“Ever Have Sex With A Puerto Rican or Hit On Someone Of The Same Sex?”
One of the fastest-growing Facebook sites is for a simple game that has you add up how much you “owe” for your “transgressions.” “My Fine Is” is UK-based, so the fines are in British pounds. You select the “bad” things you’ve done, then add up the “cost.” I’ve been looking at it all afternoon – I’ll tell you why in a moment – and I can attest that the site is gaining ten thousand fans per hour. I’ve seen the membership rise from 80,000 to over 120,000 in just four hours! (By the way, did I mention The New Civil Rights Movement has a Facebook site?…)
Problem is that several of the ways to raise your score were truly offensive.
I contacted the creator via Facebook and to my great surprise, he was more than interested in making changes. So, while I still think the “game” is a bit ridiculous, I’m pleased that its creator, Bryn Arundale, was so interested in doing the right thing. He responded,Â “I am not out to offend anyone,please except my apologies.” [sic] Which, considering he could have told me to go pound salt, I thought was great.
Here’s the original list. I’ve bolded the most offensive ones – offensive as in “how dare they claim this is offensive!” Don’t get me wrong – there are others on this list that are “offensive” too. (I’m sure you have your own thoughts.)
Here’s the “game”:
My Fine Isâ€¦.
You donâ€™t have to confess your answers, just the amount of your fine.
Fines can only be added once, not for how ever many times you have done it.
Smoked weed â€” Â£10
Did acid or pills â€” Â£5
Ever had sex at church â€” Â£25
Woke up in the morning and did not know the person who was next to you â€” Â£40
Had sex with someone on MySpace/Facebook/Bebo etc â€” Â£25
Had sex for money â€” Â£100
Ever had sex with a Puerto Rican â€” Â£20
Vandalized something â€” Â£20
Had sex on your parentsâ€™ bed â€” Â£10
Beat up someone â€” Â£20
Been jumped â€” Â£10
Cross dressed â€” Â£10
Given money to stripper â€” Â£25
Been in love with a stripper â€” Â£20
Kissed someone whoâ€™s name you didnâ€™t know â€” Â£0.10
Hit on some one of the same sex while at work â€” Â£15
Ever drive and drank â€” Â£20
Ever got drunk at work, or went to work while still drunk â€” Â£50
Used toys while having sex â€” Â£30
Got drunk, passed out and donâ€™t remember the night before â€” Â£20
Went skinny dipping â€” Â£5
Had sex in a pool â€” Â£20
Kissed someone of the same sex â€” Â£10
Had sex with someone of the same sex â€” Â£20
Cheated on your significant other â€” Â£10
Masturbated â€” Â£10
Cheated on your significant other with their relative or close friend â€” Â£20
Done oral â€” Â£5
Got oral â€” Â£5
Done / got oral in a vehicle while it was moving â€” Â£25
Stole something â€” Â£10
Had sex with someone in jail â€” Â£25
Made a nasty home video or took pictures â€” Â£15
Had a threesome â€” Â£50
Had sex in public â€” Â£20
Been in the same room while someone was having sex â€“Â£25
Stole something worth over more than a hundred quidâ€“ Â£20
Had sex with someone 10 years older â€” Â£20
Had sex with someone under the age accepted by rule of thumb (half your age plus 7) â€” Â£25
Been in love with two people or more at the same timeâ€“ Â£50
Said you love someone but didnâ€™t mean it â€” Â£25
Went streaking â€” Â£5
Went streaking in broad daylight â€” Â£15
Been arrested â€” Â£5
Spent time in jail â€” Â£15
Pissed in the pool â€” Â£0.50
Played spin the bottle â€” Â£5
Done something you regret â€” Â£20
Had sex with your best friend â€” Â£20
Had sex with someone you work with at work â€” Â£25
Had anal sex â€” Â£80
Lied to your mate â€” Â£5
Lied to your mate about the sex being good â€” Â£25
In the updated list, and after suggesting some changes myself, Arundale changed Ever had sex with a Puerto Rican to Ever had sex with a Stranger.
Hit on some one of the same sex while at work to Hit on some one while at work
Had anal sex to Had unprotected anal sex
I’ve asked him to consider changing Kissed someone of the same sex and Had sex with someone of the same sex. I hope he will. There are others on the list that I’m uncomfortable with, like “Cross dressed,” and “Had sex with someone 10 years older” that I would just like to see removed.
I’m not out to take away anyone’s fun, but fun at the expense of a wide swath of society is not good, and, I thought it was a good opportunity to remind folks of what’s not safe.
So, what are your thoughts? What would you like to see changed and to what?
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
Trump Has Now ‘Crossed the Line Into Criminal Threats’: Top Legal Scholar
It’s been weeks since Special Counsel Jack Smith asked U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan to impose a narrow limitation on the ex-president in the case charging him with attempting to overturn the 2020 election. It likely will be weeks until that Judge Chutkan announces a decision.
In the mean time, Trump continues to make disparaging remarks and what some have suggested are thinly-veiled threats or calls to action to his supporters against those he perceives as his enemies.
Trump recently suggested that his former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley, “in times gone by” would have been executed for treason.
Milley’s perceived “treasonous” crime, according to Trump? Making a White House approved call to China to let them know Trump wasn’t planning to attack China, as the AP reported.
Last month, Trump wrote on Truth Social that General Milley “was actually dealing with China to give them a heads up on the thinking of the President of the United States. This is an act so egregious that, in times gone by, the punishment would have been DEATH! A war between China and the United States could have been the result of this treasonous act.”
Special Counsel Jack Smith included that post in his communication with Judge Chutkan on Friday.
NEW: In 22-page Friday night filing in support of a limited gag order in Trump’s 2020 Election conspiracy case, Special Counsel Jack Smith includes this image ====> pic.twitter.com/6uWryST0Y8
— Scott MacFarlane (@MacFarlaneNews) September 30, 2023
Monday morning, inside a Manhattan courthouse before the start of New York Attorney General Letitia James’ $250 million civil fraud case, Trump unleashed an angry rant in front of news cameras, saying, “You ought to go after this attorney general.” He also called New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron a “rogue judge.”
He added, “now I have to go before a rogue judge, as a continuation of Russia, Russia, Russia, as a continuation of the greatest witch hunt of all time. And I don’t think the people of this country are going to stand for it.”
Donald Trump: “I don’t think the people of this country are going to stand for it…This is a disgrace. And you ought to go after this attorney general.” pic.twitter.com/gXlff6Fs8R
— Republican Accountability (@AccountableGOP) October 2, 2023
These were just Trump’s remarks at the start of the day. He faced the cameras two other times, during the lunch break and after the day’s proceedings had ended.
Describing Trump’s remarks, Vanity Fair’s Bess Levin wrote: “Speaking to reporters outside the courtroom, Trump called the case a ‘witch hunt’ and ‘a disgrace,’ saying, ‘You ought to go after this attorney general,’ because if there’s one thing the man loves, it’s a not-so-veiled threat against his enemies.”
Harvard University Professor Emeritus Laurence Tribe, a legal scholar and expert on the U.S. Constitution, on Monday warned Trump’s remarks “crossed the line into criminal threats.”
“Trump’s 1st Amendment freedom of speech includes the right to express his racist views about anyone, including Attorney General Letitia James,” Tribe wrote. “But he has no right to foment violence against her. He crossed the line into criminal threats when he said ‘you ought to go after this attorney general.'”
Former Chicago Tribune editor Mark Jacob, responding to the video, writes: “When Trump says “you ought to go after this attorney general,” we know what he means. Some call it stochastic terrorism, but I call it puppetmaster terrorism. He’s telling his crazed followers who the targets are.”
See the post and video above or at this link.
Gaetz Needs Just Five Republicans to Oust McCarthy – He Already Has Three
After weeks of “chaos” within the House Republican conference that led to a down-to-the-wire near-shutdown of the federal government, U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) has spent the past two days vowing to oust Speaker Kevin McCarthy for reaching across the aisle to pass legislation keeping the government running.
Gaetz’s own future is in question with some of his Republican colleagues vowing to expel him should an unfavorable report be released by the House Ethics Committee on his possible sexual misconduct and illicit behaviors including possible drug use and possible public corruption.
“Several Republicans,” CNN’s Manu Raju reports, are “expected to back motion to eject McCarthy,” who “will very likely” need Democrats to keep his Speakership.
“House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries has not said if his caucus would join right-wing Republicans to help topple McCarthy or if Democrats might support him in exchange for political or legislative favors,” Reuters reported late Monday afternoon. “Democrats, in theory, could demand that McCarthy honor his spending deal with Biden, drop the impeachment inquiry, or hold votes on gun and immigration legislation.”
But Gaetz already has three publicly declared votes to oust Speaker McCarthy. In addition to himself, far right Republican Rep. Eli Crane of Arizona responded “Let’s roll” Sunday afternoon to Gaetz’s announcement he would file a “motion to vacate” against McCarthy.
And U.S. Rep. Bob Good of Virginia has also declared he would “never” vote to let McCarthy keep the Speaker’s gavel.
Other far right Republicans, including U.S. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Byron Donalds, and Chip Roy, have indicated they would not support ousting McCarthy, at least not right now.
But Gaetz may have time on his side.
While he on Monday acknowledged he probably doesn’t have the votes yet, the math could line up differently by the end of the week.
The Senate will not be in session after Wednesday, with many Senators expected to travel to California for the funeral of U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein.
“This could create some level of havoc on House side — dozens of [House] members will also want to fly out to SF,” noted Washington Post congressional reporter Paul Kane. “Maybe even McCarthy, but mostly House Dems. If the motion to vacate vote is Wednesday or Thursday, attendance could be haphazard.”
‘Sodom and Gomorrah’: ND Republican Unleashes Anti-LGBTQ Christian Nationalist Rant Calling for ‘Christ Is King’ Laws
North Dakota state Representative Brandon Prichard, a Republican who co-sponsored legislation that was passed in to law that bans all gender confirming surgeries and medication for minors in his state, went on an anti-LGBTQ Christian nationalist tirade including a call for state ordinances to declare “Jesus Christ is King.”
“Every conservative state should put into code that Jesus Christ is King and dedicate their state to Him. Force RINOs to say no to Jesus and then brutalize them in elections. We need a government of Christians, not fakers,” wrote Rep. Pritchard Sunday evening.
Pushback came swiftly, from politicos including former Republican and former U.S. Rep. Joe Walsh, who responded saying, “Not in this country. Never. Our Constitution won’t allow it. And that’s a damn good thing. Shame on you.”
Rep. Pritchard’s remarks in recent days have taken on a similarly strong Christian nationalist theme.
“Here is a simple test to determine if you are conservative: Should the church of Satan or satanic temple be allowed the freedom to worship in the same way as Christians? If you answer yes, you need to rethink your claimed political identity because you are not conservative,” he wrote Friday.
Later that same day he added, “Real conservatives will never put the constitution above natural law. The constitution is only useful insofar as it forces our government to limit power and pursue objective truth. It is a powerful means to an end, nothing more, nothing less.”
Over the weekend Pritchard issued a call to ban pornography, saying it “serves no positive benefit in society, destroys men, and treats women as objects.”
A social media account that appears to be for the adult site Just for Fans mocked him, writing on social media, “If you want to cancel an account, please contact our customer service department.”
Also over the weekend Pritchard called for any Republican who thinks children should be allowed to attend drag shows be “censured or expelled from the party.”
He then wrote he was “extremely disappointed” with North Dakota State University “over their decision to have two homecoming kings and NO homecoming queen. People will be mad when I introduce a bill next session to say that state-funded schools cannot pick homecoming royalty of the same sex, but I didn’t start the fight.”
Pritchard also declared, “All schools should have LGBTQ history taught and lesson one should be Sodom and Gomorrah.”
Monday morning the lawmaker claimed, “All I want is to buy some land, raise a family, and mind my own business. Everything changes when you realize the left is militantly against this existence and will do everything to destroy our families and religion. We must take power or risk being controlled, it’s simple.”
The North Dakota state constitution requires lawmakers to take an oath that reads: “‘I do solemnly swear (or affirm as the case may be) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of North Dakota; and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of _________ according to the best of my ability, so help me God’ (if an oath), (under pains and penalties of perjury) if an affirmation, and any other oath, declaration, or test may not be required as a qualification for any office or public trust.”
- News21 hours ago
‘Part of the Authoritarian Playbook’: Trump’s Courthouse Rant Slammed by Fascism Scholars
- News24 hours ago
McCarthy ‘Could Be a Former Speaker by the End of This Week’: Report
- RIGHT WING EXTREMISM18 hours ago
- News16 hours ago
Gaetz Needs Just Five Republicans to Oust McCarthy – He Already Has Three
- News21 mins ago
Trump Has Now ‘Crossed the Line Into Criminal Threats’: Top Legal Scholar