acting AG Sally Yates Explains Why Trump Would Have Been Indicted If He Weren’t President
Former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, who herself was interviewed by investigators during special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation, on Sunday said she believes Donald Trump would be indicted on obstruction charges “were he not the president of the United States.”
Yates spoke with NBC’s Andrea Mitchell on “Meet the Press” about the impact of Mueller’s report and whether prosecutors would have taken further steps toward charging Trump save for the Office of Legal Counsel’s prohibition against indicting a president.
“I’ve been a prosecutor for nearly 30 years, and I can tell you I’ve personally prosecuted obstruction cases on far, far less evidence than this,” Yates explained. “And yes, I believe if he were not the president of the United States, he would likely be indicted on obstruction.”
Yates notes that in his report, Mueller laid out 10 instances where Trump worked to obstruct justice, adding the special counsel “did a very fair job in going through all 10 instances and laying out both the facts that established that he had committed the crime of obstruction, but also the defenses: both legal and factual.”
“But there are several incidents that he described to which special counsel Mueller really couldn’t point to any significant factual or legal defenses,” Yates added, specifically referencing the president’s attempts to fire the special counsel and his efforts to get former White House counsel Don McGahn to lie about those requests.
“The bigger issues is not just whether or not this establishes a crime …” Yates said. “But is this the kind of conduct that we should expect from the president of the United States?
Watch the video below:
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.