Mike Huckabee Just Said The Dred Scott Decision ‘Remains To This Day The Law Of The Land’
Mike Huckabee just displayed his extreme and willful ignorance about very basics issues of American jurisprudence.Â
Mike Huckabee for months has been peddling a faulty understanding of how the law in America works. The former Arkansas governor insists that unless a local, state, or federal lawmaking body, like your city council or the U.S. Congress, passes a bill and it is signed into law, it isn’t law. In other words, everything is illegal unless a law makes it legal.Â
On top of that false theory, Huckabee insists that the Supreme Court cannot “make laws.” So if they strike down a law, say, a ban on same-sex marriage, that does not mean that same-sex marriage is legal.
Some may have bought into this fiddle-faddle, but now Huckabee has pushed his unique version of jurisprudence too far.
“Mike Huckabee said Wednesday that the Supreme Court’s 1857 ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford — which held that all blacks, free or enslaved, could not be American citizens — is still the law of the land even though no one follows it,” Buzzfeed’s Christopher Massie reports today.
Of course, nearly every high school student, and many even younger, know that the 14th Amendment overturned the Dred Scott decision.
“I’ve been just drilled by TV hosts over the past week, ‘How dare you say that, uh, it’s not the law of the land?’†Huckabee told right wing radio host Michael Medved. “Because that’s their phrase, ‘it’s the law of the land. Michael, the Dred Scott decision of 1857 still remains to this day the law of the land which says that black people aren’t fully human. Does anybody still follow the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision?â€
Medved asked Huckabee if he would try, if elected president, to overturn the Supreme Court’s ruling on same-sex marriage.
“I don’t think that’s necessary,†Huckabee said. “Because, in the case of this decision, it goes back to what Jefferson said that if a decision is rendered that is not borne out by the will of the people either through their elected people and gone through the process, if you just say, it’s the law of the land because the court decided, then Jefferson said, ‘You now have surrendered to judicial tyranny.’â€
“The Supreme Court in the same-sex marriage decision made a law and they made it up out of thin air. Therefore, until Congress decides to codify that and give it a statute it’s really not an operative law and that’s why what Kim Davis did was operate under not only the Kentucky Constitution which was the law under which she was elected but she’s operating under the fact that there’s no statute in her state nor at the federal level that authorizes her,†Huckabee claimed.
Listen:
Needless to say, responses on Twitter have been quick:
Mike Huckabee just said the Dred Scott “remains to this day the law of the land.†This is a holy-shit moment, folks. http://t.co/aZhYlIbOQL
— Jamil Smith (@JamilSmith) September 10, 2015
Good LORD. Idiot. Evil. http://t.co/R2W2WU2dvZ
— Brett Riley (@brettwrites) September 10, 2015
And this man thinks he’s capable of being president? http://t.co/d7rNfjEM3O
— Legally W(h)ining (@WineAboutLaw) September 10, 2015
Huckabee gets his history entirely wrong in rush to exploit slavery to defend his opposition to marriage equality. http://t.co/GiYosrabon
— @red3blog (@red3blog) September 10, 2015
Mike Huckabee is proof that Tea Party favorites know the least about the constitution http://t.co/YBhL3NWji4
— Brian Tashman (@briantashman) September 10, 2015
I just can’t get past the fact that Huckabee says one SCOTUS decision (Dred Scott) is the law of the land, and then comes out and says (1/2)
— Jordan Meehan (@JordanMeehan) September 10, 2015
That SCOTUS marriage decision isn’t the law of the land because SCOTUS decisions “aren’t laws.” Do you not see the failure of logic? (2/2)
— Jordan Meehan (@JordanMeehan) September 10, 2015
Like how did Huckabee run a STATE when he has absolutely no concept of judicial power and basic constitutional knowledge? Mind blowing.
— Jordan Meehan (@JordanMeehan) September 10, 2015
Â
Image: Screenshot via Courier-JournalÂ

Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
![]() |