At Friday’s Democratic Forum Rachel Maddow challenged Hillary ClintonÂ to explain her comments that DOMA was a “defensive action.”
Friday night Rachel Maddow askedÂ Hillary ClintonÂ to weigh in on Houston’s just-defeated HERO equal rights ordinance, and to explain comments she had made two weeks ago in a previous interview with the MSNBC anchor about DOMA.
The conversation begins at the 1:30 mark in the MSNBC video above.
Clinton had calledÂ DOMA, the Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 that banned the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages, a “defensive action” to thwart off a possible attempt of an even greater anti-gay threat: a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex couples from marrying.
Some LGBT activists responded angrily to Clinton’s classification, claiming there had been no threat of a constitutional amendment, Â while others agreed the climate had been so anti-gay that it was possible. Buzzfeed’s Chris Geidner last week authored a report stating there were no documents in the Clinton Presidential LibraryÂ to prove the former First Lady’s claim.
“Well, certainly, in thinking back on it, those were private conversations that people did have,” Clinton told Maddow during the Democratic Forum in South Carolina. “And I am more than willing to say, again, that was something that came up in private discussions.”
Clinton then quickly shifted, stressing that the “important thing is: DOMA is gone.”
“Look what happened under the George W. Bush Administration when it was Karl Roveâ€™s strategy to put constitutional amendments on state ballots, which all but a few passed,” the former First Lady, Senator, and Secretary of State added.
Calling itÂ “a very real problem that people were concerned about,” Clinton offered, “if Iâ€™m wrong about the public debate, I obviously take responsibility for that. But I think the important thing is that we are now beyond that. My husband has certainly said, and I agree with what he said, that now, thankfully, we have moved to a stage where marriage equality is the law of the land.”
“What we havenâ€™t yet done is to deal with the discrimination that still exists, and try to figure out how you can help people who can now legally get married on Saturday and then get fired on Monday,” she said, to great applause. “And that’s the next big challenge.”
Maddow then moved to the defeat of Houston’s HERO equal rights ordinance and asked Clinton what went wrong, given that Houston is a “blue dot” of progressivism in red Texas.
The Democratic frontrunner agreed with Maddow, saying that HERO “is similar to ordinances in cities across America, including in other cities in Texas.”
“But what the far right did, very successfully, is really engender a lot of fear and a lot of anxiety, and create this backlash against this ordinance. And they used the bathroom issue. And yet, you could go to another city in Texas, like San Antonio, and you would know that that was totally without merit, that there was no basis for it.”
“I think this is a reminder that if you stand for equal rights, if you stand against discrimination, you donâ€™t just do it once and youâ€™re done,” Clinton said, again to great applause. “Youâ€™ve got to keep fighting for it, youâ€™ve got to keep standing up for it, youâ€™ve got to keep moving forward.”
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
‘Insidious and Evil’: Fox News Host Goes Off on Crazed Rant Attacking Biden Child Tax Credit ‘Hike’
Fox News Business anchor Charles Payne made a staggeringly false series of statements attacking the Biden child tax credit expansion, which goes into effect July 15. Parents could see up to $600 more monthly, with the federal government effectively paying forward the credit so families don’t have to wait until they file their annual income tax returns to get the funds up to a year later.
Not according to Payne, who somehow managed to link the child tax credit to critical race theory, falsely claimed it is only for parents who are “not working,” suggested it will breed a cycle of poverty for generations while “young ladies” to have more children so they can “make” more money, rather than develop their “God-given gifts.”
Literally not one word of that is true.
“Fox & Friends” host Steve Doocy introduced the segment, and appeared to be in support of the program. Payne quickly turned the conversation on its head, politicizing what most American families will welcome as extra money to help with child care, or food, rent, health care, or maybe even starting a business.
“This aims to pay people extra money for not working,” Payne said, which is false. Fox News’ sister outlet, the New York Post reports the expanded child tax credit “is available for couples who earn $150,000 or less a year, heads of households who earn $112,500 or less and individuals who earn $75,000 or less.”
Payne immediately likened giving those parents – 36 million families – to what can only be described as the racist “welfare queen” rhetoric of Ronald Reagan. The chyron called it a “tax credit hike,” which could easily be misconstrued by those not paying complete attention as a “tax hike.”
“And this is where it becomes very dangerous,” Payne alleged. “It doesn’t replace anything. If you’re on Medicaid, if you’re on SNAP, if you’re on WIC, if you’re a food stamps, if you get Section 8 housing, it doesn’t impact any of that. You don’t have to work, you don’t have to try to work. So what we’re going to do is we’re going to get young women, you know, young ladies who are going to be sitting around maybe saying, ‘I’m not sure what my economic opportunities are,'” he claimed, which is false and sexist, given that the payments are to parents, not just “young ladies.”
Payne went on to say the child tax credit “becomes a very attractive alternative to try to make it in a society and you guys have known these stories all morning long with CRT,” he said, somehow linking it to child race theory, because that’s the stated the goal on the right, to link critical race theory to anything conservatives don’t like.
“But if I go down this path, every time I have another child, I get more money, every single time,” he complained. Republicans for years have been falsely claiming that they are “pro-family,” yet don’t enact policies that support families.
“Now of course this is what breaks my heart because I saw it I saw the Great Welfare Society, firsthand, I lived in the midst of it,” Payne said, calling it “a heartbreaking, insidious and evil thing.”
There is no such thing as the “Great Welfare Society.”
The Great Society was a set of programs under President Lyndon Johnson that expanded on President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s “New Deal.”
Payne falsely claimed “the people that you argue that you’re helping, you’d never give them an alternative to say, ‘Hey, I was born with some God-given gifts. I want to dig in, I want to find what they are. I want to cultivate them. I want to I want to nurture them.’ Now you’d never do that.”
Except that’s exactly what the child tax credit program does, helps parents focus on working and focus on their families.
Fox host ramblingly connects child tax credits to what he calls “critical race theory,” whining that people make money for every kid they have so they won’t cultivate their talents into success. Just a bunch of verbose, confused, unhinged nonsense. pic.twitter.com/D9cjvpDiqr
— Bobby Lewis (@revrrlewis) June 22, 2021
Thanks to Media Matters’ Bobby Lewis for the video.
Trump Tried to Sic Dept. of Justice Attorneys on SNL Because They Ridiculed Him: Report
According to a report from the Daily Beast, Donald Trump pressed aides to get government lawyers to go after late-night TV shows like Saturday Night Live for the way that they were treating him.
Trump, whose blustery style was recreated by actor Alec Baldwin, was reportedly obsessed with how he was mocked by late-night comics and reportedly asked administration officials to bring legal pressure to bear to stop it — only to be told there was no legal mechanism available.
According to the report, in 2019, Trump tweeted, “It’s truly incredible that shows like Saturday Night Live, not funny/no talent, can spend all of their time knocking the same person (me), over & over, without so much of a mention of ‘the other side. Like an advertisement without consequences. Same with Late Night Shows. Should Federal Election Commission and/or FCC look into this?”
That tweet was not just the president ranting to his base — he was serious.
“It was, on its face, a ridiculous question and threat, as SNL is obviously satire, and therefore a form of protected speech in America that pissed-off commanders-in-chief have no authority to directly subvert. However, then-President Trump went farther than simply tweeting his displeasure with the late-night comedians and SNLwriters’ room,” the report states. “The internal discussions that followed, between the former leader of the free world and some of his political and legal advisers, once again underscored just how much Trump wanted to use the full weight and power of the U.S. government to punish his personal enemies.”
According to the report, those on the receiving end of Trump’s complaints considered the problem trivial and not worth the time to investigate it, with one insider claiming, “It was more annoying than alarming, to be honest with you.”
“According to two people familiar with the matter, Trump had asked advisers and lawyers in early 2019 about what the Federal Communications Commission, the courts systems, and—most confusingly to some Trump lieutenants—the Department of Justice could do to probe or mitigate SNL, Jimmy Kimmel, and other late-night comedy mischief-makers,” the Beast reported.
“In early 2019, Trump had to be repeatedly advised that the ‘equal-time’ rules to which he appeared to refer wouldn’t even apply in this situation, given that late-night shows and NBC sketch comedy are clearly staged satire, and thus not bound by the same requirements of other forms of broadcast TV and radio,” the report continues. “The other source, who has a law degree, said that when they briefly discussed this with Trump more than two years ago, they made a point of saying that the Justice Department, in particular, doesn’t handle these matters, anyway.”
That advice reportedly infuriated the ex-president who replied, “Can something else be done about it?” only to be mollified by an aide responding “with some version of ‘I’ll look into it.’ (This person says that to this day, they have not, in fact, ‘looked into it.’)”
You can read more here.
Watch: America, We Just Got Our First Openly-Gay Active NFL Player
America, meet your first openly-gay, active NFL player.
Las Vegas Raiders defensive lineman Carl Nassib, 28, in an Instagram video announced he is gay, HuffPost reports.
“What’s up people, I’m Carl Nassib. I’m at my house in West Chester, Pennsylvania,” Nassib says. “I just wanted to take a quick moment to say that I’m gay. I’ve been meaning to do this for a while now, but, I finally feel comfortable now to get it off my chest. I really have the best life, the best family, friends and job a guy can ask for.”
He also says he’s donating $100,000 to The Trevor Project, which works to help young LGBTQ youth in crisis or feeling suicidal.
View this post on Instagram
“I’m a pretty private person so I hope you guys know that I’m not doing this for attention,” Nassib adds. “I just think that representation and visibility are so important. I actually hope that one day, videos like this and the whole coming out process are not necessary, but until then I will do my best and my part to cultivate a culture that’s accepting and compassionate and I’m going to start by donating $100,000 to the Trevor Project. They’re an incredible organization, they’re the number one suicide-prevention service for LGBTQ youth in America, and they’re truly doing incredible things, and I’m very excited to be a part of it, to help in any way that I can and I’m really pumped to see what the future holds.”
In one of the several text images on that post Nassib explains why this is so important:
- RELIGIOUS EXTREMISM2 days ago
‘Final Straw’: Priest Warns Catholic Bishops Parishioners Are Furious Church Is Choosing Trump Over Faithful Biden
- 'SOMETHING DOESN'T FEEL RIGHT'2 days ago
Trump’s Announcement of Rallies With Bill O’Reilly Sets Off Furious Backlash Among QAnon Supporters: Report
- News3 days ago
Trump Cabinet Secretary Set Up a $300 Million Offshore Company in the Caymans — While Still in Office
- HATE CRIMES3 days ago
One Killed in ‘Terrorist Attack Against the LGBT Community’: Fort Lauderdale Mayor
- DEADLY INCOMPETENCE24 hours ago
Pence Chief of Staff Made Decision on Masks That Paved the Way for Them to Be Politicized – Leading to Massive Death
- RELIGIOUS HYPOCRISY21 hours ago
‘Just the Worst. I’m Sorry but She Is’: Internet Slams Meghan McCain for Claiming Biden ‘Doing Grave Spiritual Harm’
- NARCISSISM1 day ago
Trump Has Given Interviews for 17 Books – But Bans Two Reporters Whose Bombshells Revealed the Worst About Him
- CRIME1 day ago
Feds Investigating Whether Roger Stone ‘Radicalized’ Trump Supporters Who Stormed Capitol: Report