Alabama House Passes Bill Allowing Adoption Agencies to Ban Same-Sex Parents for Religious Reasons
Bill Would Allow Blood Relatives to Be Refused Adoption Rights
The Alabama House Thursday afternoon passed a discriminatory bill allowing state-funded faith-based adoption and foster agencies to ban adoption by same-sex couples or LGBT people. HB24, sponsored by Republican former NFL linebacker turned lawmaker, Rich Wingo, is falsely titled the Child Placing Agency Inclusion Act. The bill, which even applies to blood relatives, passed by a wide margin, 60-14. All Democrats voted against the legislation.
One Democrat, openly-gay State Representative Patricia Todd, told her fellow lawmakers the bill is “a direct attack against my community,” AL.com reports.
“What your vote says to me – if you vote for this bill – is that Patricia Todd is not qualified to be a fit parent,” she added, “based on the fact that I love a woman, and it’s not based on what is the best placement for the child,” she said.
Thank you my fellow Democrats who helped me filibuster the adoption bill. Only the dems voted NO
— Patricia Todd (@reptodd) March 16, 2017
The Human Rights Campaign reports the bill affects “LGBTQ couples, interfaith couples, single parents, married couples in which one prospective parent has previously been divorced, or other parents to whom the agency has a religious objection. The measure would even allow agencies to refuse to place foster children with members of their own extended families — a practice often considered to be in the best interest of the child. A qualified, loving LGBTQ grandparent, for example, could be deemed unsuitable under the proposed law.”
Told that Alabama adoption agencies have never had a problem, Wingo told lawmakers, “I’d like to think that we’re being proactive instead of being reactive.”
HRC’s Eva Kendrick in a statement called the bill “disappointing,” saying that “legislators in the House seem focused on creating new ways to discriminate against LGBTQ people instead of securing loving homes for these children. And it is deeply disturbing that on ‘pro-life day’ the House has embraced a measure limiting the number of qualified, prospective foster and adoptive families who could offer these children the homes they deserve.”
The Senate will now take up the bill.
To comment on this article and other NCRM content, visit our Facebook page.
Image by Thomas Hawk via Flickr and a CC license
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.